Goldsen Jayn, Bryan Amanda E B, Kim Hyun-Jun, Muraco Anna, Jen Sarah, Fredriksen-Goldsen Karen I
School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle.
Department of Sociology, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA.
Gerontologist. 2017 Feb;57(suppl 1):S50-S62. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw174.
Until recently, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) adults were excluded from full participation in civil marriage. The purpose of this study is to examine how legal marriage and relationship status are associated with health-promoting and at-risk factors, health, and quality of life of LGBT adults aged 50 and older.
We utilized weighted survey data from Aging with Pride: National Health, Aging, and Sexuality/Gender Study (NHAS) participants who resided in states with legalized same-sex marriage in 2014 (N = 1,821). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to examine differences by relationship status (legally married, unmarried partnered, single) in economic and social resources; LGBT contextual and identity factors; health; and quality of life.
We found 24% were legally married, and 26% unmarried partnered; one-half were single. Those legally married reported better quality of life and more economic and social resources than unmarried partnered; physical health indicators were similar between legally married and unmarried partnered. Those single reported poorer health and fewer resources than legally married and unmarried partnered. Among women, being legally married was associated with more LGBT microaggressions.
LGBT older adults, and practitioners serving them, should become educated about how legal same-sex marriage interfaces with the context of LGBT older adults' lives, and policies and protections related to age and sexual and gender identity. Longitudinal research is needed to understand factors contributing to decisions to marry, including short- and long-term economic, social, and health outcomes associated with legal marriage among LGBT older adults.
直到最近,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)成年人仍被排除在完全参与民事婚姻之外。本研究的目的是探讨合法婚姻和恋爱状况如何与50岁及以上LGBT成年人的健康促进因素、风险因素、健康状况和生活质量相关联。
我们利用了来自“骄傲地变老:全国健康、衰老与性取向/性别研究”(NHAS)参与者的加权调查数据,这些参与者居住在2014年同性婚姻合法化的州(N = 1,821)。进行多项逻辑回归分析,以检验恋爱状况(合法结婚、未婚伴侣关系、单身)在经济和社会资源、LGBT背景和身份因素、健康状况以及生活质量方面的差异。
我们发现24%的人合法结婚,26%的人处于未婚伴侣关系;一半的人单身。与未婚伴侣相比,合法结婚的人报告的生活质量更高,拥有更多的经济和社会资源;合法结婚者和未婚伴侣的身体健康指标相似。单身者报告的健康状况比合法结婚者和未婚伴侣差,资源也更少。在女性中,合法结婚与更多的LGBT微侵犯行为相关。
LGBT老年成年人以及为他们服务的从业者应该了解合法的同性婚姻如何与LGBT老年成年人的生活背景以及与年龄、性取向和性别认同相关的政策和保护措施相互作用。需要进行纵向研究,以了解促成结婚决定的因素,包括LGBT老年成年人合法婚姻相关的短期和长期经济、社会及健康结果。