Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激对中风患者的安全性和耐受性——一项I期电流递增研究。

Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study.

作者信息

Chhatbar Pratik Y, Chen Rong, Deardorff Rachael, Dellenbach Blair, Kautz Steven A, George Mark S, Feng Wuwei

机构信息

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Center for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2017 May-Jun;10(3):553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A prior meta-analysis revealed that higher doses of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have a better post-stroke upper-extremity motor recovery. While this finding suggests that currents greater than the typically used 2 mA may be more efficacious, the safety and tolerability of higher currents have not been assessed in stroke patients. We aim to assess the safety and tolerability of single session of up to 4 mA in stroke patients.

METHODS

We adapted a traditional 3 + 3 study design with a current escalation schedule of 1»2»2.5»3»3.5»4 mA for this tDCS safety study. We administered one 30-min session of bihemispheric montage tDCS and simultaneous customary occupational therapy to patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. We assessed safety with pre-defined stopping rules and investigated tolerability through a questionnaire. Additionally, we monitored body resistance and skin temperature in real-time at the electrode contact site.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients completed the study. The current was escalated to 4 mA without meeting the pre-defined stopping rules or causing any major safety concern. 50% of patients experienced transient skin redness without injury. No rise in temperature (range 26°C-35 °C) was noted and skin barrier function remained intact (i.e. body resistance >1 kΩ).

CONCLUSION

Our phase I safety study supports that single session of bihemispheric tDCS with current up to 4 mA is safe and tolerable in stroke patients. A phase II study to further test the safety and preliminary efficacy with multi-session tDCS at 4 mA (as compared with lower current and sham stimulation) is a logical next step. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02763826.

摘要

背景与目的

先前的一项荟萃分析显示,较高剂量的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对中风后上肢运动功能恢复效果更佳。虽然这一发现表明,大于常用的2毫安电流可能更有效,但尚未对中风患者中较高电流的安全性和耐受性进行评估。我们旨在评估中风患者单次接受高达4毫安电流的安全性和耐受性。

方法

我们采用传统的3+3研究设计,在本次tDCS安全性研究中,电流递增方案为1»2»2.5»3»3.5»4毫安。我们对首次发生缺血性中风的患者进行了一次30分钟的双侧半球组合tDCS治疗,并同时进行常规职业治疗。我们根据预先定义的停止规则评估安全性,并通过问卷调查来研究耐受性。此外,我们实时监测电极接触部位的身体电阻和皮肤温度。

结果

18名患者完成了研究。电流递增至4毫安,未达到预先定义的停止规则,也未引起任何重大安全问题。50%的患者出现短暂性皮肤发红但未受伤。未观察到温度升高(范围为26°C至35°C),皮肤屏障功能保持完好(即身体电阻>1千欧)。

结论

我们的I期安全性研究表明,中风患者单次接受高达4毫安电流的双侧半球tDCS是安全且耐受性良好的。下一步合理的做法是开展II期研究,以进一步测试4毫安多疗程tDCS的安全性和初步疗效(与较低电流和假刺激相比)。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02763826。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.经颅直流电刺激的安全性:2016年循证更新
Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
3
Phase 1 trial design: is 3 + 3 the best?1期试验设计:3+3方案是最佳方案吗?
Cancer Control. 2014 Jul;21(3):200-8. doi: 10.1177/107327481402100304.
5
Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization.特定年龄的 CT 和 MRI 模板用于空间标准化。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):957-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.020. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验