• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者作为合作伙伴:关于患者参与医疗保健的定性研究

Patients as partners: a qualitative study of patients' engagement in their health care.

作者信息

Pomey Marie-Pascale, Ghadiri Djahanchah P, Karazivan Philippe, Fernandez Nicolas, Clavel Nathalie

机构信息

École de santé publique, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Management, HEC Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0122499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122499. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122499
PMID:25856569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4391791/
Abstract

To advocate for patients to be more actively involved with the healthcare services they receive, particularly patients living with chronic illness, the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Montreal and its affiliated hospitals developed the Patients as Partners concept where the patient is considered a full-fledged partner of the health care delivery team and the patient's experiential knowledge is recognized. This study aims to show how patients view their engagement with healthcare professionals regarding their direct care. Using theoretical sampling, 16 semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients with chronic illness who were familiar with the concept of Patients as Partners. Data analysis followed a constructivist grounded theory approach. Patients describe themselves as proactively engaging in three types of practice, regardless of health professionals' openness to their role as partners. The first is a process of continuous learning that allows them to acquire experiential knowledge about their health, as well as scientific information and technical know-how. The second involves their assessment of the healthcare they receive, in terms of its quality and how it aligns with their personal preferences. It includes their assessment of the quality of their relationship with the health professional and of the latter's scientific knowledge and technical know-how. The third type, adaptation practices, builds on patients' learning and assessments to compensate for and adapt to what has been perceived as optimal or non-optimal health or healthcare circumstances. Patients appear to play a more active and less docile role in their own direct care than suggested so far in the literature, regardless of the degree of reciprocity of the partnership or the degree to which the health professional seeks to encourage patient engagement.

摘要

为倡导患者更积极地参与他们所接受的医疗服务,尤其是慢性病患者,蒙特利尔大学医学院及其附属医院提出了“患者即伙伴”的理念,即患者被视为医疗服务团队的正式伙伴,其经验性知识得到认可。本研究旨在展示患者如何看待他们在直接护理方面与医护人员的互动。通过理论抽样,对熟悉“患者即伙伴”理念的慢性病患者进行了16次半结构化访谈。数据分析采用建构主义扎根理论方法。患者描述自己积极参与三种类型的实践,无论医护人员对他们作为伙伴的角色持何种开放态度。第一种是持续学习的过程,使他们能够获得有关自身健康的经验性知识,以及科学信息和技术诀窍。第二种是对所接受医疗服务的评估,包括服务质量以及是否符合他们的个人偏好。这包括他们对与医护人员关系质量的评估,以及对后者科学知识和技术诀窍的评估。第三种是适应实践,基于患者的学习和评估,以补偿和适应被认为是最佳或非最佳的健康或医疗状况。无论伙伴关系的互惠程度如何,也无论医护人员寻求鼓励患者参与的程度如何,患者在自己的直接护理中似乎比迄今文献中所表明的发挥着更积极、更不温顺的作用。

