• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient characteristics associated with poor inhaler technique among a cohort of patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者队列中与吸入技术不佳相关的患者特征。
Respir Med. 2017 Feb;123:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
2
Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸入器使用技术。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jul 8;10:1291-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S85681. eCollection 2015.
3
Effectiveness of Interventions to Teach Metered-Dose and Diskus Inhaler Techniques. A Randomized Trial.定量气雾剂和都保吸入器技术教学干预措施的有效性:一项随机试验
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Jun;13(6):816-24. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-603OC.
4
Technical Evaluation of Soft Mist Inhaler Use in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.软雾吸入器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的使用技术评估:一项横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 22;15:1471-1479. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S253338. eCollection 2020.
5
Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD--an assessment of inhaler technique and patient preferences.哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的吸入装置——吸入技术及患者偏好评估
Respir Med. 2014 Jul;108(7):968-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 10.
6
A comparative analysis of errors in inhaler technique among COPD versus asthma patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者与哮喘患者吸入器技术错误的比较分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Sep 24;13:2941-2947. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S178951. eCollection 2018.
7
Pharmacists' training to improve inhaler technique of patients with COPD in Vietnam.越南药剂师提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器使用技术的培训。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 11;13:1863-1872. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S163826. eCollection 2018.
8
A randomised open-label cross-over study of inhaler errors, preference and time to achieve correct inhaler use in patients with COPD or asthma: comparison of ELLIPTA with other inhaler devices.一项比较 Ellipta 与其他吸入器设备的在 COPD 或哮喘患者中发生的吸入器错误、偏好以及达到正确使用吸入器时间的随机、开放标签、交叉研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 24;26:16079. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.79.
9
Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD patients - a prospective cross-sectional study on inhaler preferences and error rates.哮喘和 COPD 患者的吸入器设备 - 关于吸入器偏好和错误率的前瞻性横断面研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01246-z.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of inhalation device use among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入装置使用的知识、态度和实践
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11852-8.
2
Effect of Gamification on Improved Adherence to Inhaled Medications in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.游戏化对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入药物依从性的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 14;27:e65309. doi: 10.2196/65309.
3
Risk Factors Associated with Misuse of Soft Mist Inhaler in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者软雾吸入器误用的相关危险因素。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 May 31;19:1225-1232. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S458200. eCollection 2024.
4
Influence of ethnicity on adherence to nonsurgical interventions for COPD: a scoping review.种族对慢性阻塞性肺疾病非手术干预依从性的影响:一项范围综述
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Nov 13;9(6). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00421-2023. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Effectiveness of an educational intervention about inhalation technique in healthcare professionals in primary care: a cluster randomized trial.针对基层医疗保健专业人员的吸入技术教育干预措施的有效性:一项整群随机试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 17;14:1266095. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1266095. eCollection 2023.
6
Prevalence and Factors Affecting Appropriate Inhaler Use in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Study.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器正确使用情况的患病率及影响因素:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4420. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134420.
7
Cognitive impairment according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment independently predicts the ability of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients to maintain proper inhaler technique.根据蒙特利尔认知评估,认知障碍可独立预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者维持适当吸入器技术的能力。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02448-x.
8
The Role of the Pharmacist in Inhaler Selection and Education in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.药剂师在慢性阻塞性肺疾病吸入器选择与教育中的作用
J Pharm Technol. 2021 Apr;37(2):95-106. doi: 10.1177/8755122520937649. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
Self-reported COPD Medication Use and Adherence in the COPD Foundation Patient- Powered Registry Network.慢性阻塞性肺疾病基金会患者驱动注册网络中自我报告的慢性阻塞性肺疾病药物使用情况及依从性
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2021 Oct 28;8(4):474-487. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0252.
10
Effectiveness of one-on-one coaching in improving pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) technique among COPD patients: a prospective clinical study.一对一辅导对改善 COPD 患者压力定量气雾剂(pMDI)技术的效果:一项前瞻性临床研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01627-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Irregular and Ineffective: A Quantitative Observational Study of the Time and Technique of Inhaler Use.不规则且无效:一项关于吸入器使用时间和技术的定量观察性研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;4(5):900-909.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.07.009.
2
Inhalation device requirements for patients' inhalation maneuvers.患者吸入动作对吸入装置的要求。
Respir Med. 2016 Sep;118:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Clinical Significance of Symptoms in Smokers with Preserved Pulmonary Function.肺功能正常的吸烟者症状的临床意义
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 12;374(19):1811-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505971.
4
Effectiveness of Interventions to Teach Metered-Dose and Diskus Inhaler Techniques. A Randomized Trial.定量气雾剂和都保吸入器技术教学干预措施的有效性:一项随机试验
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Jun;13(6):816-24. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-603OC.
5
Salmeterol/fluticasone through breath-actuated inhaler versus pMDI: a randomized, double-blind, 12 weeks study.沙美特罗/氟替卡松通过呼吸驱动吸入器与压力定量吸入器的比较:一项随机、双盲、为期12周的研究。
J Asthma. 2015;52(10):1065-72. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1050499. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
6
Assessment of inhaler techniques employed by patients with respiratory diseases in southern Brazil: a population-based study.巴西南部呼吸系统疾病患者吸入器技术使用情况评估:一项基于人群的研究。
J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Oct;40(5):513-20. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132014000500007.
7
Multicenter study comparing case definitions used to identify patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.比较用于识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的病例定义的多中心研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 1;190(9):989-95. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201406-1166OC.
8
Stakeholder priorities for comparative effectiveness research in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a workshop report.利益相关者对慢性阻塞性肺疾病比较有效性研究的优先考虑:一个研讨会报告。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 1;187(3):320-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201206-0994WS. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
9
Lower health literacy is associated with poorer health status and outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.低健康素养与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的健康状况和预后较差有关。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):74-81. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2177-3. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
10
Inhaler devices for asthma: a call for action in a neglected field.用于哮喘的吸入装置:呼吁在一个被忽视的领域采取行动。
Eur Respir J. 2011 May;37(5):982-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00150910.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者队列中与吸入技术不佳相关的患者特征。

