• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

越南患者在选择医疗服务提供者时所感知到的信息成本。

Information Expensiveness Perceived by Vietnamese Patients with Respect to Healthcare Provider's Choice.

作者信息

Quan-Hoang Vuong

机构信息

School of Business (FSB). FPT University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

Acta Inform Med. 2016 Oct;24(5):360-363. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.360-363. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

DOI:10.5455/aim.2016.24.360-363
PMID:28077894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5203750/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients have to acquire information to support their decision on choosing a suitable healthcare provider. But in developing countries like Vietnam, accessibility issues remain an obstacle, thus adversely affect both quality and costliness of healthcare information. Vietnamese use both sources from health professionals and friends/relatives, especially when quality of the Internet-based cheaper sources appear to be still questionable. The search of information from both professionals and friends/relatives incurs some cost, which can be viewed as low or high depending low or high accessibility to the sources. These views potentially affect their choices.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects that medical/health services information on perceived expensiveness of patients' labor costs. Two related objectives are a) establishing empirical relations between accessibility to sources and expensiveness; and, b) probabilistic trends of probabilities for perceived expensiveness.

RESULTS

There is evidence for established relations among the variables "Convexp" and "Convrel" (all p's < 0.01), indicating that both information sources (experts and friends/relatives) have influence on patients perception of information expensiveness. The use of experts source tends to increase the probability of perceived expensiveness.

CONCLUSION

a) Probabilistic trends show Vietnamese patients have propensity to value healthcare information highly and do not see it as "expensive"; b) The majority of Vietnamese households still take non-professional advices at their own risks; c) There is more for the public healthcare information system to do to reduce costliness and risk of information. The Internet-based health service users communities cannot replace this system.

摘要

背景

患者必须获取信息以支持他们选择合适医疗服务提供者的决定。但在越南这样的发展中国家,信息获取问题仍然是一个障碍,从而对医疗信息的质量和成本产生不利影响。越南人同时利用来自医疗专业人员和朋友/亲属的信息来源,尤其是当基于互联网的成本较低的信息来源质量似乎仍存在疑问时。从专业人员和朋友/亲属那里搜索信息会产生一些成本,根据信息来源的可获取性高低,这些成本可被视为低或高。这些观点可能会影响他们的选择。

目的

调查医疗/健康服务信息对患者感知劳动力成本昂贵程度的影响。两个相关目标是:a)确定信息来源的可获取性与昂贵程度之间的实证关系;b)感知昂贵程度的概率趋势。

结果

有证据表明变量“Convexp”和“Convrel”之间存在既定关系(所有p值<0.01),表明这两种信息来源(专家和朋友/亲属)都对患者对信息昂贵程度的感知有影响。使用专家来源往往会增加感知昂贵程度的概率。

