Flury Simon, Peutzfeldt Anne, Schmidlin Patrick R, Lussi Adrian
Department of Preventive, Restorative, and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Division of Periodontology and Peri-Implant Diseases, Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0169680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169680. eCollection 2017.
To compare various pre-treatments serving as cleaning procedures of dentin on the bond strength of resin composite promoted by a universal adhesive system applied either in the absence or presence of simulated pulpal pressure.
Prior to application of the adhesive system (Scotchbond Universal) and resin composite (Filtek Z250), ground dentin surfaces were given one of five pre-treatments either without or with simulated pulpal pressure: 1) no pre-treatment, adhesive system in "self-etch" mode, 2) phosphoric acid etching, adhesive system in "total-etch" mode, 3) polishing with pumice on prophylaxis cup, 4) air abrasion with AIR-FLOW PLUS powder, 5) air abrasion with AIR-FLOW PERIO powder; n = 20/group of pre-treatment. After storage (37°C, 100% humidity, 24 h), micro shear bond strength was measured and data analyzed with parametric ANOVA including Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing followed by Student's t tests (significance level: α = 0.05).
The ANOVA found type of pre-treatment and simulated pulpal pressure to have no significant effect on dentin bond strength. The explorative post-hoc tests showed a negative effect of simulated pulpal pressure for phosphoric acid etching (adhesive system in "total-etch" mode; p = 0.020), but not for the other four pre-treatments (all p = 1.000).
Air abrasion with powders containing either erythritol and chlorhexidine (AIR-FLOW PLUS) or glycine (AIR-FLOW PERIO) yielded dentin bond strengths similar to no pre-treatment, phosphoric acid etching, or polishing with pumice. Simulated pulpal pressure reduced the bond strength only when the self-etch adhesive system was used in total-etch mode.
比较各种作为牙本质清洁程序的预处理方法,对在有无模拟牙髓压力情况下应用通用粘结系统促进树脂复合材料粘结强度的影响。
在应用粘结系统(3M Scotchbond Universal)和树脂复合材料(3M Filtek Z250)之前,对磨除的牙本质表面进行五种预处理方法中的一种,分为无模拟牙髓压力组和有模拟牙髓压力组:1)不进行预处理,粘结系统采用“自酸蚀”模式;2)磷酸酸蚀,粘结系统采用“全酸蚀”模式;3)用浮石在预防杯上抛光;4)用AIR-FLOW PLUS粉末进行空气喷砂;5)用AIR-FLOW PERIO粉末进行空气喷砂;每组预处理方法设置20个样本。储存后(37℃,100%湿度,24小时),测量微剪切粘结强度,并采用参数方差分析对数据进行分析,包括用于多重检验的Bonferroni-Holm校正,随后进行Student's t检验(显著性水平:α = 0.05)。
方差分析发现预处理类型和模拟牙髓压力对牙本质粘结强度无显著影响。探索性事后检验显示,模拟牙髓压力对磷酸酸蚀(粘结系统采用“全酸蚀”模式)有负面影响(p = 0.020),但对其他四种预处理方法无影响(所有p = 1.000)。
用含有赤藓糖醇和氯己定的粉末(AIR-FLOW PLUS)或甘氨酸的粉末(AIR-FLOW PERIO)进行空气喷砂产生的牙本质粘结强度,与不进行预处理、磷酸酸蚀或用浮石抛光相似。仅当自酸蚀粘结系统采用全酸蚀模式时,模拟牙髓压力才会降低粘结强度。