Université Clermont Auvergne, LAPSCO, CNRS, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 23;12(1):22241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25913-9.
The study investigated participants' verbal duration judgment and judgment of passage of time (PoT) when presented with an image for a few seconds (20 to 45 s) or minutes (80 to 180 s) with prospective and retrospective temporal judgment instruction, with their level of attention devoted to time tested. Their self-reported levels of emotion and attention were also assessed, as well as their individual impulsivity traits. Structural equation analyses showed that the best predictor of PoT judgment was emotion (boredom) regardless of duration range. For duration judgment, the best predictor for short durations was attention-related factors. However, for long durations, these factors ceased to be significant and were replaced by emotion, in the same way as for the PoT judgment. Indeed, these analyses suggested that duration judgment and PoT judgment were related for long durations of more than one minute, whereas they were not related for short durations of a few seconds.
该研究调查了参与者在呈现几秒钟（20 到 45 秒）或几分钟（80 到 180 秒）的图像时，根据前瞻性和回溯性时间判断指令，对言语持续时间判断和时间流逝判断（PoT）的情况，同时测试他们对时间的注意力水平。还评估了他们的自我报告情绪和注意力水平，以及他们的个体冲动特质。结构方程分析表明，无论持续时间范围如何，PoT 判断的最佳预测因子都是情绪（无聊）。对于持续时间判断，短时间的最佳预测因子是与注意力相关的因素。然而，对于长时间，这些因素不再显著，取而代之的是情绪，与 PoT 判断的方式相同。事实上，这些分析表明，对于一分钟以上的长时间，持续时间判断和 PoT 判断是相关的，而对于几秒钟的短时间，则没有相关性。