相似文献

1
Patients as partners: a qualitative study of patients' engagement in their health care.患者作为合作伙伴:关于患者参与医疗保健的定性研究
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0122499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122499. eCollection 2015.
2
Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review.患者与医护人员合作以确保手部卫生合规的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1645-1670. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003001.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Patient experiences of engagement with care plans and healthcare professionals' perceptions of that engagement.患者对护理计划的参与体验以及医疗保健专业人员对这种参与的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2806-y.
7
[The Montreal model: the challenges of a partnership relationship between patients and healthcare professionals].[蒙特利尔模式:患者与医疗保健专业人员之间伙伴关系的挑战]
Sante Publique. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1 Suppl):S41-50.
8
Patients' and healthcare professionals' views on pharmacogenetic testing and its future delivery in the NHS.患者与医疗保健专业人员对药物遗传学检测及其在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中的未来应用的看法。
Pharmacogenomics. 2007 Nov;8(11):1511-9. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.11.1511.
9
Sharing responsibility: municipal health professionals' approaches to goal setting with older patients with multi-morbidity - a grounded theory study.分担责任:多病症老年患者目标设定中,市级卫生专业人员的方法 - 扎根理论研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4983-3.
10
Towards a New Integrated Model for Taking Into Account the Experiential Knowledge of People With Chronic Diseases, Integrating Mediation, Therapeutic Education and Partnership: The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model.迈向一个新的综合模型,考虑患有慢性病的人的经验知识,整合调解、治疗教育和伙伴关系:扩展的慢性护理患者-专业伙伴关系模型。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70054. doi: 10.1111/hex.70054.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning Care Pathways Framework: A New Method to Implement, Learn, Replicate, and Scale up Care Pathways for and With the Patient.学习型护理路径框架:一种为患者并与患者共同实施、学习、复制和扩大护理路径的新方法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8517. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8517. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
Beyond Barriers: Achieving True Equity in Cancer Care.突破障碍:实现癌症护理的真正公平。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 12;32(6):349. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060349.
3
Patient perspectives on health care models in cardiac surgery: a qualitative evaluation.患者对心脏外科医疗模式的看法:定性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):1309. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11791-6.
4
Awareness of diagnosis and treatment plan among patients in the Accident and Emergency Department of a Nigerian tertiary hospital.尼日利亚一家三级医院急诊科患者对诊断和治疗方案的知晓情况。
Niger Med J. 2024 Sep 26;65(4):524-532. doi: 10.60787/nmj-v65i3-416. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
5
Towards a New Integrated Model for Taking Into Account the Experiential Knowledge of People With Chronic Diseases, Integrating Mediation, Therapeutic Education and Partnership: The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model.迈向一个新的综合模型,考虑患有慢性病的人的经验知识,整合调解、治疗教育和伙伴关系:扩展的慢性护理患者-专业伙伴关系模型。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70054. doi: 10.1111/hex.70054.
6
Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: Progress Made and Future Directions for Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of a Patient Safety Bundle.妊娠期重度高血压:在患者安全、质量改进及实施患者安全综合措施方面取得的进展与未来方向
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 23;13(17):4973. doi: 10.3390/jcm13174973.
7
Advancing a new model of collaborative practice: a decade of Whole Health interprofessional education across Veterans Health Administration.推进新的协作实践模式:退伍军人事务部全健康跨专业教育十年。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):987. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05945-7.
8
The Role of the Cardiac Surgery Patient in Pain Management: The Patient Perspective.心脏外科患者在疼痛管理中的作用:患者视角。
Clin Nurs Res. 2024 Sep;33(7):538-544. doi: 10.1177/10547738241273232. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
9
'Not taking medications and taking medication, it was the same thing:' perspectives of antiretroviral therapy among people hospitalised with advanced HIV disease.“不服用药物和服用药物,结果是一样的”:艾滋病毒晚期住院患者对抗逆转录病毒疗法的看法。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09729-8.
10
Professionals' Perceptions of the Colorectal Cancer Pathway: Results of a Co-Constructed Qualitative Study.专业人士对结直肠癌路径的看法:一项共同构建的定性研究结果。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14146. doi: 10.1111/hex.14146.

本文引用的文献

1
A new reliable index to measure individual deprivation: the EPICES score.一种用于衡量个体贫困程度的新的可靠指标:EPICES评分。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Aug;25(4):604-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku231. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
2
The patient-as-partner approach in health care: a conceptual framework for a necessary transition.医疗保健中的患者伙伴关系模式:必要转变的概念框架。
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):437-41. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000603.
3
Global, regional, and national incidence and mortality for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.全球、区域和国家在 1990-2013 年间艾滋病毒、结核病和疟疾的发病率和死亡率:2013 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):1005-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60844-8. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
4
A classification model of patient engagement methods and assessment of their feasibility in real-world settings.患者参与方法的分类模型及其在现实环境中的可行性评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
6
Innovating in teaching collaborative practice with a large student cohort at Université de Montréal.在蒙特利尔大学针对大量学生群体开展协作实践教学创新。
J Allied Health. 2013 Winter;42(4):e97-e106.
7
Targets for non-communicable disease: what has happened since the UN summit?非传染性疾病目标:自联合国峰会以来发生了什么?
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f3300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3300.
8
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.患者和家属参与:理解要素、制定干预措施和政策的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
9
Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature.患者参与作为医疗服务的一个新挑战:文献综述
Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:905934. doi: 10.1155/2012/905934. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
10
Priority-setting and rationing in healthcare: evidence from the English experience.医疗保健中的优先排序和配给:来自英国经验的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Sep 20.