Stahl Bernd Carsten, Wakunuma Kutoma, Rainey Stephen, Hansen Christian
Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, School of Computer Science and Informatics, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171818. eCollection 2017.
Research on Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) often aims to provide solutions for vulnerable populations, such as individuals with diseases, conditions or disabilities that keep them from using traditional interfaces. Such research thereby contributes to the public good. This contribution to the public good corresponds to a broader drive of research and funding policy that focuses on promoting beneficial societal impact. One way of achieving this is to engage with the public. In practical terms this can be done by integrating civil society organisations (CSOs) in research. The open question at the heart of this paper is whether and how such CSO integration can transform the research and contribute to the public good. To answer this question the paper describes five detailed qualitative case studies of research projects including CSOs. The paper finds that transformative impact of CSO integration is possible but by no means assured. It provides recommendations on how transformative impact can be promoted.
脑机接口(BCI)研究通常旨在为弱势群体提供解决方案,例如患有疾病、病症或残疾而无法使用传统接口的个体。此类研究因而有助于公共利益。这种对公共利益的贡献符合研究和资助政策的更广泛趋势,该趋势侧重于促进有益的社会影响。实现这一目标的一种方式是与公众互动。实际上,可以通过将民间社会组织(CSO)纳入研究来做到这一点。本文核心的开放性问题是,这种CSO整合能否以及如何改变研究并为公共利益做出贡献。为回答这个问题,本文描述了五个包括CSO的研究项目的详细定性案例研究。本文发现,CSO整合产生变革性影响是可能的,但绝无保证。它就如何促进变革性影响提供了建议。