Hulbert-Williams N J, Plumpton C O, Flowers P, McHugh R, Neal R D, Semlyen J, Storey L
Chester Research Unit for the Psychology of Health (CRUPH), Department of Psychology, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jul;26(4). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12670. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
Understanding the effects of population diversity on cancer-related experiences is a priority in oncology care. Previous research demonstrates inequalities arising from variation in age, gender and ethnicity. Inequalities and sexual orientation remain underexplored. Here, we report, for the first time in the UK, a quantitative secondary analysis of the 2013 UK National Cancer Patient Experience Survey which contains 70 questions on specific aspects of care, and six on overall care experiences. 68,737 individuals responded, of whom 0.8% identified as lesbian, gay or bisexual. Controlling for age, gender and concurrent mental health comorbidity, logistic regression models applying post-estimate probability Wald tests explored response differences between heterosexual, bisexual and lesbian/gay respondents. Significant differences were found for 16 questions relating to: (1) a lack of patient-centred care and involvement in decision-making, (2) a need for health professional training and revision of information resources to negate the effects of heteronormativity and (3) evidence of substantial social isolation through cancer. These findings suggest a pattern of inequality, with less positive cancer experiences reported by lesbian, gay and (especially) bisexual respondents. Poor patient-professional communication and heteronormativity in the healthcare setting potentially explain many of the differences found. Social isolation is problematic for this group and warrants further exploration.
了解人群多样性对癌症相关经历的影响是肿瘤护理的一项重点工作。先前的研究表明,年龄、性别和种族差异会导致不平等现象。不平等现象与性取向之间的关系仍未得到充分探索。在此,我们首次在英国对2013年英国全国癌症患者体验调查进行了定量二次分析,该调查包含70个关于护理具体方面的问题以及6个关于总体护理体验的问题。68,737人做出了回应,其中0.8%的人将自己认定为女同性恋、男同性恋或双性恋者。在控制年龄、性别和并发心理健康合并症的情况下,运用估计后概率Wald检验的逻辑回归模型探讨了异性恋、双性恋以及女同性恋/男同性恋受访者之间的回答差异。在与以下方面相关的16个问题上发现了显著差异:(1)缺乏以患者为中心的护理以及参与决策的机会;(2)需要对医疗专业人员进行培训并修订信息资源,以消除异性恋规范的影响;(3)有证据表明癌症导致了严重的社会隔离。这些发现表明存在一种不平等模式,女同性恋、男同性恋以及(尤其是)双性恋受访者报告的癌症经历较不积极。患者与专业人员之间沟通不畅以及医疗环境中的异性恋规范可能是造成所发现的许多差异的原因。社会隔离对这一群体来说是个问题,值得进一步探讨。