• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟会在植物育种创新方面与科学界和世界其他地区脱节吗?

Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?

机构信息

Plant Breeding Innovation Advocacy, Euroseeds, Avenue des Arts 52, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Plant Cell Rep. 2020 Jan;39(1):163-167. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02482-2. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00299-019-02482-2
PMID:31754780
Abstract

Innovations in plant breeding like genome editing methods raised questions about the adequacy of established regulatory policies for plant breeding and biotechnology in view of these new breeding methods and the resulting products. Most countries follow the principle approach that only those plants will be regulated under biotech regulations that include a novel combination of genetic material following the Cartagena protocol. In contrast to this, the European Court of Justice interpreted the current EU biotech regulations in a way that these also apply to plants resulting from new mutagenesis breeding, even if these plants are indistinguishable from conventionally bred plants. This ruling created strong reactions and concerns stating that recent technical developments have made the EU GMO Directive no longer fit for purpose. The article describes ongoing policy developments on EU level that might result in an update of current regulations.

摘要

植物育种方面的创新,如基因组编辑方法,使得人们对现有的植物育种和生物技术监管政策是否充分产生了疑问,因为这些新的育种方法和由此产生的产品。大多数国家遵循的原则是,只有那些根据《卡塔赫纳议定书》包含新颖遗传物质组合的生物技术法规所涵盖的植物才需要受到监管。与此相反,欧洲法院对现行的欧盟生物技术法规的解释是,这些法规也适用于通过新的诱变育种产生的植物,即使这些植物与传统培育的植物无法区分。这一裁决引起了强烈的反应和担忧,称最近的技术发展使得欧盟的转基因生物指令不再适用。本文描述了欧盟层面正在进行的政策发展,这可能导致对现行法规的更新。

相似文献

1
Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?欧盟会在植物育种创新方面与科学界和世界其他地区脱节吗?
Plant Cell Rep. 2020 Jan;39(1):163-167. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02482-2. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
2
A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.一项关于基因编辑监管的社会经济影响的研究项目。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):74-83. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1271856. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
3
The EU Court of Justice extends the GMO Directive to gene-edited organisms.欧盟法院将转基因生物指令扩展至基因编辑生物。
FEBS Lett. 2018 Nov;592(22):3653-3657. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13293.
4
Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.基因组编辑的监管障碍:不同监管背景下基于过程与基于产品的方法
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1493-506. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.加拿大基因编辑技术的监管方面。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00153-2.
6
Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Scope and Definitions.改革欧盟关于转基因生物立法的选择:范围和定义。
Trends Biotechnol. 2020 Mar;38(3):231-234. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Legal and practical challenges to authorization of gene edited plants in the EU.欧盟基因编辑植物授权的法律和实践挑战。
N Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 25;60:183-188. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
8
The Romanian experience and perspective on the commercial cultivation of genetically modified crops in Europe.罗马尼亚在欧洲商业化种植转基因作物方面的经验和观点。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Feb;28(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11248-018-0095-9. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
9
European Court of Justice delivers no justice to Europe on genome-edited crops.欧洲法院在基因编辑作物问题上未给欧洲带来公正。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2020 Jan;18(1):8-10. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13200. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Fruit crops in the era of genome editing: closing the regulatory gap.基因组编辑时代的水果作物:填补监管空白。
Plant Cell Rep. 2021 Jun;40(6):915-930. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02664-x. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in genome editing in plants within an evolving regulatory landscape, with a focus on its application in wheat breeding.植物基因组编辑在不断演变的监管环境中的进展,重点关注其在小麦育种中的应用。
J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2025;34(3):599-614. doi: 10.1007/s13562-025-00981-w. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
3Bs of CRISPR-Cas mediated genome editing in plants: exploring the basics, bioinformatics and biosafety landscape.植物中CRISPR-Cas介导的基因组编辑的3B:探索基础、生物信息学及生物安全前景
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2023 Dec;29(12):1825-1850. doi: 10.1007/s12298-023-01397-3. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
SoyDBean: a database for SNPs reconciliation by multiple versions of soybean reference genomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.阿根廷基因编辑的监管方面。
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2.
2
The global need for plant breeding innovation.
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):81-86. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00138-1.
3
Russia joins in global gene-editing bonanza.俄罗斯加入全球基因编辑热潮。
Nature. 2019 May;569(7756):319-320. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01519-6.
SoyDBean:一个通过多个大豆参考基因组版本进行 SNP 协调的数据库。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 21;13(1):15712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42898-1.
4
Genome editing and beyond: what does it mean for the future of plant breeding?基因组编辑及其他:对植物育种的未来意味着什么?
Planta. 2022 May 19;255(6):130. doi: 10.1007/s00425-022-03906-2.
5
Biotechnological Importance of  : From the Obscurity to the Spotlight.[具体事物]的生物技术重要性:从默默无闻走向聚光灯下。 需注意,原文中“of ”后面缺少具体内容,以上译文是补充完整后的示意翻译。
J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;7(9):712. doi: 10.3390/jof7090712.
6
Vision, challenges and opportunities for a Plant Cell Atlas.植物细胞图谱的愿景、挑战与机遇
Elife. 2021 Sep 7;10:e66877. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66877.
7
Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review.基因编辑作物蓬勃发展背景下转基因作物的全球监管——综述
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 24;12:630396. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.630396. eCollection 2021.
8
Potential, Challenges, and Threats for the Application of New Breeding Techniques by the Private Plant Breeding Sector in the EU.欧盟私营植物育种部门应用新育种技术的潜力、挑战与威胁
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 25;11:582011. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.582011. eCollection 2020.
9
Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics.基因编辑监管与创新经济学
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 15;8:303. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00303. eCollection 2020.
4
A novel governance framework for GMO: A tiered, more flexible regulation for GMOs would help to stimulate innovation and public debate.一种新的转基因生物治理框架:对转基因生物实施分层、更灵活的监管,将有助于激发创新和公共讨论。
EMBO Rep. 2019 May;20(5). doi: 10.15252/embr.201947812. Epub 2019 Apr 23.