Aydin-Schmidt Berit, Morris Ulrika, Ding Xavier C, Jovel Irina, Msellem Mwinyi I, Bergman Daniel, Islam Atiqul, Ali Abdullah S, Polley Spencer, Gonzalez Iveth J, Mårtensson Andreas, Björkman Anders
Centre for Malaria Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Unit of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169037. eCollection 2017.
New field applicable diagnostic tools are needed for highly sensitive detection of residual malaria infections in pre-elimination settings. Field performance of a high throughput DNA extraction system for loop mediated isothermal amplification (HTP-LAMP) was therefore evaluated for detecting malaria parasites among asymptomatic individuals in Zanzibar.
HTP-LAMP performance was evaluated against real-time PCR on 3008 paired blood samples collected on filter papers in a community-based survey in 2015.
The PCR and HTP-LAMP determined malaria prevalences were 1.6% (95%CI 1.3-2.4) and 0.7% (95%CI 0.4-1.1), respectively. The sensitivity of HTP-LAMP compared to PCR was 40.8% (CI95% 27.0-55.8) and the specificity was 99.9% (CI95% 99.8-100). For the PCR positive samples, there was no statistically significant difference between the geometric mean parasite densities among the HTP-LAMP positive (2.5 p/μL, range 0.2-770) and HTP-LAMP negative (1.4 p/μL, range 0.1-7) samples (p = 0.088). Two lab technicians analysed up to 282 samples per day and the HTP-LAMP method was experienced as user friendly.
Although field applicable, this high throughput format of LAMP as used here was not sensitive enough to be recommended for detection of asymptomatic low-density infections in areas like Zanzibar, approaching malaria elimination.
在疟疾消除前阶段,需要新的适用于现场的诊断工具来高灵敏度地检测残留的疟疾感染。因此,对用于环介导等温扩增的高通量DNA提取系统(HTP-LAMP)在桑给巴尔无症状个体中检测疟原虫的现场性能进行了评估。
在2015年一项基于社区的调查中,对收集在滤纸上的3008对血样,将HTP-LAMP的性能与实时PCR进行了比较评估。
PCR和HTP-LAMP测定的疟疾患病率分别为1.6%(95%CI 1.3 - 2.4)和0.7%(95%CI 0.4 - 1.1)。与PCR相比,HTP-LAMP的灵敏度为40.8%(CI95% 27.0 - 55.8),特异性为99.9%(CI95% 99.8 - 100)。对于PCR阳性样本,HTP-LAMP阳性样本(2.5个/微升,范围0.2 - 770)和HTP-LAMP阴性样本(1.4个/微升,范围0.1 - 7)之间的几何平均寄生虫密度没有统计学显著差异(p = 0.088)。两名实验室技术人员每天最多分析282个样本,HTP-LAMP方法被认为对用户友好。
尽管适用于现场,但这里使用的这种高通量LAMP格式灵敏度不够高,不足以推荐用于在像桑给巴尔这样接近疟疾消除的地区检测无症状低密度感染。