Suppr超能文献

时间流逝判断并非时长判断:来自一项使用经验抽样方法研究的证据。

Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology.

作者信息

Droit-Volet Sylvie, Wearden John

机构信息

Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, UMR 6024, CNRS, Université of Clermont Auvergne Clermont-Ferrand, France.

University of Keele Keele, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments (DJs) in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method. The DJs were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passages of time judgments are not related to DJs.

摘要

本研究采用经验抽样法,考察了年轻人和老年人在日常生活中对时间流逝判断与时长判断(DJs)之间的关系。时长判断通过言语估计和区间生成测量来评估。结果显示,年轻人和老年人在时间流逝速度的判断上没有差异,这一结果与随着年龄增长时间过得更快的传统观念相反。时间流逝判断与时长判断之间也没有显著关系。此外,时间流逝判断中个体差异的显著预测因素(情绪状态和对当前活动的注意力焦点)并非时长判断的预测因素。总之,时间流逝判断与时长判断无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15f8/4759643/33ae5d840d0d/fpsyg-07-00176-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验