Suppr超能文献

急诊科床边Quikread go® CRP检测在发热婴儿管理中的评估

Evaluation of the bedside Quikread go® CRP test in the management of febrile infants at the emergency department.

作者信息

Hernández-Bou S, Trenchs V, Vanegas M I, Valls A F, Luaces C

机构信息

Pediatric Emergency Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona, Passeig Sant Joan de Déu 2, 08940, Esplugues de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain.

Laboratory Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona, Passeig Sant Joan de Déu 2, 08940, Esplugues de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;36(7):1205-1211. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-2910-2. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

Abstract

Recently C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care tests have been developed. We aimed to validate a bedside CRP test (QuikRead go® CRP), to compare it with the laboratory CRP (ARCHITECT c8000 Abbott, Germany) test in children with fever without source (FWS), and to evaluate the optimal CRP cut-off value to identify those patients at a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI). The CRP bedside test was prospectively performed in capillary blood samples concurrently with the laboratory CRP testing for 283 well-appearing infants aged 1 to 24 months with FWS attending the emergency department (ED) between May 2013 and August 2015. The mean difference between the laboratory CRP and the QuikRead go CRP values was 0.71 mg/L (p = 0.444). Pearson's correlation coefficient between the CRPs was r = 0.929 (p < 0.001). SBI was diagnosed in 34 patients (12.0%). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve obtained was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.82-0.90) for an optimal CRP cut-off value of > 10 mg/L (sensitivity: 94.1%, specificity: 49.0%, positive predictive value: 20.1%, negative predictive value: 98.4%), as a predictor of SBI. Nearly 45% of the patients were at a low risk for SBI according to CRP value; thus, additional laboratory tests would have been hypothetically avoided. There was a very strong, positive correlation between the QuikRead go CRP test and laboratory CRP determination. The QuikRead go CRP test provides reliable results to rule out SBI. Its implementation at the ED would improve the management of infants with FWS.

摘要

最近,即时检测C反应蛋白(CRP)的方法已被开发出来。我们旨在验证一种床旁CRP检测方法(QuikRead go® CRP),将其与实验室CRP检测方法(德国雅培ARCHITECT c8000)在不明原因发热(FWS)儿童中进行比较,并评估用于识别严重细菌感染(SBI)高危患者的最佳CRP临界值。在2013年5月至2015年8月期间,对283名年龄在1至24个月、外表良好、因FWS到急诊科就诊的婴儿,同时在毛细血管血样中前瞻性地进行CRP床旁检测和实验室CRP检测。实验室CRP值与QuikRead go CRP值之间的平均差异为0.71mg/L(p = 0.444)。两种CRP检测结果的Pearson相关系数为r = 0.929(p < 0.001)。34例患者(12.0%)被诊断为SBI。作为SBI的预测指标,当CRP临界值>10mg/L时,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.87(95%CI:0.82 - 0.90)(敏感性:94.1%,特异性:49.0%,阳性预测值:20.1%,阴性预测值:98.4%)。根据CRP值,近45%的患者SBI风险较低;因此,理论上可以避免进行额外的实验室检测。QuikRead go CRP检测与实验室CRP测定之间存在非常强的正相关。QuikRead go CRP检测为排除SBI提供了可靠的结果。在急诊科采用该检测方法将改善对FWS婴儿的管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验