• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我调节、合作学习与学业自我效能感:预防学业失败的相互作用

Self-Regulation, Cooperative Learning, and Academic Self-Efficacy: Interactions to Prevent School Failure.

作者信息

Fernandez-Rio Javier, Cecchini Jose A, Méndez-Gimenez Antonio, Mendez-Alonso David, Prieto Jose A

机构信息

Department of Educational Science, University of Oviedo Oviedo, Spain.

Facultad Padre Ossó, University of Oviedo Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 19;8:22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00022. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00022
PMID:28154544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5243853/
Abstract

Learning to learn and learning to cooperate are two important goals for individuals. Moreover, self regulation has been identified as fundamental to prevent school failure. The goal of the present study was to assess the interactions between self-regulated learning, cooperative learning and academic self-efficacy in secondary education students experiencing cooperative learning as the main pedagogical approach for at least one school year. 2.513 secondary education students (1.308 males, 1.205 females), 12-17 years old ( = 13.85, = 1.29), enrolled in 17 different schools belonging to the National Network of Schools on Cooperative Learning in Spain agreed to participate. They all had experienced this pedagogical approach a minimum of one school year. Participants were asked to complete the cooperative learning questionnaire, the strategies to control the study questionnaire and the global academic self-efficacy questionnaire. Participants were grouped based on their perceptions on cooperative learning and self-regulated learning in their classes. A combination of hierarchical and -means cluster analyses was used. Results revealed a four-cluster solution: cluster one included students with low levels of cooperative learning, self-regulated learning and academic self-efficacy, cluster two included students with high levels of cooperative learning, self-regulated learning and academic self-efficacy, cluster three included students with high levels of cooperative learning, low levels of self-regulated learning and intermediate-low levels of academic self-efficacy, and, finally, cluster four included students with high levels of self-regulated learning, low levels of cooperative learning, and intermediate-high levels of academic self-efficacy. Self-regulated learning was found more influential than cooperative learning on students' academic self-efficacy. In cooperative learning contexts students interact through different types of regulations: self, co, and shared. Educators should be aware of these interactions, symmetrical or asymmetrical, because they determine the quality and quantity of the students' participation and achievements, and they are key elements to prevent school failure.

