Suppr超能文献

一项针对高危安全网患者减少医院再入院率的患者导航干预措施:一项随机对照试验。

A Patient Navigator Intervention to Reduce Hospital Readmissions among High-Risk Safety-Net Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Balaban Richard B, Galbraith Alison A, Burns Marguerite E, Vialle-Valentin Catherine E, Larochelle Marc R, Ross-Degnan Dennis

机构信息

Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Somerville Hospital Primary Care, 236 Highland Ave., Somerville, MA, 02143, USA,

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(7):907-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3185-x. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based interventions to reduce hospital readmissions may not generalize to resource-constrained safety-net hospitals.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if an intervention by patient navigators (PNs), hospital-based Community Health Workers, reduces readmissions among high risk, low socioeconomic status patients.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

General medicine inpatients having at least one of the following readmission risk factors: (1) age ≥60 years, (2) any in-network inpatient admission within the past 6 months, (3) length of stay ≥3 days, (4) admission diagnosis of heart failure, or (5) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The analytic sample included 585 intervention patients and 925 controls.

INTERVENTIONS

PNs provided coaching and assistance in navigating the transition from hospital to home through hospital visits and weekly telephone outreach, supporting patients for 30 days post-discharge with discharge preparation, medication management, scheduling of follow-up appointments, communication with primary care, and symptom management.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was in-network 30-day hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes included rates of outpatient follow-up. We evaluated outcomes for the entire cohort and stratified by patient age >60 years (425 intervention/584 controls) and ≤60 years (160 intervention/341 controls).

KEY RESULTS

Overall, 30-day readmission rates did not differ between intervention and control patients. However, the two age groups demonstrated marked differences. Intervention patients >60 years showed a statistically significant adjusted absolute 4.1% decrease [95% CI: -8.0%, -0.2%] in readmission with an increase in 30-day outpatient follow-up. Intervention patients ≤60 years showed a statistically significant adjusted absolute 11.8% increase [95% CI: 4.4%, 19.0%] in readmission with no change in 30-day outpatient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient navigator intervention among high risk, safety-net patients decreased readmission among older patients while increasing readmissions among younger patients. Care transition strategies should be evaluated among diverse populations, and younger high risk patients may require novel strategies.

摘要

背景

基于证据的减少医院再入院的干预措施可能无法推广到资源有限的安全网医院。

目的

确定由患者导航员(PNs),即医院社区卫生工作者进行的干预措施是否能降低高风险、低社会经济地位患者的再入院率。

设计

随机对照试验。

参与者

患有以下至少一种再入院风险因素的普通内科住院患者:(1)年龄≥60岁,(2)过去6个月内有任何网络内住院,(3)住院时间≥3天,(4)入院诊断为心力衰竭,或(5)慢性阻塞性肺疾病。分析样本包括585名干预患者和925名对照患者。

干预措施

患者导航员通过医院探访和每周电话随访,在指导和协助患者从医院过渡到家庭方面提供支持,在出院后30天内为患者提供出院准备、药物管理、安排随访预约、与初级保健沟通以及症状管理等方面的支持。

主要指标

主要结局是网络内30天医院再入院率。次要结局包括门诊随访率。我们评估了整个队列的结局,并按患者年龄>60岁(425名干预患者/584名对照患者)和≤60岁(160名干预患者/341名对照患者)进行分层。

关键结果

总体而言,干预组和对照组患者的30天再入院率没有差异。然而,两个年龄组显示出明显差异。60岁以上的干预患者再入院率经调整后绝对下降了4.1%[95%置信区间:-8.0%,-0.2%],且30天门诊随访有所增加。60岁及以下的干预患者再入院率经调整后绝对增加了11.8%[95%置信区间:4.4%,19.0%],30天门诊随访无变化。

结论

在高风险安全网患者中进行的患者导航员干预降低了老年患者的再入院率,同时增加了年轻患者的再入院率。护理过渡策略应在不同人群中进行评估,年轻的高风险患者可能需要新的策略。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Community health workers combat readmission.社区卫生工作者应对再入院问题。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Dec 10;172(22):1756-7. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.82.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验