Suppr超能文献

将常见失语症评估映射到潜在认知过程及其神经基质。

Mapping Common Aphasia Assessments to Underlying Cognitive Processes and Their Neural Substrates.

作者信息

Lacey Elizabeth H, Skipper-Kallal Laura M, Xing Shihui, Fama Mackenzie E, Turkeltaub Peter E

机构信息

1 Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

2 MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 May;31(5):442-450. doi: 10.1177/1545968316688797. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the relationships between clinical tests, the processes they measure, and the brain networks underlying them, is critical in order for clinicians to move beyond aphasia syndrome classification toward specification of individual language process impairments.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the cognitive, language, and neuroanatomical factors underlying scores of commonly used aphasia tests.

METHODS

Twenty-five behavioral tests were administered to a group of 38 chronic left hemisphere stroke survivors and a high-resolution magnetic resonance image was obtained. Test scores were entered into a principal components analysis to extract the latent variables (factors) measured by the tests. Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping was used to localize lesions associated with the factor scores.

RESULTS

The principal components analysis yielded 4 dissociable factors, which we labeled Word Finding/Fluency, Comprehension, Phonology/Working Memory Capacity, and Executive Function. While many tests loaded onto the factors in predictable ways, some relied heavily on factors not commonly associated with the tests. Lesion symptom mapping demonstrated discrete brain structures associated with each factor, including frontal, temporal, and parietal areas extending beyond the classical language network. Specific functions mapped onto brain anatomy largely in correspondence with modern neural models of language processing.

CONCLUSIONS

An extensive clinical aphasia assessment identifies 4 independent language functions, relying on discrete parts of the left middle cerebral artery territory. A better understanding of the processes underlying cognitive tests and the link between lesion and behavior may lead to improved aphasia diagnosis, and may yield treatments better targeted to an individual's specific pattern of deficits and preserved abilities.

摘要

背景

了解临床测试、它们所测量的过程以及其背后的脑网络之间的关系,对于临床医生超越失语症综合征分类,进而明确个体语言加工障碍至关重要。

目的

了解常用失语症测试分数背后的认知、语言和神经解剖学因素。

方法

对38名慢性左半球中风幸存者进行了25项行为测试,并获取了高分辨率磁共振图像。将测试分数输入主成分分析,以提取测试所测量的潜在变量(因素)。采用多变量病变-症状映射来定位与因素分数相关的病变。

结果

主成分分析产生了4个可分离的因素,我们将其标记为词汇查找/流畅性、理解、音韵学/工作记忆容量和执行功能。虽然许多测试以可预测的方式加载到这些因素上,但有些测试严重依赖于通常与该测试无关的因素。病变症状映射显示了与每个因素相关的离散脑结构,包括超出经典语言网络的额叶、颞叶和顶叶区域。特定功能映射到脑解剖结构上,在很大程度上与现代语言加工神经模型一致。

结论

广泛的临床失语症评估确定了4种独立的语言功能,依赖于左大脑中动脉区域的不同部分。更好地理解认知测试背后的过程以及病变与行为之间的联系,可能会改善失语症的诊断,并可能产生更有针对性地针对个体特定缺陷模式和保留能力的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Mapping Common Aphasia Assessments to Underlying Cognitive Processes and Their Neural Substrates.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 May;31(5):442-450. doi: 10.1177/1545968316688797. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke.
Brain. 2016 Jan;139(Pt 1):227-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv323. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
4
Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures.
Brain. 2014 Dec;137(Pt 12):3248-66. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu286. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
5
Executive control deficits and lesion correlates in acute left hemisphere stroke survivors with and without aphasia.
Brain Imaging Behav. 2022 Apr;16(2):868-877. doi: 10.1007/s11682-021-00580-y. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
6
Noun and verb processing in aphasia: Behavioural profiles and neural correlates.
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jan 31;18:215-230. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.023. eCollection 2018.
7
Triangulation of language-cognitive impairments, naming errors and their neural bases post-stroke.
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Nov 6;17:465-473. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.037. eCollection 2018.
8
Domains of Health-Related Quality of Life Are Associated With Specific Deficits and Lesion Locations in Chronic Aphasia.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Jul;35(7):634-643. doi: 10.1177/15459683211017507. Epub 2021 May 21.
10
Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech.
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6668-79. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4396-15.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Lesion-Induced Changes to the Network Controllability of the Right Pars Triangularis in Aphasia.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Sep 2;6. doi: 10.1162/nol.a.11. eCollection 2025.
3
Causal Lesion Evidence for Two Motor Speech Coordination Networks in the Brain.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 6:2025.06.05.658124. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.05.658124.
4
Using unsupervised dimensionality reduction to identify lesion patterns predictive of post-stroke aphasia severity.
Cortex. 2025 Jul;188:25-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.04.015. Epub 2025 May 9.
5
Non-Verbal Working Memory in Post-Stroke Motor Aphasia: A Pilot Study Using the Tactual Span.
Neurol Int. 2025 Apr 17;17(4):58. doi: 10.3390/neurolint17040058.
6
Exploring benefits of speech and language therapy interventions for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A qualitative study.
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 20;11(3):e41373. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41373. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
7
Four dimensions of naturalistic language production in aphasia after stroke.
Brain. 2025 Jan 7;148(1):291-312. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae195.
8
The role of cognitive control and naming in aphasia.
Biol Futur. 2024 Mar;75(1):129-143. doi: 10.1007/s42977-024-00212-8. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
9
Neuroanatomy of post-stroke depression: the association between symptom clusters and lesion location.
Brain Commun. 2023 Oct 25;5(5):fcad275. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad275. eCollection 2023.
10
Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke.
Cortex. 2023 Oct;167:335-350. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Trail Making Test Elucidates Neural Substrates of Specific Poststroke Executive Dysfunctions.
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2755-61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009936. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
3
Bridging computational approaches to speech production: The semantic-lexical-auditory-motor model (SLAM).
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):339-52. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0903-7.
4
The Wernicke conundrum and the anatomy of language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia.
Brain. 2015 Aug;138(Pt 8):2423-37. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv154. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
5
Exploring the factor structure of neurocognitive measures in older individuals.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0124229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124229. eCollection 2015.
6
Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion-symptom mapping.
Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 16;6:6762. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7762.
8
Treatment of poststroke aphasia: current practice and new directions.
Semin Neurol. 2014 Nov;34(5):504-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396004. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures.
Brain. 2014 Dec;137(Pt 12):3248-66. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu286. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
10
Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping using support vector regression.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Dec;35(12):5861-76. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22590. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验