摘要

学会学习和学会合作是个人的两个重要目标。此外,自我调节已被视为预防学业失败的基础。本研究的目的是评估在至少一学年中将合作学习作为主要教学方法的中学生中,自我调节学习、合作学习和学业自我效能之间的相互作用。西班牙全国合作学习学校网络中的17所不同学校的2513名中学生(1308名男生,1205名女生),年龄在12至17岁之间(平均年龄=13.85,标准差=1.29)同意参与研究。他们都至少经历过一学年这种教学方法。参与者被要求完成合作学习问卷、学习控制策略问卷和整体学业自我效能问卷。参与者根据他们对课堂上合作学习和自我调节学习的认知进行分组。采用了分层聚类分析和均值聚类分析相结合的方法。结果显示有四类分组:第一组包括合作学习、自我调节学习和学业自我效能水平较低的学生;第二组包括合作学习、自我调节学习和学业自我效能水平较高的学生;第三组包括合作学习水平较高、自我调节学习水平较低且学业自我效能处于中低水平的学生;最后,第四组包括自我调节学习水平较高、合作学习水平较低且学业自我效能处于中高水平的学生。研究发现自我调节学习对学生的学业自我效能比合作学习更具影响力。在合作学习环境中,学生通过不同类型的调节进行互动:自我调节、共同调节和共享调节。教育工作者应该意识到这些对称或不对称的相互作用,因为它们决定了学生参与和成绩的质量与数量,并且是预防学业失败的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Self-Regulation, Cooperative Learning, and Academic Self-Efficacy: Interactions to Prevent School Failure.自我调节、合作学习与学业自我效能感:预防学业失败的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 19;8:22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00022. eCollection 2017.
2
Effects of an 8-Week Cooperative Learning Intervention on Physical Education Students' Task and Self-Approach Goals, and Emotional Intelligence.8 周合作学习干预对体育教育学生任务和自我趋近目标及情绪智力的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 23;18(1):61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010061.
3
Uncovering the Nexus Between Cooperative Learning Contexts and Achievement Goals in Physical Education.揭示体育教育中合作学习环境与成就目标之间的关系。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Aug;128(4):1821-1835. doi: 10.1177/00315125211016806. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
What Are the Effects of Self-Regulation Phases and Strategies for Chinese Students? A Meta-Analysis of Two Decades Research of the Association Between Self-Regulation and Academic Performance.自我调节阶段和策略对中国学生有何影响?对自我调节与学业成绩之间关联的二十年研究的元分析。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02434. eCollection 2018.
5
The effects of cooperative learning on trait emotional intelligence and academic achievement of Spanish primary school students.合作学习对西班牙小学生特质情绪智力和学业成绩的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Sep;91(3):928-949. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12400. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Academic and social achievement goals: Their additive, interactive, and specialized effects on school functioning.学术和社会成就目标:它们对学校功能的累加、交互和特殊影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Mar;86(1):37-56. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12085. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
The Impact of Cooperative Learning on University Students' Academic Goals.合作学习对大学生学业目标的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:787210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210. eCollection 2021.
8
Sense of coherence, self-regulated learning and academic performance in first year nursing students: A cluster analysis approach.第一学年护理专业学生的综合感知能力、自我调节学习能力与学业表现:一种聚类分析方法。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Mar;17:208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
Transition from Secondary School to Medical School: The Role of Self-Study and Self-Regulated Learning Skills in Freshman Burnout.从中学到医学院的过渡:自主学习和自我调节学习技能在大一新生倦怠中的作用。
Acta Med Port. 2016 Dec 30;29(12):803-808. doi: 10.20344/amp.8350.
10
Young University Students' Academic Self-Regulation Profiles and Their Associated Procrastination: Autonomous Functioning Requires Self-Regulated Operations.青年大学生的学业自我调节概况及其相关的拖延行为:自主运作需要自我调节操作。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00354. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Effects of E-learning Blended with Collaborative Learning and Lecture-Based Teaching Approaches on Academic Self-Efficacy among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.电子学习与协作学习及基于讲座的教学方法相结合对本科护生学业自我效能感影响的比较:一项准实验研究
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Apr 1;12(2):102-110. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2024.99100.1828. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Relationship between technology acceptance model, self-regulation strategies, and academic self-efficacy with academic performance and perceived learning among college students during remote education.远程教育期间大学生的技术接受模型、自我调节策略、学业自我效能感与学业成绩及感知学习之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 29;14:1227956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227956. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.结构模型评估与修正:一种区间估计方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
2
School readiness and self-regulation: a developmental psychobiological approach.入学准备与自我调节:一种发展心理生物学方法。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:711-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015221. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
Stress- and allostasis-induced brain plasticity.应激和适应引起的大脑可塑性。
Mediation of academic self-efficacy between emotional intelligence and academic engagement in physical education undergraduate students.体育教育专业本科生中,情绪智力与学业投入之间学业自我效能感的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1178500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178500. eCollection 2023.
4
The relationship between self-regulated learning, mindful agency, and psychological resilience in Chinese master of nursing specialists: A cross-sectional study.中国护理学硕士专业学位研究生的自我调节学习、正念能动性与心理韧性之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1066806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066806. eCollection 2023.
5
The STEAM learning performance and sustainable inquiry behavior of college students in China.中国大学生的STEAM学习表现与可持续探究行为
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:975515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975515. eCollection 2022.
6
Co-operative learning, psychometric adaptation, and invariability of the academic satisfaction scale in Spanish university students.西班牙大学生学术满意度量表的合作学习、心理测量学适应性及不变性
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 21;13:864510. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864510. eCollection 2022.
7
Exploring student perceptions of their learning adaptions during the COVID-19 pandemic.探索学生对其在新冠疫情期间学习适应情况的看法。
J Chiropr Educ. 2022 Mar 1;36(1):82-93. doi: 10.7899/JCE-21-11.
8
Emotional Intelligence, Perceived Academic Self-Efficacy, and Perfectionistic Automatic Thoughts as Predictors of Aesthetic-Musical Awareness in Late Adolescence.情商、感知到的学业自我效能感和完美主义自动思维作为青少年晚期审美-音乐意识的预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:733025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733025. eCollection 2021.
9
A qualitative study on self-regulated learning among high performing medical students.一项关于优秀医学生自主学习的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02712-w.
10
The Self-Regulation of Learning - Self-Report Scale for Sport Practice: Validation of an Italian Version for Football.运动实践学习自我调节——足球运动意大利语版自我报告量表:验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 15;12:604852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604852. eCollection 2021.
Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:431-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-052209-100430.
4
Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.测量工具的多组等效性检验:流程详解
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):872-82.
5
Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten.将努力控制、执行功能和错误信念理解与幼儿园阶段新兴的数学和读写能力联系起来。
Child Dev. 2007 Mar-Apr;78(2):647-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x.
6
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
7
An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.另一种“人格描述”:大五因素结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1216-29. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216.
8
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.