Suppr超能文献

作物的基因组编辑:粮食安全的新机遇。

Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.

作者信息

Georges Fawzy, Ray Heather

机构信息

a Jene Quests Corporation , Saskatoon , SK , Canada.

出版信息

GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1270489. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

Abstract

Genome editing of crop plants is a rapidly advancing technology whereby targeted mutations can be introduced into a plant genome in a highly specific manner and with great precision. For the most part, the technology does not incorporate transgenic modifications and is far superior to conventional chemical mutagenesis. In this study we bring into focus some of the underlying differences between the 3 existing technologies: classical plant breeding, genetic modification and genome editing. We discuss some of the main achievements from each area and highlight their common characteristics and individual limitations, while emphasizing the unique capabilities of genome editing. We subsequently examine the possible regulatory mechanisms which governments may be inclined to use in assessing the status of genome edited products. If assessed on the basis of their phenotype rather than the process by which they are obtained, these products will be categorized as equivalent to those produced by classical mutagenesis. This would mean that genome edited products will not be subject to the restrictions imposed on genetically modified products, except in some cases where the mutation involves a large sequence insertion into the genome. We conclude by examining the potential of societal acceptance of genome editing technology, reinforced by a scientific perspective on promoting such acceptance.

摘要

作物的基因组编辑是一项快速发展的技术,通过该技术可以以高度特异性和极高的精准度将靶向突变引入植物基因组。在很大程度上,该技术不涉及转基因修饰,并且远优于传统的化学诱变方法。在本研究中,我们重点关注了现有三种技术之间的一些潜在差异:经典植物育种、基因修饰和基因组编辑。我们讨论了每个领域的一些主要成果,突出了它们的共同特征和各自的局限性,同时强调了基因组编辑的独特能力。随后,我们研究了政府在评估基因组编辑产品的地位时可能倾向采用的潜在监管机制。如果根据其表型而非获得它们的过程进行评估,这些产品将被归类为等同于通过经典诱变产生的产品。这意味着基因组编辑产品将不受施加于转基因产品的限制,除非在某些情况下突变涉及在基因组中插入大片段序列。我们通过审视社会对基因组编辑技术的接受潜力来得出结论,并从科学角度加强对促进这种接受的认识。

相似文献

1
Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.作物的基因组编辑:粮食安全的新机遇。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1270489. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
5
Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.加拿大对基因编辑作物的监管视角。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.消费者对通过基因组编辑培育的粮食作物的接受度。
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
8
Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.加拿大基因编辑技术的监管方面。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00153-2.
9
CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.CRISPR/Cas 系统:作物育种的机遇与挑战。
Plant Cell Rep. 2021 Jun;40(6):979-998. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02708-2. Epub 2021 May 11.

引用本文的文献

5
GMOs or non-GMOs? The CRISPR Conundrum.转基因生物还是非转基因生物?CRISPR 难题。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Oct 9;14:1232938. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1232938. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验