• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在骨盆训练器模型中,与传统腹腔镜器械相比,Kymerax©精密驱动关节手术系统的性能。

Performance of Kymerax© precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model.

机构信息

University of Bern, Spital Interlaken, Unterseen, Switzerland.

, Stockhornweg 15, 3422, Kirchberg, Switzerland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4298-4308. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5438-8. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5438-8
PMID:28281112
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Kymerax© Precision-Drive Articulating Surgical System by Terumo© is a handheld laparoscopic robot which permits motion in two additional degrees of freedom (deflection and rotation in the instrument tip). In a pelvitrainer model, we compared the performance of participants with different laparoscopic experiences and compared Kymerax© to conventional laparoscopic instruments.

METHODS

20 expert surgeons, performing more than 50 laparoscopic procedures per year, and 25 medical students without any experience in surgery at all were selected. Each participant was randomized into two groups: Group TK performed the tasks using the traditional laparoscopic Instruments (TLI) first and Kymerax© thereafter, group KT vice versa. Six standardized tasks were used: Two instructional exercises and four tasks where time, number of mistakes, and overall precision were measured. Finally, a questionnaire had to be answered.

RESULTS

All four tasks were performed significantly more slowly with the Kymerax© device. Improved needle control in stitches towards the surgeon, significantly less deviation while cutting along different lines as well as a significantly reduced fraying of the cutting edge were found when participants were using Kymerax©. By questionnaire more than 90% of the participants indicated clear advantages using Kymerax©. However, participants needed more training time and had an earlier loss of concentration with Kymerax©. Further complaints about Kymerax© were its limitations in rotation and deflection, the impaired view as well as the non-ergonomic instrument handle. Rotation force, instrument weight, digital instrument-tip control, and needle fixation were rated as accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that more time is needed to solve tasks with Kymerax© compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments. Kymerax© is superior to conventional laparoscopy for suturing at difficult angles and cutting along complex structures. Kymerax© can potentially bring benefits for certain laparoscopic tasks, but as seen in this study, further developments are necessary. Terumo© meanwhile closed down its Kymerax

摘要

背景

特鲁姆(Terumo)的 Kymerax© 精密驱动关节手术系统是一种手持腹腔镜机器人,它允许在两个附加自由度上运动(器械尖端的偏转和旋转)。在骨盆训练器模型中,我们比较了具有不同腹腔镜经验的参与者的表现,并将 Kymerax© 与传统腹腔镜器械进行了比较。

方法

选择了 20 名经验丰富的外科医生,每年进行超过 50 例腹腔镜手术,以及 25 名完全没有手术经验的医学生。每位参与者都被随机分为两组:TK 组先使用传统腹腔镜器械(TLI)完成任务,然后使用 Kymerax©;KT 组反之。使用了六个标准化任务:两个指导练习和四个任务,测量时间、错误次数和整体精度。最后,参与者还需要回答一份问卷。

结果

所有四项任务使用 Kymerax© 设备时都明显变慢。当参与者使用 Kymerax© 时,发现缝合时对向外科医生的针控制得到改善,沿不同线切割时的偏差明显减少,以及切割边缘的磨损明显减少。通过问卷,超过 90%的参与者表示使用 Kymerax© 有明显优势。然而,参与者使用 Kymerax© 时需要更多的培训时间,并且较早地失去了注意力。进一步对 Kymerax© 的投诉包括其在旋转和偏转方面的限制、视觉受损以及非人体工程学的器械手柄。旋转力、器械重量、数字器械尖端控制和针固定被评为准确。

结论

这项研究表明,与传统腹腔镜器械相比,使用 Kymerax© 解决任务需要更多的时间。Kymerax© 在缝合困难角度和沿复杂结构切割方面优于传统腹腔镜。Kymerax© 可能会为某些腹腔镜任务带来好处,但正如本研究所见,还需要进一步的发展。特鲁姆(Terumo)随后关闭了 Kymerax©

