Suppr超能文献

异常点和体型导致肝移植中的性别差异。

Exception Points and Body Size Contribute to Gender Disparity in Liver Transplantation.

作者信息

Nephew Lauren D, Goldberg David S, Lewis James D, Abt Peter, Bryan Mathew, Forde Kimberly A

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;15(8):1286-1293.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Women are significantly less likely than men to receive a liver transplant and more likely to die on the waitlist. We investigated potential reasons for these disparities, including match run positioning and organ declines caused by small stature of female recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the United Network of Organ Sharing registry of candidates placed on the waitlist from May 10, 2007, through June 17, 2013. Primary outcomes included ranked in first position on a match run, having an organ declined while in first position, declining an organ while in first position because of size mismatch between donor and recipient (body surface area discordance), and death or becoming too sick for liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Among 64,995 patients on the waitlist for liver transplantation, 23.1% of men and 15.6% of women received exception points (P < .001). Women listed without exception points were less likely than men to be ranked first (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99). Women who achieved first position were more likely to decline an organ than men (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26); this difference was reduced after we accounted for recipient body surface area (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.98-1.19). Women with a single organ decline were more likely than men with a single organ decline to die or become too sick for transplantation (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.41). The difference was reduced after we accounted for exception points (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12-1.21) and recipient body surface area (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of data from the United Network of Organ Sharing registry, we found that women when compared with men on the waitlist for liver transplantation are disadvantaged by an imbalance in exception point allocation and organ declines because of small stature.

摘要

背景与目的

女性接受肝移植的可能性显著低于男性,且在等待名单上死亡的可能性更高。我们调查了造成这些差异的潜在原因,包括配型轮次排名以及女性受者身材矮小导致的器官拒绝。

方法

我们分析了器官共享联合网络登记处2007年5月10日至2013年6月17日期间等待名单上候选人的数据。主要结局包括在配型轮次中排名第一、在排名第一时器官被拒绝、因供受者之间大小不匹配(体表面积不一致)在排名第一时拒绝器官,以及死亡或病情过重无法进行肝移植。

结果

在64995名等待肝移植的患者中,23.1%的男性和15.6%的女性获得了例外积分(P <.001)。未获得例外积分的女性比男性排名第一的可能性更小(优势比[OR],0.93;95%置信区间,0.88 - 0.99)。排名第一的女性比男性更有可能拒绝器官(OR,1.15;95%置信区间,1.06 - 1.26);在考虑受者体表面积后,这种差异有所减小(OR,1.08;95%置信区间,0.98 - 1.19)。单一器官被拒绝的女性比单一器官被拒绝的男性更有可能死亡或病情过重无法进行移植(OR,1.26;95%置信区间,1.12 - 1.41)。在考虑例外积分(OR,1.16;95%置信区间,1.12 - 1.21)和受者体表面积(OR,1.01;95%置信区间,0.96 - 1.06)后,这种差异有所减小。

结论

在对器官共享联合网络登记处数据的分析中,我们发现与等待肝移植名单上的男性相比,女性因例外积分分配不平衡和身材矮小导致的器官拒绝而处于不利地位。

相似文献

1
Exception Points and Body Size Contribute to Gender Disparity in Liver Transplantation.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;15(8):1286-1293.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
2
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2371-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.720.
3
Receipt of a pediatric liver offer as the first offer reduces waitlist mortality for adult women.
Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68(3):1101-1110. doi: 10.1002/hep.29906. Epub 2018 May 20.
4
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Sex-based disparities in delisting for being "too sick" for liver transplantation.
Am J Transplant. 2018 May;18(5):1214-1219. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14608. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Impact of the acuity circle model for liver allocation on multivisceral transplant candidates.
Am J Transplant. 2022 Feb;22(2):464-473. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16803. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
9
Nonstandard Exception Requests Impact Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.
Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3181-3191. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13879. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
10
Persistent sex disparity in liver transplantation rates.
Surgery. 2021 Mar;169(3):694-699. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.028. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

3
A Comprehensive Assessment of Liver Transplant Trends and Outcomes Among Adults With Steatotic Liver Disease in the U.S.
Gastro Hep Adv. 2024 Dec 27;4(4):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100609. eCollection 2025.
4
Systematic Sex-Based Inequity in the MELD Score-Based Allocation System for Liver Transplantation in Germany.
Transpl Int. 2025 Jan 29;38:13844. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.13844. eCollection 2025.
6
Patient sex and use of tranexamic acid in liver transplantation.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 23;11:1452733. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1452733. eCollection 2024.
7
Sex and Size Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3498.
8
Validation of MELD3.0 in 2 centers from different continents.
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Jul 31;8(8). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000504. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
10
Evaluating the Correlation Between Anteroposterior Diameter, Body Surface Area, and Height for Liver Transplant Donors and Recipients.
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 16;10(6):e1630. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001630. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Liver transplant center variability in accepting organ offers and its impact on patient survival.
J Hepatol. 2016 Apr;64(4):843-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
2
MELDEQ : An alternative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Liver Transpl. 2015 May;21(5):612-22. doi: 10.1002/lt.24098. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
4
Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;47 Suppl(0):S2-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182872f29.
5
Impact of estimated liver volume and liver weight on gender disparity in liver transplantation.
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jan;19(1):89-95. doi: 10.1002/lt.23553. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
6
An examination of liver offers to candidates on the liver transplant wait-list.
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1261-1265. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.105. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
7
Sex-based disparities in liver transplant rates in the United States.
Am J Transplant. 2011 Jul;11(7):1435-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03498.x.
8
Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system.
Am J Transplant. 2010 Dec;10(12):2658-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
10
Twelve-year follow-up of American women's awareness of cardiovascular disease risk and barriers to heart health.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):120-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.915538. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验