Evans Elizabeth A, Grella Christine E, Upchurch Dawn M
Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), 11075 Santa Monica Blvd., 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA.
Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, 36-071 CHS, 951772, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;52(7):901-912. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1355-3. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
To examine gender differences in the associations between childhood adversity and different types of substance use disorders and whether gender moderates these relationships.
We analyzed data from 19,209 women and 13,898 men as provided by Wave 2 (2004-2005) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) to examine whether gender moderates the associations between childhood adversity and DSM-IV defined lifetime occurrence of alcohol, drug, and polysubstance-related disorders. We used multinomial logistic regression, weighted to be representative of the US adult civilian, noninstitutionalized population, and we calculated predicted probabilities by gender, controlling for covariates. To test which specific moderation contrasts were statistically significant, we conducted pair-wise comparisons corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni's method.
For each type of substance use disorder, risk was increased by more exposure to childhood adversity, and women had a lower risk than men. However, moderation effects revealed that with more experiences of childhood adversity, the gender gap in predicted probability for a disorder narrowed in relation to alcohol, it converged in relation to drugs such that risk among women surpassed that among men, and it widened in relation to polysubstances.
Knowledge regarding substance-specific gender differences associated with childhood adversity exposure can inform evidence-based treatments. It may also be useful for shaping other types of gender-sensitive public health initiatives to ameliorate or prevent different types of substance use disorders.
研究童年逆境与不同类型物质使用障碍之间关联的性别差异,以及性别是否调节这些关系。
我们分析了由全国酒精及相关状况流行病学调查(NESARC)第二轮(2004 - 2005年)提供的19209名女性和13898名男性的数据,以检验性别是否调节童年逆境与DSM - IV定义的终生酒精、药物和多物质相关障碍发生之间的关联。我们使用多项逻辑回归,加权后代表美国成年平民、非机构化人口,并按性别计算预测概率,同时控制协变量。为了检验哪些特定的调节对比具有统计学意义,我们使用邦费罗尼方法进行了经多重比较校正的成对比较。
对于每种类型的物质使用障碍,童年逆境暴露越多,风险越高,且女性风险低于男性。然而,调节效应显示,随着童年逆境经历增多,酒精相关障碍预测概率的性别差距缩小,药物相关障碍的性别差距趋同,以至于女性风险超过男性,而多物质相关障碍的性别差距扩大。
关于与童年逆境暴露相关的特定物质性别差异的知识可为循证治疗提供依据。它也可能有助于制定其他类型的性别敏感公共卫生举措,以改善或预防不同类型的物质使用障碍。