KU Leuven, School Psychology and Development in Context, Tiensestraat 102 - box 37, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Utrecht University, Youth and Family, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Feb;47(2):260-274. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0634-3. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Adolescents' conflict management styles with parents are assumed to have an important impact on the quality of the parent-adolescent relationship and on adolescents' psychosocial development. Longitudinal research investigating possible determinants of these conflict management skills is scarce. The parenting context and adolescents' tendency to reject maternal authority are expected to shape adolescents' conflict management styles. Therefore, the present three-wave longitudinal study focuses on how parenting and adolescents' reactance relates to adolescents' conflict management styles and conflict frequency with mothers over time, and whether reactance may also explain the associations between parenting and certain conflict variables. We addressed these research questions by using a hybrid cross-lagged panel model with parenting as a latent variable (i.e., supportive parenting) and the other variables as manifest variables. Supportive parenting was measured by four well-known parenting dimensions: autonomy support, responsiveness, psychological control, and harsh control. Four conflict styles were investigated: positive problem solving, withdrawal, conflict engagement, and compliance. Questionnaires were completed by 812 adolescents at three annual waves (52% girls at Time 1). Supportive parenting was associated with fewer conflicts, more positive problem solving, and less compliance and reactance over time. Reactance was associated with more conflicts, conflict engagement and withdrawal, and less compliance. We did not find evidence for the mediating role of reactance in the over-time associations between parenting and adolescents' conflict management and frequency. Both parenting and reactance appeared important and unique determinants for adolescents' conflict management styles and frequency.
青少年与父母的冲突管理方式被认为对亲子关系的质量和青少年的心理社会发展有重要影响。关于这些冲突管理技能的可能决定因素的纵向研究很少。育儿环境和青少年对母亲权威的抵触倾向预计会影响青少年的冲突管理方式。因此,本三项纵向研究重点关注育儿方式和青少年的抵触倾向如何随时间变化与青少年与母亲的冲突管理方式和冲突频率相关,以及抵触倾向是否也可以解释育儿方式与某些冲突变量之间的关联。我们使用混合交叉滞后面板模型来解决这些研究问题,该模型将育儿方式作为潜在变量(即支持性育儿),将其他变量作为显在变量。支持性育儿通过四个著名的育儿维度来衡量:自主性支持、反应性、心理控制和严厉控制。研究调查了四种冲突风格:积极解决问题、回避、冲突参与和顺从。共有 812 名青少年在三年的时间里完成了四次问卷调查(第一次调查时,女孩占 52%)。随着时间的推移,支持性育儿与冲突减少、更多积极解决问题、更少顺从和抵触倾向有关。抵触倾向与更多的冲突、冲突参与和回避以及更少的顺从有关。我们没有发现抵触倾向在育儿方式与青少年冲突管理和频率之间的随时间关联中的中介作用的证据。育儿方式和抵触倾向似乎都是青少年冲突管理方式和频率的重要且独特的决定因素。