Suppr超能文献

电子设备评估吸入器技术的研究综述。

A Review of Electronic Devices to Assess Inhaler Technique.

机构信息

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, CPO 2125, Asheville, NC, 28804, USA.

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Mar;17(3):17. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0684-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple electronic devices exist that provide feedback on the accuracy of patient inhaler technique. Our purpose is to describe the inhaler technique feedback provided by these devices, including specific technique steps measured, how feedback is displayed, target of feedback (patient, provider, researcher), and compatibility with inhaler type (metered-dose inhaler [MDI], diskus, etc.).

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified eight devices that provide feedback on inhaler technique. Only one device assessed all evidence-based MDI technique steps. Most devices provide limited real-time feedback to patients, if any feedback at all. Technologies to assess inhaler technique are advancing and hold great potential for improving patient inhaler technique. Many devices are limited in their ability to detect all evidence-based technique steps and provide real-time user-friendly feedback to patients and providers. Usability tests with patients and providers could identify ways to improve these devices to improve their utility in clinical settings.

摘要

目的综述

有多种电子设备可提供患者吸入器技术准确性的反馈。我们的目的是描述这些设备提供的吸入器技术反馈,包括测量的具体技术步骤、反馈的显示方式、反馈的对象(患者、提供者、研究人员)以及与吸入器类型(计量吸入器 [MDI]、碟式等)的兼容性。

最近的发现

我们确定了 8 种提供吸入器技术反馈的设备。只有一种设备评估了所有基于证据的 MDI 技术步骤。大多数设备仅向患者提供有限的实时反馈,如果有的话。评估吸入器技术的技术正在进步,并具有改善患者吸入器技术的巨大潜力。许多设备在检测所有基于证据的技术步骤并为患者和提供者提供实时用户友好的反馈方面能力有限。对患者和提供者进行可用性测试可以确定改进这些设备的方法,以提高它们在临床环境中的实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验