Suppr超能文献

含牛乳来源低聚糖婴儿配方奶粉的生长及安全性评估:一项随机、双盲、非劣效性试验

Growth and safety evaluation of infant formulae containing oligosaccharides derived from bovine milk: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial.

作者信息

Meli Ferdinando, Puccio Giuseppe, Cajozzo Cinzia, Ricottone Giovanni Licata, Pecquet Sophie, Sprenger Norbert, Steenhout Philippe

机构信息

Dipartimento Materno Infantile, Unità Operativa di Neonatologia, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Nestlé Nutrition, Nestec Ltd, 22 av Reller, 1800, Vevey, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2014 Dec 20;14:306. doi: 10.1186/s12887-014-0306-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A limited number of nondigestible oligosaccharides are available for use in infant formula. This study evaluated growth and safety in infants fed formula supplemented with a mixture of bovine milk-derived oligosaccharides (BMOS). This mixture, which was generated from whey permeate, contains galactooligosaccharides and other oligosaccharides from bovine milk, such as 3'- and 6'-sialyllactose. We hypothesized that growth in infants fed BMOS-supplemented formula would be noninferior to that in infants fed standard formula.

METHODS

Healthy term infants ≤14 days old were randomly assigned to standard formula (control; n = 84); standard formula with BMOS (IF-BMOS; n = 99); or standard formula with BMOS and probiotics (Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus) (IF-BMOS + Pro; n = 98). A breastfed reference group was also enrolled (n = 30). The primary outcome was mean weight gain/day from enrollment to age 4 months (noninferiority margin: -3.0 g/day).

RESULTS

189 (67.3%) formula-fed infants were included in the primary analysis. Mean differences in weight gain between the control and IF-BMOS and IF-BMOS + Pro groups were <1 g/day, with 97.5% confidence intervals above -3.0 g/day, indicating noninferior weight gain in the BMOS formula groups. Compared with control, infants in the BMOS groups had more frequent (p < 0.0001) and less hard (p = 0.0003) stools. No significant differences were observed between the control and BMOS groups in caregivers' reports of flatulence, vomiting, spitting up, crying, fussing, and colic. When based on clinical evaluation by the investigator, the incidence of colic was higher (p = 0.01) in IF-BMOS than in control; the incidence of investigator-diagnosed colic was not significantly different in control and IF-BMOS + Pro (p = 0.15). Stool bifidobacteria and lactobacilli counts were higher with IF-BMOS + Pro compared with control (p < 0.05), whereas Clostridia counts were lower (p < 0.05) in both BMOS groups compared with control.

CONCLUSIONS

Infant formula containing BMOS either with or without probiotics provides adequate nutrition for normal growth in healthy term infants. Further studies are needed to fully explore the digestive tolerance of BMOS formula.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01886898 . Registered 24 June 2013.

摘要

背景

可用于婴儿配方奶粉的不可消化寡糖数量有限。本研究评估了喂食添加了牛乳来源寡糖混合物(BMOS)的配方奶粉的婴儿的生长情况和安全性。该混合物由乳清渗透物生成,含有低聚半乳糖和其他来自牛乳的寡糖,如3'-唾液酸乳糖和6'-唾液酸乳糖。我们假设,喂食添加BMOS配方奶粉的婴儿的生长情况不劣于喂食标准配方奶粉的婴儿。

方法

将≤14日龄的健康足月儿随机分配至标准配方奶粉组(对照组;n = 84);添加BMOS的标准配方奶粉组(IF-BMOS组;n = 99);或添加BMOS和益生菌(长双歧杆菌、鼠李糖乳杆菌)的标准配方奶粉组(IF-BMOS + Pro组;n = 98)。还纳入了一个母乳喂养参考组(n = 30)。主要结局是从入组至4月龄时的平均每日体重增加量(非劣效界值:-3.0 g/天)。

结果

189名(67.3%)喂食配方奶粉的婴儿纳入了主要分析。对照组与IF-BMOS组和IF-BMOS + Pro组之间的体重增加平均差异<1 g/天,97.5%置信区间高于-3.0 g/天,表明BMOS配方奶粉组的体重增加非劣效。与对照组相比,BMOS组婴儿的大便更频繁(p < 0.0001)且更软(p = 0.0003)。在照顾者报告的肠胃胀气、呕吐、吐奶、哭闹、烦躁和腹绞痛方面,对照组与BMOS组之间未观察到显著差异。根据研究者的临床评估,IF-BMOS组的腹绞痛发生率高于对照组(p = 0.01);对照组与IF-BMOS + Pro组中研究者诊断的腹绞痛发生率无显著差异(p = 0.15)。与对照组相比,IF-BMOS + Pro组的粪便双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌计数更高(p < 0.05),而两个BMOS组的梭状芽孢杆菌计数均低于对照组(p < 0.05)。

结论

含或不含益生菌的BMOS婴儿配方奶粉可为健康足月儿的正常生长提供充足营养。需要进一步研究以充分探索BMOS配方奶粉的消化耐受性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01886898。2013年6月24日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c8/4297447/df7c11a24f1a/12887_2014_306_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验