MacLeod Kara E, Karriker-Jaffe Katherine J, Satariano William A, Kelley-Baker Tara, Lacey John H, Ragland David R
a University of California, Los Angeles , Fielding School of Public Health , Los Angeles , California.
b Alcohol Research Group , Public Health Institute , Emeryville , California.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Aug 18;18(6):566-572. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1285022. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Addressing drinking and driving remains a challenge in the United States. The present study aims to provide feedback on driving under the influence (DUI) in California by assessing whether drinking and driving behavior is associated with the DUI arrest rates in the city in which the driver lives; whether this is due to perceptions that one can get arrested for this behavior; and whether this differed by those drivers who would be most affected by deterrence efforts (those most likely to drink outside the home).
This study consisted of a 2012 roadside survey of 1,147 weekend nighttime drivers in California. City DUI arrest rates for 2009-2011 were used as an indicator of local enforcement efforts. Population average logistic modeling was conducted modeling the odds of perceived high arrest likelihood for DUI and drinking and driving behavior within the past year.
As the DUI arrest rates for the city in which the driver lives increased, perceived high risk of DUI arrest increased. There was no significant relationship between either city DUI arrest rates or perceived high risk of DUI arrest with self-reported drinking and driving behavior in the full sample. Among a much smaller sample of those most likely to drink outside the home, self-reported drinking and driving behavior was negatively associated with DUI arrests rates in their city of residence but this was not mediated by perceptions.
The results of the present study suggest that perceptions are correlated with one aspect of DUI efforts in one's community. Those who were more likely to drink outside the home could be behaviorally influenced by these efforts.
在美国,解决酒后驾车问题仍然是一项挑战。本研究旨在通过评估酒后驾车行为是否与驾驶员居住城市的酒后驾车逮捕率相关;这是否是由于人们认为这种行为会导致被捕;以及那些最受威慑措施影响的驾驶员(那些最有可能在家庭以外饮酒的人)的情况是否有所不同,来提供关于加利福尼亚州酒后驾车的反馈。
本研究包括2012年对加利福尼亚州1147名周末夜间驾驶员的路边调查。2009 - 2011年城市酒后驾车逮捕率被用作当地执法力度的指标。进行总体平均逻辑建模,以模拟过去一年中感知到的酒后驾车高逮捕可能性以及酒后驾车行为的几率。
随着驾驶员居住城市的酒后驾车逮捕率上升,感知到的酒后驾车高逮捕风险也增加。在整个样本中,城市酒后驾车逮捕率或感知到的酒后驾车高逮捕风险与自我报告的酒后驾车行为之间均无显著关系。在一个小得多的最有可能在家庭以外饮酒的样本中,自我报告的酒后驾车行为与他们居住城市的酒后驾车逮捕率呈负相关,但这并非由感知所介导。
本研究结果表明,感知与所在社区酒后驾车措施的一个方面相关。那些更有可能在家庭以外饮酒的人可能会在行为上受到这些措施的影响。