• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文献计量学作为支持健康科学领域前瞻性研发决策的工具:优势、劣势及未来发展选择

Bibliometrics as a Tool for Supporting Prospective R&D Decision-Making in the Health Sciences: Strengths, Weaknesses and Options for Future Development.

作者信息

Ismail Sharif, Nason Edward, Marjanovic Sonja, Grant Jonathan

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2012 Dec 1;1(4):11. eCollection 2012 Winter.

PMID:28083218
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4945260/
Abstract

Bibliometric analysis is an increasingly important part of a broader "toolbox" of evaluation methods available to research and development (R&D) policymakers to support decision-making. In the US, UK and Australia, for example, there is evidence of gradual convergence over the past ten years towards a model of university research assessment and ranking incorporating the use of bibliometric measures. In Britain, the Department of Health (England) has shown growing interest in using bibliometric analysis to support prospective R&D decision-making, and has engaged RAND Europe's expertise in this area through a number of exercises since 2005. These range from the macro-level selection of potentially high impact institutions, to micro-level selection of high impact individuals for the National Institute for Health Research's faculty of researchers. The aim of this study is to create an accessible, "beginner's guide" to bibliometric theory and application in the area of health R&D decision-making. The study also aims to identify future directions and possible next steps in this area, based on RAND Europe's work with the Department of Health to date. It is targeted at a range of audiences, and will be of interest to health and biomedical researchers, as well as R&D decision-makers in the UK and elsewhere. The study was completed with funding support from RAND Europe's Health R&D Policy Research Unit with the Department of Health.

摘要

文献计量分析在研发(R&D)政策制定者可用于支持决策的更广泛“工具箱”评估方法中,正日益成为重要组成部分。例如,在美国、英国和澳大利亚,有证据表明在过去十年里逐渐趋向于采用一种纳入文献计量指标的大学研究评估和排名模式。在英国,(英格兰)卫生部对利用文献计量分析支持前瞻性研发决策表现出越来越浓厚的兴趣,自2005年以来通过一系列活动利用了兰德欧洲公司在这一领域的专业知识。这些活动范围从宏观层面选择潜在的高影响力机构,到微观层面为国家卫生研究院的研究人员队伍挑选高影响力个人。本研究的目的是创建一份通俗易懂的“初学者指南”,介绍卫生研发决策领域的文献计量理论与应用。该研究还旨在根据兰德欧洲公司迄今与卫生部的合作,确定该领域未来的方向和可能的后续步骤。它面向一系列受众,英国及其他地方的卫生和生物医学研究人员以及研发决策者都会感兴趣。该研究在兰德欧洲公司卫生研发政策研究部和卫生部的资金支持下完成。

相似文献

1
Bibliometrics as a Tool for Supporting Prospective R&D Decision-Making in the Health Sciences: Strengths, Weaknesses and Options for Future Development.文献计量学作为支持健康科学领域前瞻性研发决策的工具:优势、劣势及未来发展选择
Rand Health Q. 2012 Dec 1;1(4):11. eCollection 2012 Winter.
2
How do NIHR peer review panels use bibliometric information to support their decisions?英国国家卫生研究院同行评审小组如何利用文献计量信息来支持其决策?
Scientometrics. 2017;112(3):1813-1835. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2417-8. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
3
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
4
A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences.文献计量学的描述性与历史性综述及其在医学科学中的应用
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Jun;35(6):551-9. doi: 10.1002/phar.1586. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Mapping the dengue scientific landscape worldwide: a bibliometric and network analysis.绘制全球登革热科学版图:文献计量与网络分析
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017 May;112(5):354-363. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760160423. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
[Bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews in the Neonatal Cochrane Collaboration. Its role in evidence-based decision making in neonatology].[新生儿科Cochrane协作网系统评价的文献计量学分析。其在新生儿学循证决策中的作用]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2004 May;60(5):417-27. doi: 10.1016/s1695-4033(04)78300-9.
9
Four Decades of Research in Alzheimer's Disease (1975-2014): A Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis.阿尔茨海默病四十年研究(1975 - 2014):文献计量与科学计量分析
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(2):763-783. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170184.
10
Informing vaccine decision-making: A strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines-SMART Vaccines 2.0.为疫苗决策提供信息:一种用于疫苗的战略性多属性排序工具——智能疫苗2.0
Vaccine. 2017 Jan 20;35 Suppl 1:A43-A45. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.086. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric analysis of scholarly publications related to family medicine in Thailand.泰国与家庭医学相关学术出版物的文献计量分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 2;10(21):e40090. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40090. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Global research profile on monkeypox-related literature (1962-2022): A bibliometric analysis.猴痘相关文献的全球研究概况(1962 - 2022):一项文献计量分析
Narra J. 2022 Dec;2(3):e96. doi: 10.52225/narra.v2i3.96. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Research and Public Interest in Mindfulness in the COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Era: A Bibliometric and Google Trends Analysis.在 COVID-19 及后 COVID-19 时代对正念的研究和公众兴趣:文献计量学和谷歌趋势分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3807. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053807.
4
Inequalities in COVID-19 inequalities research: Who had the capacity to respond?新冠疫情不平等研究中的不平等:谁有能力做出回应?
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0266132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266132. eCollection 2022.
5
Ovarian cancer in Morocco: Time to act is now.摩洛哥的卵巢癌:现在是行动的时候了。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 Sep 3;37:100857. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100857. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Tracing ovarian cancer research in Morocco: A bibliometric analysis.摩洛哥卵巢癌研究追踪:文献计量分析
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 May 7;37:100777. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100777. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
When silence goes viral, Africa sneezes! A perspective on Africa's subdued research response to COVID-19 and a call for local scientific evidence.当沉默在网络上蔓延,非洲就会打喷嚏!对非洲在 COVID-19 研究方面反应迟钝的看法,以及对当地科学证据的呼吁。
Environ Res. 2021 Mar;194:110637. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110637. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
8
Temporal trend of research related to gun violence from 1981 to 2018 in the United States: a bibliometric analysis.1981年至2018年美国枪支暴力相关研究的时间趋势:一项文献计量分析。
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 23;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-0235-6.
9
Older Adults and Digital Society: Scientific Coverage.老年人与数字社会:科学综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 5;16(11):2010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112010.
10
Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015).全球健康不平等研究中的不平等:一项50年的文献计量分析(1966 - 2015年)
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0191901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191901. eCollection 2018.