• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

形式化 Neurath 船:在线因果学习的近似算法。

Formalizing Neurath's ship: Approximate algorithms for online causal learning.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London.

Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;124(3):301-338. doi: 10.1037/rev0000061. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1037/rev0000061
PMID:28240922
Abstract

Higher-level cognition depends on the ability to learn models of the world. We can characterize this at the computational level as a structure-learning problem with the goal of best identifying the prevailing causal relationships among a set of relata. However, the computational cost of performing exact Bayesian inference over causal models grows rapidly as the number of relata increases. This implies that the cognitive processes underlying causal learning must be substantially approximate. A powerful class of approximations that focuses on the sequential absorption of successive inputs is captured by the metaphor in philosophy of science, where theory change is cast as a stochastic and gradual process shaped as much by people's limited willingness to abandon their current theory when considering alternatives as by the ground truth they hope to approach. Inspired by this metaphor and by algorithms for approximating Bayesian inference in machine learning, we propose an algorithmic-level model of causal structure learning under which learners represent only a single global hypothesis that they update locally as they gather evidence. We propose a related scheme for understanding how, under these limitations, learners choose informative interventions that manipulate the causal system to help elucidate its workings. We find support for our approach in the analysis of 3 experiments. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

更高层次的认知依赖于学习世界模型的能力。我们可以在计算层面上把它描述为一个结构学习问题,其目标是最好地识别一组关系项之间普遍存在的因果关系。然而,随着关系项数量的增加,对因果模型进行精确贝叶斯推断的计算成本会迅速增加。这意味着因果学习背后的认知过程必须是实质性的近似。一类强大的近似方法,专注于连续吸收连续输入,被哲学中的隐喻所捕捉,其中理论变化被视为一个随机和渐进的过程,既受到人们在考虑替代方案时放弃当前理论的有限意愿的影响,也受到他们希望接近的事实真相的影响。受这一隐喻和机器学习中用于近似贝叶斯推断的算法的启发,我们提出了一个算法层面的因果结构学习模型,在这个模型中,学习者只表示一个单一的全局假设,他们在收集证据时局部更新这个假设。我们提出了一个相关的方案,来理解在这些限制下,学习者如何选择有信息量的干预措施来操纵因果系统,以帮助阐明其工作原理。我们在 3 个实验的分析中找到了对我们方法的支持。

相似文献

1
Formalizing Neurath's ship: Approximate algorithms for online causal learning.形式化 Neurath 船:在线因果学习的近似算法。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;124(3):301-338. doi: 10.1037/rev0000061. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
2
Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.赢则保留,输则抽样:一种用于近似贝叶斯推断的简单序贯算法。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Nov;74:35-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
3
Learning a theory of causality.学习因果关系理论。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):110-9. doi: 10.1037/a0021336.
4
Bottom-up learning of explicit knowledge using a Bayesian algorithm and a new Hebbian learning rule.使用贝叶斯算法和新的赫布学习规则进行显式知识的自下而上学习。
Neural Netw. 2011 Apr;24(3):219-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
5
A Bayesian Theory of Sequential Causal Learning and Abstract Transfer.顺序因果学习与抽象迁移的贝叶斯理论
Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;40(2):404-39. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12236. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
6
Extended Bayesian inference incorporating symmetry bias.纳入对称性偏差的扩展贝叶斯推理
Biosystems. 2020 Apr;190:104104. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104104. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
Inferring action structure and causal relationships in continuous sequences of human action.推断人类连续动作序列中的动作结构和因果关系。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Feb;76:30-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
8
Theory-based causal induction.基于理论的因果归纳
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):661-716. doi: 10.1037/a0017201.
9
Rational randomness: the role of sampling in an algorithmic account of preschooler's causal learning.理性随机性:抽样在幼儿因果学习算法解释中的作用。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:161-91. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00006-x.
10
Conservative forgetful scholars: How people learn causal structure through sequences of interventions.保守的健忘学者:人们如何通过一系列干预来学习因果结构。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):708-31. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000061. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the convergent validity, domain generality, and temporal stability of selected measures of people's tendency to explore.检验探索倾向的特定测量指标的聚合效度、领域普遍性和时间稳定性。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 4;15(1):7721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51685-z.
2
Explaining the flaws in human random generation as local sampling with momentum.解释人类随机生成的缺陷,即具有动量的局部采样。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jan 5;20(1):e1011739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011739. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
A model of conceptual bootstrapping in human cognition.
人类认知中的概念引导模型。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jan;8(1):125-136. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01719-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
4
The autocorrelated Bayesian sampler: A rational process for probability judgments, estimates, confidence intervals, choices, confidence judgments, and response times.自相关贝叶斯采样器:一种用于概率判断、估计、置信区间、选择、置信判断和反应时间的理性过程。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;131(2):456-493. doi: 10.1037/rev0000427. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Humans combine value learning and hypothesis testing strategically in multi-dimensional probabilistic reward learning.人类在多维概率奖励学习中策略性地结合价值学习和假设检验。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Nov 23;18(11):e1010699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010699. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
What would have happened? Counterfactuals, hypotheticals and causal judgements.将会发生什么?反事实、假设和因果判断。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 19;377(1866):20210339. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0339. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
7
Curriculum learning for human compositional generalization.人类组合泛化的课程学习。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 11;119(41):e2205582119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205582119. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
8
The Paradox of Time in Dynamic Causal Systems.动态因果系统中的时间悖论。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;24(7):863. doi: 10.3390/e24070863.
9
How Do People Generalize Causal Relations over Objects? A Non-parametric Bayesian Account.人们如何对物体间的因果关系进行归纳?一种非参数贝叶斯解释。
Comput Brain Behav. 2022;5(1):22-44. doi: 10.1007/s42113-021-00124-z. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
BARD: A Structured Technique for Group Elicitation of Bayesian Networks to Support Analytic Reasoning.BARD:一种用于支持分析推理的贝叶斯网络的结构化群组启发式技术。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jun;42(6):1155-1178. doi: 10.1111/risa.13759. Epub 2021 Jun 19.