Ismail Sharif, Nason Edward, Marjanovic Sonja, Grant Jonathan
Rand Health Q. 2012 Dec 1;1(4):11. eCollection 2012 Winter.
Bibliometric analysis is an increasingly important part of a broader "toolbox" of evaluation methods available to research and development (R&D) policymakers to support decision-making. In the US, UK and Australia, for example, there is evidence of gradual convergence over the past ten years towards a model of university research assessment and ranking incorporating the use of bibliometric measures. In Britain, the Department of Health (England) has shown growing interest in using bibliometric analysis to support prospective R&D decision-making, and has engaged RAND Europe's expertise in this area through a number of exercises since 2005. These range from the macro-level selection of potentially high impact institutions, to micro-level selection of high impact individuals for the National Institute for Health Research's faculty of researchers. The aim of this study is to create an accessible, "beginner's guide" to bibliometric theory and application in the area of health R&D decision-making. The study also aims to identify future directions and possible next steps in this area, based on RAND Europe's work with the Department of Health to date. It is targeted at a range of audiences, and will be of interest to health and biomedical researchers, as well as R&D decision-makers in the UK and elsewhere. The study was completed with funding support from RAND Europe's Health R&D Policy Research Unit with the Department of Health.
文献计量分析在研发(R&D)政策制定者可用于支持决策的更广泛“工具箱”评估方法中,正日益成为重要组成部分。例如,在美国、英国和澳大利亚,有证据表明在过去十年里逐渐趋向于采用一种纳入文献计量指标的大学研究评估和排名模式。在英国,(英格兰)卫生部对利用文献计量分析支持前瞻性研发决策表现出越来越浓厚的兴趣,自2005年以来通过一系列活动利用了兰德欧洲公司在这一领域的专业知识。这些活动范围从宏观层面选择潜在的高影响力机构,到微观层面为国家卫生研究院的研究人员队伍挑选高影响力个人。本研究的目的是创建一份通俗易懂的“初学者指南”,介绍卫生研发决策领域的文献计量理论与应用。该研究还旨在根据兰德欧洲公司迄今与卫生部的合作,确定该领域未来的方向和可能的后续步骤。它面向一系列受众,英国及其他地方的卫生和生物医学研究人员以及研发决策者都会感兴趣。该研究在兰德欧洲公司卫生研发政策研究部和卫生部的资金支持下完成。