Buckner Samuel L, Mouser J Grant, Jessee Matthew B, Dankel Scott J, Mattocks Kevin T, Loenneke Jeremy P
Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management. Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, The University of Mississippi, 231 Turner Center, University, Mississippi, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Apr;55(4):455-457. doi: 10.1002/mus.25461. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
The point at which an individual becomes resistance "trained" is not well defined in the literature. Some studies have defined training status as having engaged in consistent resistance training activities for a given period of time, whereas others base inclusion criteria on strength levels alone, or levels of strength in combination with training age/time. If the primary focus of a study is to examine adaptations in individuals with high levels of strength, then it may be appropriate to exclude the individuals who do not meet strength requirements. However, given the heterogeneity of the strength response to resistance training, strength cannot separate those who are "trained" from those who are "untrained." We suggest that, when determining resistance training status, training age (time) and the modality of training (specificity) should be the primary criteria considered. Muscle Nerve 55: 455-457, 2017.
个体在何时变得“经过抗阻训练”在文献中尚无明确界定。一些研究将训练状态定义为在特定时间段内持续进行抗阻训练活动，而另一些研究则仅依据力量水平，或结合训练年限/时间的力量水平来确定纳入标准。如果一项研究的主要重点是检查力量水平较高个体的适应性变化，那么排除不符合力量要求的个体可能是合适的。然而，鉴于抗阻训练后力量反应的异质性，力量无法区分“经过训练”和“未经过训练”的个体。我们建议，在确定抗阻训练状态时，训练年限（时间）和训练方式（特异性）应作为主要考虑标准。《肌肉与神经》55: 455 - 457, 2017年。