相似文献

1
Performance of Kymerax© precision-drive articulating surgical system compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments in a pelvitrainer model.在骨盆训练器模型中,与传统腹腔镜器械相比,Kymerax©精密驱动关节手术系统的性能。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4298-4308. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5438-8. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.使用具有人体工程学手柄的机器人驱动腹腔镜持针器的初步经验:评估外科医生的任务绩效和人体工程学。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Dec;12(12):2069-2077. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1636-z. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.初学者与专家在腹腔镜手术中二维与三维的比较:一项关于在客观分级手术步骤的盆腔训练器上进行的随机对照试验
J Surg Educ. 2017 Sep-Oct;74(5):867-877. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
4
Assessment of Postural Ergonomics and Surgical Performance in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Using a Handheld Robotic Device.使用手持机器人设备评估腹腔镜单孔手术中的姿势人体工程学和手术操作表现。
Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):208-217. doi: 10.1177/1553350618759768. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Evaluation and comparison of basic gestures in ex vivo laparoscopic surgery using a robotic instrument and traditional laparoscopic instruments.使用机器人器械和传统腹腔镜器械在离体腹腔镜手术中对基本手势的评估与比较。
Prog Urol. 2020 Jan;30(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
6
Learning Intracorporeal Suture on Pelvitrainer Using a Robotized Versus Conventional Needle Holder.在骨盆训练器上使用机器人化 versus 传统持针器学习腔内缝合。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jul;251:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments.灵活性与机动性的权衡:使用铰接式腹腔镜器械的任务表现。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2697-701. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0462-y. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
8
Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills Performance: 2D Versus 3D Vision and Classic Instrument Versus New Hand-Held Robotic Device for Laparoscopy.腹腔镜手术技能表现评估:二维与三维视觉以及传统器械与新型手持式腹腔镜机器人设备的比较
Surg Innov. 2016 Feb;23(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/1553350615585638. Epub 2015 May 20.
9
Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices.新手在单孔手术模拟器中使用的腹腔镜手持器械的人体工程学比较
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Apr;24(2):68-76. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.946426. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
10
Is the Human Brain Capable of Controlling Seven Degrees of Freedom?人类大脑是否能够控制七个自由度?
J Surg Res. 2019 Jun;238:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance and operative outcomes' evaluation of a hand-held articulating laparoscopic device: a prospective clinical trial on the HandX™ platform.手持式关节腹腔镜设备的性能与手术结果评估:关于HandX™平台的一项前瞻性临床试验
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 18;19(1):401. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02539-3.
2
Evaluation of the suitability of using ArtiSential in various renal surgery: IDEAL stage 1 study.评估 ArtiSential 在各种肾脏手术中的适用性:IDEAL 阶段 1 研究。
BMC Urol. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01539-z.
3
Laparoscopy training of novices with complex curved instruments using 2D- and 3D-visualization.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct manipulation of tool-like masters for controlling a master-slave surgical robotic system.用于控制主从式手术机器人系统的类工具主设备的直接操作。
Int J Med Robot. 2014 Dec;10(4):427-37. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1545. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
2
The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer.机器人技术在直肠癌微创手术中的作用。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2013 Sep 26;7:357. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2013.357.
3
Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy outcomes in obese and extremely obese men.腹腔镜和机器人根治性前列腺切除术在肥胖和极度肥胖男性中的疗效。
使用 2D 和 3D 可视化技术对新手进行复杂弯曲器械腹腔镜培训。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 3;409(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03297-w.
4
Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Novel 7-Degrees of Freedom Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgeries.一种新型腹腔镜手术七自由度器械的设计、分析与实验验证
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Apr;51(4):751-770. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03086-w. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
5
Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌标准及高级筛查、分期系统与治疗方式综述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 13;14(12):2913. doi: 10.3390/cancers14122913.
6
Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.内镜手术缝合技术:一项学习的随机研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2.
7
Assessment of an Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder (FlexDex™) Compared to a Conventional Rigid Needle Holder in 2-Dimension Vision Amongst Novices: A Randomised Controlled Study.新手二维视野下关节式腹腔镜持针器(FlexDex™)与传统刚性持针器的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Feb 4;15:15-25. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S345140. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.使用骨盆训练模型比较 2D 4K 与 3D HD 腹腔镜成像系统:一项随机对照研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1137-1147. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01195-0. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
9
Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery.小儿微创手术的进展与趋势
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 10;9(12):3999. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123999.
10
Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum.腹腔镜新手使用标准化腹腔镜技能课程评估新型电动关节腹腔镜器械。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):979-988. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
4
Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery.妇科手术中腹部切口美容效果的患者偏好。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.
5
[Current status and future perspectives of robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer].[胃癌机器人手术和腹腔镜手术的现状与未来展望]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;15(8):776-7.
6
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术治疗老年早期宫颈癌的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;207(3):195.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.081. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
7
Safety of laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹手术在子宫内膜癌分期中的安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
8
[Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery and its importance in surgical training].[腹腔镜手术中的人体工程学及其在外科培训中的重要性]
Cir Esp. 2012 May;90(5):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2011.04.021. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
9
Laparoscopic intracorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model.在模拟模型中使用Radius手术系统进行腹腔镜体内大肠缝合吻合术。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1624-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9992-y. Epub 2008 Jun 14.
10
Radius surgical system and conventional laparoscopic instruments in abdominal surgery: application, learning curve and ergonomy.腹部手术中的桡骨手术系统与传统腹腔镜器械:应用、学习曲线与人体工程学
Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:S69-72. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.028. Epub 2007 Nov 26.