Głąbska Dominika, Guzek Dominika, Ślązak Joanna, Włodarek Dariusz
Department of Dietetics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 159c Nowoursynowska Str., 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Organization and Consumption Economics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 159c Nowoursynowska Str., 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Nutrients. 2017 Feb 27;9(3):199. doi: 10.3390/nu9030199.
The aim of the study was to analyse a designed brief iron dietary intake questionnaire based on a food frequency assessment (IRONIC-FFQ-IRON Intake Calculation-Food Frequency Questionnaire), including the assessment of validity and reproducibility in a group of 75 Polish women aged 20-30 years. Participants conducted 3-day dietary records and filled in the IRONIC-FFQ twice (FFQ1-directly after the dietary record and FFQ2-6 weeks later). The analysis included an assessment of validity (comparison with the results of the 3-day dietary record) and of reproducibility (comparison of the results obtained twice-FFQ1 and FFQ2). In the analysis of validity, the share of individuals correctly classified into tertiles was over 50% (weighted of 0.36), while analysis of correlation revealed correlation coefficients of almost 0.5. In the assessment of reproducibility, almost 80% of individuals were correctly classified and less than 3% were misclassified (weighted of 0.73), while a correlation coefficient higher than 0.85 was obtained. Both in the assessment of validity and of reproducibility, a Bland-Altman index of 6.7% was recorded (93.3% of compared pairs of results were in the acceptable range, attributed to differences within ± 2SD limit). Validation of the IRONIC-FFQ revealed a satisfactory level of validity and positively validated reproducibility.
本研究的目的是分析一份基于食物频率评估设计的简短铁膳食摄入量问卷(IRONIC-FFQ——铁摄入量计算-食物频率问卷),包括对75名年龄在20至30岁的波兰女性群体的有效性和可重复性评估。参与者进行了为期3天的饮食记录,并两次填写IRONIC-FFQ(FFQ1——饮食记录后立即填写,FFQ2——6周后填写)。分析包括有效性评估(与3天饮食记录结果进行比较)和可重复性评估(比较两次获得的结果——FFQ1和FFQ2)。在有效性分析中,正确分类到三分位数的个体比例超过50%(加权κ值为0.36),而相关性分析显示相关系数接近0.5。在可重复性评估中,近80%的个体被正确分类,不到3%的个体被错误分类(加权κ值为0.73),同时获得的相关系数高于0.85。在有效性评估和可重复性评估中,Bland-Altman指数均记录为6.7%(93.3%的比较结果对在可接受范围内,归因于±2SD限值内的差异)。IRONIC-FFQ的验证显示出令人满意的有效性水平和得到肯定验证的可重复性。