结论

a)概率趋势表明越南患者倾向于高度重视医疗信息,并不认为其“昂贵”;b)大多数越南家庭仍自行承担接受非专业建议的风险;c)公共医疗信息系统还有更多工作要做,以降低信息的成本和风险。基于互联网的健康服务用户社区无法取代这个系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9cb/5203750/dba262338a0a/AIM-24-360-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9cb/5203750/740fd0d006c8/AIM-24-360-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9cb/5203750/dba262338a0a/AIM-24-360-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9cb/5203750/740fd0d006c8/AIM-24-360-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9cb/5203750/dba262338a0a/AIM-24-360-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Information Expensiveness Perceived by Vietnamese Patients with Respect to Healthcare Provider's Choice.越南患者在选择医疗服务提供者时所感知到的信息成本。
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Oct;24(5):360-363. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.360-363. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
2
The psychological mechanism of internet information processing for post-treatment evaluation.用于治疗后评估的网络信息处理的心理机制。
Heliyon. 2022 May;8(5):e09351. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09351. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
3
Data on Vietnamese patients׳ behavior in using information sources, perceived data sufficiency and (non)optimal choice of health care provider.关于越南患者使用信息来源的行为、感知到的数据充分性以及医疗服务提供者的(非)最佳选择的数据。
Data Brief. 2016 May 10;7:1687-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.04.066. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Inequality in healthcare costs between residing and non-residing patients: evidence from Vietnam.居住患者和非居住患者之间的医疗费用不平等:来自越南的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 May 12;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0581-3.
7
Perceived Challenges in Dementia Care by Vietnamese Family Caregivers and Care Workers in South Australia.越南家庭照顾者和南澳大利亚护理人员在痴呆症护理中所感知到的挑战
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2015 Sep;30(3):333-52. doi: 10.1007/s10823-015-9264-y.
8
Impact of Physician-Patient Communication in Online Health Communities on Patient Compliance: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.在线健康社区中医师-患者沟通对患者依从性的影响:横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 13;21(5):e12891. doi: 10.2196/12891.
9
Medical Expenses Matter Most for the Poor: Evidence from a Vietnamese Medical Survey.医疗费用对贫困人口最为重要:来自越南医疗调查的证据。
Mater Sociomed. 2016 Dec;28(6):429-431. doi: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.429-431.
10
Does public reporting influence quality, patient and provider's perspective, market share and disparities? A review.公众报告是否会影响质量、患者和提供者的看法、市场份额和差异?综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):972-978. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx145.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Associated With Diabetic Foot Prevention Among Rural Adults With Diabetes in North China.中国北方农村糖尿病患者糖尿病足预防的知识、态度和实践。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 20;10:876105. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.876105. eCollection 2022.
2
What Makes Vietnamese (Not) Attend Periodic General Health Examinations? A 2016 Cross-sectional Study.是什么导致越南人(不)参加定期全面体检?一项2016年的横断面研究。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017 Apr;8(2):147-154. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.2.07. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
3
Economic Benefits and Treatment Progress as Determinants of the Sustainability of Vietnamese Voluntary Co-Located Patients Clusters.

本文引用的文献

1
Data on Vietnamese patients׳ behavior in using information sources, perceived data sufficiency and (non)optimal choice of health care provider.关于越南患者使用信息来源的行为、感知到的数据充分性以及医疗服务提供者的(非)最佳选择的数据。
Data Brief. 2016 May 10;7:1687-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.04.066. eCollection 2016 Jun.
2
Investigation of the Impact of Extracting and Exchanging Health Information by Using Internet and Social Networks.利用互联网和社交网络提取与交换健康信息的影响调查
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Jun;24(3):197-201. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.197-201. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
3
Health information seeking, receipt, and use in diabetes self-management.
越南自愿合住患者群体可持续性的决定因素:经济效益与治疗进展
J Public Health Res. 2017 Apr 13;6(1):788. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.788.
4
Health communication, information technology and the public's attitude toward periodic general health examinations.健康传播、信息技术与公众对定期全面健康检查的态度。
F1000Res. 2016 Dec 30;5:2935. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10508.1. eCollection 2016.
糖尿病自我管理中的健康信息寻求、接收和使用。
Ann Fam Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;8(4):334-40. doi: 10.1370/afm.1115.
4
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.医疗保健消费者如何处理和评估比较性医疗保健信息?一项使用认知访谈的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 20;9:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-423.
5
Striking jump in consumers seeking health care information.寻求医疗保健信息的消费者数量大幅跃升。
Track Rep. 2008 Aug(20):1-8.
6
Access to health care in developing countries: breaking down demand side barriers.发展中国家的医疗保健服务可及性:消除需求侧障碍
Cad Saude Publica. 2007 Dec;23(12):2820-34. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007001200003.
7
Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.患者通过互联网获取健康信息:这如何影响医患关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
8
Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.健康信息的信任与来源:互联网的影响及其对医疗保健提供者的启示:首次健康信息国家趋势调查结果
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618-24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618.
9
Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性对互联网的使用情况。
J Med Internet Res. 2002 Apr-Nov;4(2):E9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e9.
10
DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.DISCERN:一种用于评判关于治疗选择的书面消费者健康信息质量的工具。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105.