Suppr超能文献

一项关于基因编辑监管的社会经济影响的研究项目。

A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.

作者信息

Whelan Agustina I, Lema Martin A

机构信息

a Biotechnology Directorate , Ministry of AgroIndustry , Buenos Aires , Argentina.

b National University of Quilmes , Bernal , Argentina.

出版信息

GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):74-83. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1271856. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Abstract

Gene editing technologies are a group of recent innovations in plant breeding using molecular biology, which have in common the capability of introducing a site-directed mutation or deletion in the genome. The first cases of crops improved with these technologies are approaching the market; this has raised an international debate regarding if they should be regulated as genetically modified crops or just as another form of mutagenesis under conventional breeding. This dilemma for policymakers not only entails issues pertaining safety information and legal/regulatory definitions. It also demands borrowing tools developed in the field of social studies of science and technology, as an additional basis for sound decision making.

摘要

基因编辑技术是利用分子生物学在植物育种方面的一组最新创新技术,它们的共同特点是能够在基因组中引入定点突变或缺失。首批利用这些技术改良的作物正接近上市阶段;这引发了一场国际辩论,即它们应被作为转基因作物进行监管,还是仅作为传统育种下诱变的另一种形式。政策制定者面临的这一困境不仅涉及安全信息和法律/监管定义等问题。它还需要借鉴科学技术社会研究领域开发的工具,作为做出明智决策的额外依据。

相似文献

2
Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.作物的基因组编辑:粮食安全的新机遇。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1270489. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.加拿大对基因编辑作物的监管视角。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.加拿大基因编辑技术的监管方面。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00153-2.
9
Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.消费者对通过基因组编辑培育的粮食作物的接受度。
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2. Epub 2016 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

3
Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics.基因编辑监管与创新经济学
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 15;8:303. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00303. eCollection 2020.
5
Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.阿根廷基因编辑的监管方面。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2.
6
Profile of genetically modified plants authorized in Mexico.墨西哥授权的转基因植物概况。
GM Crops Food. 2018;9(3):152-168. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2018.1507601.

本文引用的文献

2
The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories of Agricultural Biotechnology.公众舆论在塑造农业生物技术轨迹中的作用。
Trends Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;34(7):530-534. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
3
Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.消费者对通过基因组编辑培育的粮食作物的接受度。
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
4
CRISPR/Cas9: an advanced tool for editing plant genomes.CRISPR/Cas9:一种用于编辑植物基因组的先进工具。
Transgenic Res. 2016 Oct;25(5):561-73. doi: 10.1007/s11248-016-9953-5. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
7
The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.基因组编辑作物的监管状况。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Feb;14(2):510-8. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12444. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
8
Cisgenic apple trees; development, characterization, and performance.顺基因苹果树;发育、特性及表现
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 27;6:286. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00286. eCollection 2015.
10
Comparative regulatory approaches for groups of new plant breeding techniques.新植物育种技术群组的比较监管方法。
N Biotechnol. 2013 Jun 25;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验