• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BARD:一种用于支持分析推理的贝叶斯网络的结构化群组启发式技术。

BARD: A Structured Technique for Group Elicitation of Bayesian Networks to Support Analytic Reasoning.

机构信息

Department of Data Science & AI, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Bayesian Intelligence Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2022 Jun;42(6):1155-1178. doi: 10.1111/risa.13759. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13759
PMID:34146433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9290058/
Abstract

In many complex, real-world situations, problem solving and decision making require effective reasoning about causation and uncertainty. However, human reasoning in these cases is prone to confusion and error. Bayesian networks (BNs) are an artificial intelligence technology that models uncertain situations, supporting better probabilistic and causal reasoning and decision making. However, to date, BN methodologies and software require (but do not include) substantial upfront training, do not provide much guidance on either the model building process or on using the model for reasoning and reporting, and provide no support for building BNs collaboratively. Here, we contribute a detailed description and motivation for our new methodology and application, Bayesian ARgumentation via Delphi (BARD). BARD utilizes BNs and addresses these shortcomings by integrating (1) short, high-quality e-courses, tips, and help on demand; (2) a stepwise, iterative, and incremental BN construction process; (3) report templates and an automated explanation tool; and (4) a multiuser web-based software platform and Delphi-style social processes. The result is an end-to-end online platform, with associated online training, for groups without prior BN expertise to understand and analyze a problem, build a model of its underlying probabilistic causal structure, validate and reason with the causal model, and (optionally) use it to produce a written analytic report. Initial experiments demonstrate that, for suitable problems, BARD aids in reasoning and reporting. Comparing their effect sizes also suggests BARD's BN-building and collaboration combine beneficially and cumulatively.

摘要

在许多复杂的现实情况下,解决问题和决策需要有效地推理因果关系和不确定性。然而,人类在这些情况下的推理容易混淆和出错。贝叶斯网络(BNs)是一种人工智能技术,用于建模不确定情况,支持更好的概率和因果推理和决策。然而,迄今为止,BN 方法和软件需要(但不包括)大量的前期培训,对模型构建过程或使用模型进行推理和报告都没有提供太多指导,也不支持协作构建 BNs。在这里,我们详细描述并介绍了我们的新方法和应用程序,即通过 Delphi 进行贝叶斯论证(BARD)。BARD 利用 BNs 并通过以下方式解决这些缺点:(1)整合短而高质量的电子课程、提示和按需帮助;(2)逐步、迭代和增量 BN 构建过程;(3)报告模板和自动解释工具;(4)多用户基于网络的软件平台和 Delphi 式的社交流程。最终结果是一个端到端的在线平台,以及相关的在线培训,为没有 BN 专业知识的团队提供了一个理解和分析问题、构建潜在概率因果结构模型、验证和推理因果模型以及(可选)使用该模型生成书面分析报告的工具。初步实验表明,对于合适的问题,BARD 有助于推理和报告。比较它们的效应大小还表明,BARD 的 BN 构建和协作是有益的和累积的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/4b429160d19a/RISA-42-1155-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/fc6a63b79286/RISA-42-1155-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/1180e3ff5b5a/RISA-42-1155-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/4d10abf18a00/RISA-42-1155-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/7a01e67428f3/RISA-42-1155-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/597d758e6705/RISA-42-1155-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/4b429160d19a/RISA-42-1155-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/fc6a63b79286/RISA-42-1155-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/1180e3ff5b5a/RISA-42-1155-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/4d10abf18a00/RISA-42-1155-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/7a01e67428f3/RISA-42-1155-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/597d758e6705/RISA-42-1155-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c5/9290058/4b429160d19a/RISA-42-1155-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
BARD: A Structured Technique for Group Elicitation of Bayesian Networks to Support Analytic Reasoning.BARD:一种用于支持分析推理的贝叶斯网络的结构化群组启发式技术。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jun;42(6):1155-1178. doi: 10.1111/risa.13759. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
2
Individuals vs. BARD: Experimental Evaluation of an Online System for Structured, Collaborative Bayesian Reasoning.个体与BARD:结构化协作贝叶斯推理在线系统的实验评估
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 18;11:1054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01054. eCollection 2020.
3
Explanation of Bayesian networks and influence diagrams in Elvira.Elvira中贝叶斯网络和影响图的解释。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2007 Aug;37(4):952-65. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2007.896018.
4
Developing Bayesian networks from a dependency-layered ontology: A proof-of-concept in radiation oncology.从依赖分层本体中开发贝叶斯网络:放射肿瘤学中的概念验证。
Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4350-4359. doi: 10.1002/mp.12340. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
5
A general structure for legal arguments about evidence using Bayesian networks.使用贝叶斯网络的证据法律论证的一般结构。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):61-102. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12004. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
6
Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.《贝叶斯理性:人类推理的概率方法》概要
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Feb;32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000284.
7
Tutorial of the probabilistic methods Bayesian networks and influence diagrams applied to medicine.医学中概率方法贝叶斯网络和影响图的教程。
J Evid Based Med. 2018 May;11(2):112-124. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12298.
8
Medical idioms for clinical Bayesian network development.用于临床贝叶斯网络开发的医学成语。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Aug;108:103495. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103495. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
9
Building Bayesian Networks from Causal Rules.从因果规则构建贝叶斯网络。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:740-744.
10
Modeling COVID-19 disease processes by remote elicitation of causal Bayesian networks from medical experts.通过远程从医学专家中获取因果贝叶斯网络来对 COVID-19 疾病过程进行建模。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01856-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting Standards for Bayesian Network Modelling.贝叶斯网络建模的报告标准。
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Jan 15;27(1):69. doi: 10.3390/e27010069.
2
Application of Electroencephalography Sensors and Artificial Intelligence in Automated Language Teaching.脑电图传感器和人工智能在自动化语言教学中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;24(21):6969. doi: 10.3390/s24216969.
3
Physical education teaching mode assisted by artificial intelligence assistant under the guidance of high-order complex network.高阶复杂网络指导下的人工智能辅助体育教学模式

