• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的效果并未减弱:对约翰森和弗里伯格(2015 年)的再分析。

The effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression are not falling: A re-analysis of Johnsen and Friborg (2015).

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):321-325. doi: 10.1037/bul0000055.

DOI:10.1037/bul0000055
PMID:28230412
Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has a solid evidence base as an effective treatment for depression. However, a recent meta-analysis (Johnsen & Friborg, 2015) including 70 studies, showed that the effect sizes of CBT for depression have been falling between 1977 and 2014. A possible important limitation in the Johnsen and Friborg (2015) study was that they did not investigate a leveling off in the decline over time of the effectiveness of CBT for depression. We therefore reanalyzed the data reported by Johnsen and Friborg (2015) using meta-analytic regression models that allowed for a curvilinear effect of publication year and also modeled separate estimates of the decline of treatment effect before and after 1995. Our analyses showed that adding a quadratic effect of time to a linear effect of time significantly improved the meta-analytic regression models (p = .017-.027). Furthermore, significant declines were only observed between 1977 and 1995 (p = .001-.009) and not between 1995 to 2014 (p = .987-.785). We conclude that the declining effect of CBT for depression observed by Johnsen and Friborg (2015) was highly influenced by 22 studies published before 1995 and that the 48 studies published after 1995 did not demonstrate such a decline. Thus, there are no indications that CBT for depression is gradually losing its value. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)作为一种有效的抑郁症治疗方法,具有坚实的证据基础。然而,最近的一项荟萃分析(Johnsen 和 Friborg,2015)包括 70 项研究,显示 CBT 治疗抑郁症的效果大小在 1977 年至 2014 年间一直在下降。Johnsen 和 Friborg(2015)研究的一个可能重要限制是,他们没有调查 CBT 治疗抑郁症的效果随时间的推移是否趋于平稳。因此,我们使用允许出版年份呈二次曲线效应的荟萃分析回归模型,重新分析了 Johnsen 和 Friborg(2015)报告的数据,并对 1995 年前和 1995 年后治疗效果下降的单独估计进行了建模。我们的分析表明,向线性时间效应中添加二次时间效应显著改善了荟萃分析回归模型(p =.017-.027)。此外,仅在 1977 年至 1995 年之间观察到显著下降(p =.001-.009),而在 1995 年至 2014 年之间没有观察到下降(p =.987-.785)。我们得出结论,Johnsen 和 Friborg(2015)观察到的 CBT 治疗抑郁症效果下降主要受 1995 年前发表的 22 项研究的影响,而 1995 年后发表的 48 项研究并未显示出这种下降。因此,没有迹象表明 CBT 治疗抑郁症的价值正在逐渐丧失。

相似文献

1
The effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression are not falling: A re-analysis of Johnsen and Friborg (2015).认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的效果并未减弱:对约翰森和弗里伯格(2015 年)的再分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):321-325. doi: 10.1037/bul0000055.
2
The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy are not systematically falling: A revision of Johnsen and Friborg (2015).认知行为疗法的效果并非系统性下降:对约翰森和弗里伯格(2015 年)的修正。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):326-340. doi: 10.1037/bul0000062.
3
The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy as an antidepressive treatment is falling: Reply to Ljòtsson et al. (2017) and Cristea et al. (2017).认知行为疗法作为一种抗抑郁治疗方法的效果正在下降:对 Ljòtsson 等人(2017 年)和 Cristea 等人(2017 年)的回复。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):341-345. doi: 10.1037/bul0000090.
4
"The Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as an Anti-Depressive Treatment is Falling: A Meta-Analysis": Correction to Johnsen and Friborg (2015).《认知行为疗法作为抗抑郁治疗效果正在下降:一项荟萃分析》:对 Johnsen 和 Friborg(2015)的纠偏。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Mar;142(3):290. doi: 10.1037/bul0000050.
5
Cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in older people: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.老年人抑郁症的认知行为疗法:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1817-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04166.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
6
A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments.成人抑郁症的认知行为疗法的荟萃分析,单独及与其他治疗方法比较。
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;58(7):376-85. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800702.
7
Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: a meta-analysis.基层医疗中认知行为疗法治疗焦虑和抑郁的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Fam Pract. 2015 Feb;32(1):3-15. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu060. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
8
Baseline Depression Severity as Moderator of Depression Outcomes Between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.基线抑郁严重程度作为认知行为疗法与药物治疗之间抑郁结局的调节因素:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;72(11):1102-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1516.
9
CBT for children with depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis.针对有抑郁症状儿童的认知行为疗法:一项荟萃分析。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2014;43(4):275-88. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2014.947316. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
10
Effectiveness of and dropout from outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult unipolar depression: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies.门诊认知行为疗法治疗成人单相抑郁症的疗效和脱落率:非随机疗效研究的荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Feb;81(1):75-88. doi: 10.1037/a0031080.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review.重新审视认知行为疗法在刑事司法系统中减少再犯罪方面的有效性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 31;20(3):e1425. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1425. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
The Polish version of the Process-Based Assessment Tool (PBAT)-The measure of processes of change in psychological interventions.波兰版过程评估工具(PBAT)——心理干预中变化过程的衡量工具。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0304661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304661. eCollection 2024.
3
Adolescent Psychological Assistance Treatment Strategy Integrating Home-School Coordination and Network Information.
青少年心理援助治疗策略整合家校协同与网络信息。
Occup Ther Int. 2022 Jul 14;2022:6393139. doi: 10.1155/2022/6393139. eCollection 2022.
4
The Mereology of Depression-Networks of Depressive Symptoms during the Course of Psychotherapy.抑郁症的整体论:心理治疗过程中抑郁症状的网络。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 10;19(12):7131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127131.
5
Toward a Unified Framework for Positive Psychology Interventions: Evidence-Based Processes of Change in Coaching, Prevention, and Training.迈向积极心理学干预的统一框架:基于证据的教练、预防和培训中的改变过程。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;12:809362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809362. eCollection 2021.
6
Effectiveness of a tailored, integrative Internet intervention (deprexis) for depression: Updated meta-analysis.针对抑郁症的定制化、整合型互联网干预(deprexis)的有效性:更新的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228100. eCollection 2020.
7
To Mix or Not To Mix? A Meta-Method Approach to Rethinking Evaluation Practices for Improved Effectiveness and Efficiency of Psychological Therapies Illustrated With the Application of Perceptual Control Theory.混合还是不混合?一种元方法,用于重新思考评估实践,以提高心理治疗的有效性和效率,并以感知控制理论的应用为例进行说明。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 26;10:1445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01445. eCollection 2019.