Patient characteristics associated with poor inhaler technique among a cohort of patients with COPD.

作者信息

Melzer Anne C, Ghassemieh Bijan J, Gillespie Suzanne E, Lindenauer Peter K, McBurnie Mary Ann, Mularski Richard A, Naureckas Edward T, Vollmer William M, Au David H

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Washington, USA; Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound, USA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Mailstop S-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Washington, USA.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2017 Feb;123:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2016.12.011
PMID:28137488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5310832/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inhaled therapies are the cornerstone of pharmacologic management for COPD. Each device requires a unique series of steps to be most effective, making appropriate instruction in inhaler technique a key part of the management of COPD.

OBJECTIVES

Examine characteristics of patients and devices associated with poor technique among patients with COPD.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of subjects with COPD using at least one of: metered dose inhaler, Advair Diskus, Spiriva Handihaler, identified from the COPD Outcomes-based Network for Clinical Effectiveness and Research Translation (CONCERT) registry. Technique was assessed face-to-face using manufacturer-provided dummy inhalers, with standardized checklists for each device. We used logistic regression to model associations with poor inhaler technique, defined as an error in ≥20% of the steps, as a function of patient characteristics, with educational attainment the primary predictor.

RESULTS

688 individuals meet eligibility criteria, 65.5% had poor technique for at least one device. In adjusted analyses, Black race was associated with poor technique (OR 3.25, 95%CI 1.86-5.67) while greater than high school education was associated with decreased odds of poor technique (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.17-0.70 for trade school/some college, OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.11-0.61 for college or more, p ≤ 0.001 for test of linear trend). The percentage of errors varied between devices, with subjects making proportionally the most errors for MDIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor inhaler technique is common among individuals with COPD, varies between devices, and is associated with race and educational attainment. Tailored educational interventions to teach inhaler technique should be part of the process of initiating and monitoring inhaled therapies.

摘要

背景

吸入疗法是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)药物治疗的基石。每种吸入装置都需要一系列独特的步骤才能达到最佳效果,因此正确指导吸入器使用技术是COPD管理的关键部分。

目的

研究COPD患者中与吸入技术不佳相关的患者及装置特征。

方法

对慢性阻塞性肺疾病结局临床有效性和研究转化网络(CONCERT)登记处中使用以下至少一种吸入装置的受试者进行横断面研究:定量吸入器、舒利迭准纳器、思力华能倍乐。使用制造商提供的模拟吸入器进行面对面技术评估,并为每种装置制定标准化检查表。我们使用逻辑回归模型,将吸入技术不佳(定义为≥20%的步骤存在错误)与患者特征的关系建模,以教育程度作为主要预测因素。

结果

688名个体符合纳入标准,65.5%的人至少有一种装置的使用技术不佳。在调整分析中,黑人种族与技术不佳相关(比值比[OR]3.25,95%置信区间[CI]1.86 - 5.67),而高中以上学历与技术不佳几率降低相关(职业学校/大专学历者的OR为0.35,95%CI为0.17 - 0.70;大学及以上学历者的OR为0.25,95%CI为0.11 - 0.61;线性趋势检验p≤0.001)。不同装置的错误百分比各不相同,定量吸入器的受试者错误比例最高。

结论

吸入技术不佳在COPD患者中很常见,因装置而异,且与种族和教育程度有关。针对吸入器使用技术的定制教育干预应成为启动和监测吸入疗法过程的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd48/5310832/e6f07b913d8f/nihms841441f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd48/5310832/6a17f4a8cd82/nihms841441f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd48/5310832/e6f07b913d8f/nihms841441f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd48/5310832/6a17f4a8cd82/nihms841441f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd48/5310832/e6f07b913d8f/nihms841441f2.jpg