• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奢侈品牌标签和“绿色”标签是社会地位的高成本信号吗?一项扩展复制研究。

Are Luxury Brand Labels and "Green" Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication.

作者信息

Berger Joël

机构信息

Utrecht University, Department of Sociology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

University of Zurich, Institute of Sociology, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):e0170216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170216. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170216
PMID:28170399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5295666/
Abstract

Costly signaling theory provides an explanation for why humans are willing to a pay a premium for conspicuous products such as luxury brand-labeled clothing or conspicuous environmentally friendly cars. According to the theory, the extra cost of such products is a signal of social status and wealth and leads to advantages in social interactions for the signaler. A previous study found positive evidence for the case of luxury brand labels. However, an issue of this study was that some of the experiments were not conducted in a perfectly double-blind manner. I resolved this by replicating variations of the original design in a double-blind procedure. Additionally, besides the luxury label condition, I introduced a "green" label condition. Thus, the hypothesis that signaling theory is able to explain pro-environmental behavior was tested for the first time in a natural field setting. Further, I conducted experiments in both average and below-average socioeconomic neighborhoods, where, according to signaling theory, the effects of luxury signals should be even stronger. In contrast to the original study, I did not find positive effects of the luxury brand label in any of the five experiments. Nor did I find evidence for a green-signaling effect. Moreover, in poor neighborhoods a negative tendency of the luxury label actually became evident. This suggests that a signaling theory explanation of costly labels must take into account the characteristics of the observers, e.g. their social status.

