Suppr超能文献

双相抑郁的深部经颅磁刺激治疗:一项双盲、随机、平行分组、假刺激对照临床试验的结果。

Treatment of Bipolar Depression with Deep TMS: Results from a Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN-EMT), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Mood Disorders Unit (GRUDA), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Dec;42(13):2593-2601. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.26. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Abstract

Bipolar depression (BD) is a highly prevalent condition with limited therapeutic options. Deep (H1-coil) transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) is a novel TMS modality with established efficacy for unipolar depression. We conducted a randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dTMS in treatment-resistant BD patients. Patients received 20 sessions of active or sham dTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (H1-coil, 55 18 Hz 2 s 120% MT trains). The primary outcome was changes in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) from baseline to endpoint (week 4). Secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to the end of the follow-up phase (week 8), and response and remission rates. Safety was assessed using a dTMS adverse effects questionnaire and the Young Mania Rating Scale to assess treatment-emergent mania switch (TEMS). Out of 50 patients, 43 finished the trial. There were 2 and 5 dropouts in the sham and active groups, respectively. Active dTMS was superior to sham at end point (difference favoring dTMS=4.88; 95% CI 0.43 to 9.32, p=0.03) but not at follow-up. There was also a trend for greater response rates in the active (48%) vs sham (24%) groups (OR=2.92; 95% CI=0.87 to 9.78, p=0.08). Remission rates were not statistically different. No TEMS episodes were observed. Deep TMS is a potentially effective and well-tolerated add-on therapy in resistant bipolar depressed patients receiving adequate pharmacotherapy.

摘要

双相抑郁(BD)是一种高发疾病,治疗选择有限。深部(H1 线圈)经颅磁刺激(dTMS)是一种新的 TMS 模式,已被证实对单相抑郁有效。我们进行了一项随机假对照试验,以评估 dTMS 对治疗抵抗性 BD 患者的疗效和安全性。患者接受左背外侧前额叶皮层(H1 线圈,55 18 Hz 2 s 120% MT 训练)的 20 次主动或假 dTMS 治疗。主要结局是从基线到终点(第 4 周)时 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)的变化。次要结局是从基线到随访阶段结束(第 8 周)的变化,以及反应和缓解率。使用 dTMS 不良反应问卷和 Young 躁狂评定量表评估治疗出现的躁狂转换(TEMS)来评估安全性。在 50 名患者中,有 43 名完成了试验。假刺激组和真刺激组分别有 2 名和 5 名脱落。在终点时,真刺激组优于假刺激组(有利于真刺激组的差值=4.88;95%CI 0.43 至 9.32,p=0.03),但在随访时无差异。在真刺激组(48%)和假刺激组(24%)中,反应率也有更高的趋势(OR=2.92;95%CI=0.87 至 9.78,p=0.08)。缓解率无统计学差异。未观察到 TEMS 发作。深部 TMS 是一种潜在有效的、耐受良好的附加治疗方法,适用于接受充分药物治疗的抵抗性双相抑郁患者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Ketamine for bipolar depression: an updated systematic review.氯胺酮治疗双相抑郁:一项更新的系统评价
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2023 Sep 26;13:20451253231202723. doi: 10.1177/20451253231202723. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Are there subtypes of bipolar depression?双相抑郁有亚型吗?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Sep;134(3):260-7. doi: 10.1111/acps.12615. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Screening for bipolar disorder: lessons not yet learned.双相情感障碍的筛查:尚未吸取的教训。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2016 Aug;19(3):e16. doi: 10.1136/eb-2016-102374. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验