Suppr超能文献

在美国中年成年人全国性研究(MIDUS)中关于休闲时间、职业、家务体力活动与胰岛素抵抗(稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数)的研究

Leisure-time, occupational, household physical activity and insulin resistance (HOMAIR) in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) national study of adults.

作者信息

Tsenkova Vera K

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute on Aging, 1300 University Avenue, 2245 MSC, Madison, WI 53706, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2017 Jan 3;5:224-227. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.025. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Physical activity is a critical cornerstone of successful diabetes prevention and management. Current U.S. physical activity guidelines do not differentiate among physical activity for leisure, work, or other purposes, effectively implying that physical activity in any domain confers the same health benefits. It is currently unknown whether physical activity performed in different domains (leisure-time physical activity = LTPA, occupational physical activity = OPA, and household physical activity = HPA) is associated with insulin resistance. The associations between LTPA, OPA, HPA, and insulin resistance (indexed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance = HOMAIR) were determined in the MIDUS (Midlife in the U.S.; 1995-2006) national study ( = 1229, ages 34-84). Not meeting physical activity guidelines with LTPA was associated with a 34% higher HOMAIR among participants with diabetes, 42% higher HOMAIR among participants with prediabetes, and 17% higher HOMAIR among participants with normal glucoregulation. These associations were slightly attenuated but remained significant after further adjusting for obesity status, education, smoking, and alcohol intake. There was no evidence that engaging in OPA or HPA was significantly associated with HOMAIR. These results confirm the health-promoting role of LTPA and suggest that LTPA may provide unique glucoregulatory benefits, as opposed to HPA and OPA. Physical activity domain is an important dimension that potentially belongs in the guidelines, similarly to intensity, frequency, duration, and type.

摘要

身体活动是成功预防和管理糖尿病的关键基石。美国现行的身体活动指南并未区分休闲、工作或其他目的的身体活动,实际上意味着任何领域的身体活动都能带来相同的健康益处。目前尚不清楚在不同领域进行的身体活动(休闲时间身体活动=LTPA、职业身体活动=OPA和家务身体活动=HPA)是否与胰岛素抵抗相关。在美国中年研究(MIDUS;1995 - 2006年)中确定了LTPA、OPA、HPA与胰岛素抵抗(通过胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估=HOMAIR来衡量)之间的关联(n = 1229,年龄34 - 84岁)。在糖尿病患者中,未达到LTPA身体活动指南与HOMAIR升高34%相关,在糖尿病前期患者中升高42%,在血糖调节正常的参与者中升高17%。在进一步调整肥胖状况、教育程度、吸烟和饮酒量后,这些关联略有减弱但仍具有显著性。没有证据表明从事OPA或HPA与HOMAIR有显著关联。这些结果证实了LTPA的健康促进作用,并表明与HPA和OPA不同,LTPA可能提供独特的血糖调节益处。身体活动领域是一个重要维度,可能与强度、频率、持续时间和类型一样属于指南范畴。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes.2. 糖尿病的分类与诊断。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S13-22. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验