本文引用的文献

1
Individuals vs. BARD: Experimental Evaluation of an Online System for Structured, Collaborative Bayesian Reasoning.个体与BARD:结构化协作贝叶斯推理在线系统的实验评估
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 18;11:1054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01054. eCollection 2020.
2
Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving.扩大贝叶斯问题解决方法的应用范围。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 9;11:660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660. eCollection 2020.
3
Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than numbers.口头概率:比数字更有可能让人感到有些困惑。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53964-7.
4
Construction of predictive model for osteoporosis related factors among postmenopausal women on the basis of logistic regression and Bayesian network.基于逻辑回归和贝叶斯网络构建绝经后女性骨质疏松相关因素的预测模型。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 22;35:102378. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102378. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Modeling COVID-19 disease processes by remote elicitation of causal Bayesian networks from medical experts.通过远程从医学专家中获取因果贝叶斯网络来对 COVID-19 疾病过程进行建模。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01856-1.
6
Individuals vs. BARD: Experimental Evaluation of an Online System for Structured, Collaborative Bayesian Reasoning.个体与BARD:结构化协作贝叶斯推理在线系统的实验评估
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 18;11:1054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01054. eCollection 2020.
7
Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving.扩大贝叶斯问题解决方法的应用范围。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 9;11:660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660. eCollection 2020.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0213522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213522. eCollection 2019.
4
The Zero-Sum Fallacy in Evidence Evaluation.证据评估中的零和谬误。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;30(2):250-260. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818484. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
5
Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.个体决策与群体决策:陪审员在评估专家证词时对核心信息和边缘信息的依赖
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0183580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183580. eCollection 2017.
6
Formalizing Neurath's ship: Approximate algorithms for online causal learning.形式化 Neurath 船:在线因果学习的近似算法。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;124(3):301-338. doi: 10.1037/rev0000061. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups.群体比个体更理性吗?对群体互动决策的综述。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;3(4):471-482. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1184. Epub 2012 May 11.
8
The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?贝叶斯方法的兴起:是好是坏?
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 8;5:765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00765. eCollection 2014.
9
Causality in thought.思维中的因果关系。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:223-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015135. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
10
Bayesian networks for clinical decision support in lung cancer care.贝叶斯网络在肺癌护理中的临床决策支持。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 6;8(12):e82349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082349. eCollection 2013.