摘要

成本信号理论解释了为什么人类愿意为诸如奢侈品牌服装或引人注目的环保汽车等显眼产品支付溢价。根据该理论,此类产品的额外成本是社会地位和财富的信号,会给发出信号者在社交互动中带来优势。先前的一项研究为奢侈品牌标签的情况提供了积极证据。然而,该研究存在一个问题,即部分实验并非以完全双盲的方式进行。我通过在双盲程序中复制原始设计的变体解决了这个问题。此外,除了奢侈品牌标签条件,我还引入了“绿色”标签条件。因此,信号理论能够解释亲环境行为这一假设首次在自然场景中得到检验。此外,我在社会经济水平处于平均及以下的社区都进行了实验,根据信号理论,在这些社区中奢侈信号的影响应该会更强。与原始研究不同,在这五个实验中,我均未发现奢侈品牌标签产生积极影响。我也未找到绿色信号效应的证据。此外,在贫困社区,奢侈品牌标签的负面倾向实际上变得明显。这表明,对于昂贵标签的信号理论解释必须考虑观察者的特征,例如他们的社会地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/2621b44622ec/pone.0170216.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/c3e296e2510e/pone.0170216.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/e06125c2c8c7/pone.0170216.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/7a37cebcebbd/pone.0170216.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/2621b44622ec/pone.0170216.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/c3e296e2510e/pone.0170216.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/e06125c2c8c7/pone.0170216.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/7a37cebcebbd/pone.0170216.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/5295666/2621b44622ec/pone.0170216.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Luxury Brand Labels and "Green" Labels Costly Signals of Social Status? An Extended Replication.奢侈品牌标签和“绿色”标签是社会地位的高成本信号吗?一项扩展复制研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):e0170216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170216. eCollection 2017.
2
The Dark Side of Luxury: Social Costs of Luxury Consumption.奢侈品的阴暗面:奢侈品消费的社会成本。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 May;45(5):767-779. doi: 10.1177/0146167218796790. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
3
Examining consumer luxury brand-related behavior intentions in a social media context: The moderating role of hedonic and utilitarian motivations.在社交媒体背景下考察消费者奢侈品品牌相关行为意向:享乐动机和实用动机的调节作用。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Mar 1;200:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
4
Social power, product conspicuousness, and the demand for luxury brand counterfeit products.社会权力、产品显著性与奢侈品牌假冒产品的需求
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;54(1):37-54. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12073. Epub 2014 May 14.
5
The role of brand trust in male customers' relationship to luxury brands.品牌信任在男性消费者与奢侈品牌关系中的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2014 Apr;114(2):609-24. doi: 10.2466/01.07.PR0.114k15w8.
6
Status-Relevant Experiences and Conspicuous Consumption - the Moderating Role of Prenatal Androgen Exposure.与地位相关的经历和炫耀性消费——产前雄激素暴露的调节作用。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Sep 20;19:E54. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.52.
7
Brand awe: A key concept for understanding consumer response to luxury and premium brands.品牌敬畏:理解消费者对奢侈和高端品牌反应的关键概念。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Mar 4;161(2):245-260. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1804313. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
Counterfeits or Shanzhai? The Role of Face and Brand Consciousness in Luxury Copycat Consumption.假冒还是山寨?面子意识和品牌意识在奢侈品仿冒消费中的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2016 Aug;119(1):181-99. doi: 10.1177/0033294116659316. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
9
"We buy what we wanna be": Understanding the effect of brand identity driven by consumer perceived value in the luxury sector.“我们购买我们想要成为的样子”:理解奢侈品行业中由消费者感知价值驱动的品牌形象的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 15;13:1002275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002275. eCollection 2022.
10
Crafting Inconspicuous Luxury Brands Through Brand Authenticity in China.通过在中国保持品牌本真打造低调奢华品牌。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:826890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826890. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the interplay of psychological entitlement, mindset, and luxury products or experience consumption.探索心理权利感、思维模式与奢侈品或体验消费之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90930-3.
2
Discovering the psychological building blocks underlying climate action-a longitudinal study of real-world activism.探索气候行动背后的心理基石——一项关于现实世界行动主义的纵向研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jun 1;9(6):210006. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210006. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the trade-off between quality and fairness in human partner choice.探索人类伴侣选择中质量与公平之间的权衡。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Nov 9;3(11):160510. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160510. eCollection 2016 Nov.
2
The evolution of magnanimity : When is it better to give than to receive?宽容的演变:何时给予比接受更好?
Hum Nat. 1998 Mar;9(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12110-998-1009-y.
3
Natural and strategic generosity as signals of trustworthiness.自然的和策略性的慷慨作为可信赖的信号。
干预措施中促进可持续行为的社会激励因素:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 8;16(12):e0260932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260932. eCollection 2021.
4
Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image.新兴旅游供应链中的绿色悖论:通过战略绿色营销定位、品牌社会责任和绿色形象实现绿色消费行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 13;18(18):9626. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189626.
5
Green when seen? No support for an effect of observability on environmental conservation in the laboratory: a registered report.观察时呈绿色?实验室中关于可观察性对环境保护影响的研究无支持证据:一项注册报告
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 1;7(4):190189. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190189. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
Diminishing personal information privacy weakens image concerns.个人信息隐私的减少削弱了形象顾虑。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 27;15(4):e0232037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232037. eCollection 2020.
7
The interplay between endorser social status and normative appeals on the endorsement effectiveness of pro-environmental behaviors.代言人社会地位与规范性诉求对环保行为认可效果的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210699. eCollection 2019.
PLoS One. 2014 May 15;9(5):e97533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097533. eCollection 2014.
4
Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games.合作者通过基于声誉的经济博弈中的伙伴选择而受益。
Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):659-62. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0209. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
5
Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.走向绿色以被看见:地位、声誉和明显的保护。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):392-404. doi: 10.1037/a0017346.
6
Promoting cooperation and trust in "noisy" situations: the power of generosity.在“嘈杂”情境中促进合作与信任:慷慨的力量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):83-103. doi: 10.1037/a0012823.
7
Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans.伴侣选择在人类中产生了竞争性利他行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 7;274(1610):749-53. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0209.
8
Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis.好人先赢:竞争性利他主义假说。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1402-13. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291006.
9
Stabilizing the earth's climate is not a losing game: supporting evidence from public goods experiments.稳定地球气候并非一场必输之局:来自公共物品实验的支持性证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 14;103(11):3994-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504902103. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
10
Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation.慈善捐赠者在间接互惠和政治声誉方面都有所收获。
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):881-3. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1964.