Droit-Volet Sylvie, Wearden John
Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, UMR 6024, CNRS, Université of Clermont Auvergne Clermont-Ferrand, France.
University of Keele Keele, UK.
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176. eCollection 2016.
This study examined relations between passage of time judgments and duration judgments (DJs) in everyday life, in young and elderly people, with an Experience Sampling Method. The DJs were assessed by verbal estimation and interval production measures. The results showed no difference between young and elderly people in judgments of rate of passage of time, a result contrary to the conventional idea that time passes more quickly as we get older. There were also no significant relation between the judgment of passage of time and the judgments of durations. In addition, the significant predictors of individual differences in the judgment of passage of time (emotion states and focus of attention on the current activity) were not predictors of judgment of durations. In sum, passages of time judgments are not related to DJs.
本研究采用经验抽样法,考察了年轻人和老年人在日常生活中对时间流逝判断与时长判断(DJs)之间的关系。时长判断通过言语估计和区间生成测量来评估。结果显示,年轻人和老年人在时间流逝速度的判断上没有差异,这一结果与随着年龄增长时间过得更快的传统观念相反。时间流逝判断与时长判断之间也没有显著关系。此外,时间流逝判断中个体差异的显著预测因素(情绪状态和对当前活动的注意力焦点)并非时长判断的预测因素。总之,时间流逝判断与时长判断无关。