Constantinescu-Sharpe Gabriella, Phillips Rebecca L, Davis Aleisha, Dornan Dimity, Hogan Anthony
School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
.
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0823-y.
Social inclusion is a common focus of listening and spoken language (LSL) early intervention for children with hearing loss. This exploratory study compared the social inclusion of young children with hearing loss educated using a listening and spoken language approach with population data.
A framework for understanding the scope of social inclusion is presented in the Background. This framework guided the use of a shortened, modified version of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) to measure two of the five facets of social inclusion ('education' and 'interacting with society and fulfilling social goals'). The survey was completed by parents of children with hearing loss aged 4-5 years who were educated using a LSL approach (n = 78; 37% who responded). These responses were compared to those obtained for typical hearing children in the LSAC dataset (n = 3265).
Analyses revealed that most children with hearing loss had comparable outcomes to those with typical hearing on the 'education' and 'interacting with society and fulfilling social roles' facets of social inclusion.
These exploratory findings are positive and warrant further investigation across all five facets of the framework to identify which factors influence social inclusion.
社会融入是听力损失儿童听力与口语(LSL)早期干预的一个共同关注点。这项探索性研究将采用听力与口语方法接受教育的听力损失幼儿的社会融入情况与总体数据进行了比较。
背景部分介绍了一个理解社会融入范围的框架。该框架指导使用澳大利亚儿童纵向研究(LSAC)的一个缩短的、经过修改的版本,来衡量社会融入五个方面中的两个方面(“教育”以及“与社会互动并实现社会目标”)。调查由采用LSL方法接受教育的4至5岁听力损失儿童的家长完成(n = 78;回复率为37%)。将这些回复与LSAC数据集中典型听力儿童的回复(n = 3265)进行了比较。
分析显示,在社会融入的“教育”和“与社会互动并履行社会角色”方面,大多数听力损失儿童的结果与典型听力儿童相当。
这些探索性结果是积极的,有必要对该框架的所有五个方面进行进一步调查,以确定哪些因素影响社会融入。