Smith Andrew, Roberts Anton, Krzemieniewska-Nandwani Karolina, Eggins Liz, Cook Will, Fox Chris, Maruna Shadd, Wallace Stephanie, Szifris Kirstine
National Foundation for Education Research Slough UK.
Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 31;20(3):e1425. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1425. eCollection 2024 Sep.
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The proposed systematic review is an update to, and extension of, Lipsey et al. (2007). As such we build on their previous aims to: (i) Assess and synthesise the overall impact of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on offender recidivism; (ii) Examine possible sources of variability in the effectiveness of CBT. Data permitting, we will examine if the effectiveness of CBT varies by: (a) Characteristics of the CBT intervention (e.g., cognitive restructuring vs. cognitive skills training, group v. individual implementation; and/or custodial v. community setting, and/or), (b) Characteristics of the population (e.g., juveniles vs. adult offenders), (c) Implementation factors (e.g., implementing practitioner, use of structured/manualised approaches, delivery mode, and/or programme duration or intensity), (d) Evaluation methods (e.g., randomised vs. non-randomised research designs); (iv) Determine whether there is a decline in the effect of CBT on recidivism over time; and (v) Investigate whether there is an interaction between implementation factors and time in terms of the effect on recidivism.
这是一项坎贝尔系统评价的方案。目标如下。拟进行的系统评价是对利普西等人(2007年)研究的更新与扩展。因此,我们在他们之前的目标基础上进行:(i)评估并综合认知行为疗法(CBT)对罪犯再犯的总体影响;(ii)探究CBT有效性中可能存在差异的来源。若数据允许,我们将考察CBT的有效性是否因以下因素而异:(a)CBT干预的特征(例如,认知重构与认知技能训练、团体实施与个体实施;和/或监禁环境与社区环境等),(b)人群特征(例如,青少年与成年罪犯),(c)实施因素(例如,实施者、结构化/手册化方法的使用、交付模式,和/或项目持续时间或强度),(d)评价因素(例如,随机与非随机研究设计);(iv)确定CBT对再犯的影响是否随时间下降;以及(v)研究在对再犯的影响方面,实施因素与时间之间是否存在交互作用。