Garg Amit X, Suri Rita S, Eggers Paul, Finkelstein Fredric O, Greene Tom, Kimmel Paul L, Kliger Alan S, Larive Brett, Lindsay Robert M, Pierratos Andreas, Unruh Mark, Chertow Glenn M
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Kidney Int. 2017 Mar;91(3):746-754. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.033. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
Most patients with end-stage kidney disease value their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and want to know how it will be affected by their dialysis modality. We extended the findings of two prior clinical trial reports to estimate the effects of frequent compared to conventional hemodialysis on additional measures of HRQoL. The Daily Trial randomly assigned 245 patients to receive frequent (six times per week) or conventional (three times per week) in-center hemodialysis. The Nocturnal Trial randomly assigned 87 patients to receive frequent nocturnal (six times per week) or conventional (three times per week) home hemodialysis. All patients were on conventional hemodialysis prior to randomization, with an average feeling thermometer score of 70 to 75 (a visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where 100 is perfect health), an average general health scale score of 40 to 47 (a score from 0 to 100 where 100 is perfect health), and an average dialysis session recovery time of 2 to 3 hours. Outcomes are reported as the between-treatment group differences in one-year change in HRQoL measures and analyzed using linear mixed effects models. After one year in the Daily Trial, patients assigned to frequent in-center hemodialysis reported a higher feeling thermometer score, better general health, and a shorter recovery time after a dialysis session compared to standard thrice-weekly dialysis. After one year in the Nocturnal Trial, patients assigned to frequent home hemodialysis also reported a shorter recovery time after a dialysis session, but no statistical difference in their feeling thermometer or general health scores compared to standard home dialysis schedules. Thus, patients receiving day or nocturnal hemodialysis on average recovered approximately one hour earlier from a frequent compared to conventional hemodialysis session. Patients treated in an in-center dialysis facility reported better HRQoL with frequent compared to conventional hemodialysis.
大多数终末期肾病患者重视其健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),并想了解透析方式将如何影响这一指标。我们扩展了两项先前临床试验报告的结果,以评估与传统血液透析相比,频繁血液透析对HRQoL其他指标的影响。日间试验将245名患者随机分配,分别接受频繁(每周六次)或传统(每周三次)的中心血液透析。夜间试验将87名患者随机分配,分别接受频繁夜间(每周六次)或传统(每周三次)的家庭血液透析。所有患者在随机分组前均接受传统血液透析,平均感觉温度计评分为70至75(0至100的视觉模拟量表,100表示完全健康),平均总体健康量表评分为40至47(0至100的评分,100表示完全健康),平均透析 session 恢复时间为2至3小时。结果报告为治疗组之间HRQoL指标一年变化的差异,并使用线性混合效应模型进行分析。在日间试验进行一年后,与标准的每周三次透析相比,分配到频繁中心血液透析的患者报告感觉温度计评分更高、总体健康状况更好,且透析 session 后的恢复时间更短。在夜间试验进行一年后,分配到频繁家庭血液透析的患者也报告透析 session 后的恢复时间更短,但与标准家庭透析方案相比,他们的感觉温度计或总体健康评分无统计学差异。因此,与传统血液透析相比,接受日间或夜间血液透析的患者在频繁透析 session 后平均提前约一小时恢复。在中心透析设施接受治疗的患者报告,与传统血液透析相比,频繁血液透析的HRQoL更好。