Vélez Clorinda E, Krause Elizabeth D, Brunwasser Steven M, Freres Derek R, Abenavoli Rachel M, Gillham Jane E
Department of Psychology, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT; Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA.
Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Early Adolesc. 2014;35(7):931-946. doi: 10.1177/0272431614547050. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
The current study tested the prospective relations (six month lag) between three aspects of the parent-child relationship at Time 1 (T1) and adolescents' explanatory styles at Time 2 (T2): caregiving behaviors, parents' explanatory style for their own negative events, and parents' explanatory style for their children's negative events. The sample included 129 adolescents aged 11 to 14 years at baseline and their parents. Adolescents reported on their own explanatory style and their parents' caregiving behaviors; parents self-reported on their caregiving behaviors and their explanatory style for their own and their children's events. Regression analyses identified maternal acceptance as a significant predictor of T2 adolescents' explanatory style. Marginal effects emerged for fathers' psychological control and fathers' explanatory style for their children's events. Findings suggest that the ways parents - especially mothers - interact with their children may play a role in adolescents' cognitive vulnerability to depression.
本研究检验了时间1(T1)时亲子关系的三个方面与时间2(T2)时青少年的解释风格之间的前瞻性关系(六个月的时间间隔):养育行为、父母对自身负面事件的解释风格以及父母对子女负面事件的解释风格。样本包括129名基线年龄为11至14岁的青少年及其父母。青少年报告了自己的解释风格和父母的养育行为;父母则自我报告了自己的养育行为以及对自身和子女事件的解释风格。回归分析确定母亲的接纳是T2时青少年解释风格的一个重要预测因素。父亲的心理控制以及父亲对子女事件的解释风格产生了边际效应。研究结果表明,父母尤其是母亲与孩子互动的方式可能在青少年对抑郁症的认知易感性中起作用。