Grofe Adam, Qu Zexing, Truhlar Donald G, Li Hui, Gao Jiali
Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University , Changchun, Jilin Province 130023, China.
Department of Chemistry and Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Mar 14;13(3):1176-1187. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01176. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
We describe a diabatic-at-construction (DAC) strategy for defining diabatic states to determine the adiabatic ground and excited electronic states and their potential energy surfaces using the multistate density functional theory (MSDFT). The DAC approach differs in two fundamental ways from the adiabatic-to-diabatic (ATD) procedures that transform a set of preselected adiabatic electronic states to a new representation. (1) The DAC states are defined in the first computation step to form an active space, whose configuration interaction produces the adiabatic ground and excited states in the second step of MSDFT. Thus, they do not result from a similarity transformation of the adiabatic states as in the ATD procedure; they are the basis for producing the adiabatic states. The appropriateness and completeness of the DAC active space can be validated by comparison with experimental observables of the ground and excited states. (2) The DAC diabatic states are defined using the valence bond characters of the asymptotic dissociation limits of the adiabatic states of interest, and they are strictly maintained at all molecular geometries. Consequently, DAC diabatic states have specific and well-defined physical and chemical meanings that can be used for understanding the nature of the adiabatic states and their energetic components. Here we present results for the four lowest singlet states of LiH and compare them to a well-tested ATD diabatization method, namely the 3-fold way; the comparison reveals both similarities and differences between the ATD diabatic states and the orthogonalized DAC diabatic states. Furthermore, MSDFT can provide a quantitative description of the ground and excited states for LiH with multiple strongly and weakly avoided curve crossings spanning over 10 Å of interatomic separation.
我们描述了一种构建时非绝热(DAC)策略,用于定义非绝热态,以便使用多态密度泛函理论(MSDFT)确定绝热基态和激发电子态及其势能面。DAC方法在两个基本方面与将一组预选绝热电子态转换为新表示形式的绝热到非绝热(ATD)程序不同。(1)DAC态在第一个计算步骤中定义以形成一个活性空间,其组态相互作用在MSDFT的第二步中产生绝热基态和激发态。因此,它们不像ATD程序那样由绝热态的相似变换产生;它们是产生绝热态的基础。DAC活性空间的适当性和完整性可以通过与基态和激发态的实验可观测量进行比较来验证。(2)DAC非绝热态使用感兴趣的绝热态的渐近解离极限的价键特征来定义,并且它们在所有分子几何构型下都严格保持。因此,DAC非绝热态具有特定且明确的物理和化学意义,可用于理解绝热态的性质及其能量成分。在这里,我们展示了LiH的四个最低单重态的结果,并将它们与一种经过充分测试的ATD非绝热化方法(即三重方法)进行比较;比较揭示了ATD非绝热态和正交化DAC非绝热态之间的异同。此外,MSDFT可以对LiH的基态和激发态进行定量描述,其中多个强和弱避免的曲线交叉跨越超过10 Å的原子间距离。