Howle Laurens E, Weber Paul W, Hada Ethan A, Vann Richard D, Denoble Petar J
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Hudson Hall, Research Drive, Duke University, Durham, NC United States of America.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0172665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172665. eCollection 2017.
Decompression sickness (DCS), which is caused by inert gas bubbles in tissues, is an injury of concern for scuba divers, compressed air workers, astronauts, and aviators. Case reports for 3322 air and N2-O2 dives, resulting in 190 DCS events, were retrospectively analyzed and the outcomes were scored as (1) serious neurological, (2) cardiopulmonary, (3) mild neurological, (4) pain, (5) lymphatic or skin, and (6) constitutional or nonspecific manifestations. Following standard U.S. Navy medical definitions, the data were grouped into mild-Type I (manifestations 4-6)-and serious-Type II (manifestations 1-3). Additionally, we considered an alternative grouping of mild-Type A (manifestations 3-6)-and serious-Type B (manifestations 1 and 2). The current U.S. Navy guidance allows for a 2% probability of mild DCS and a 0.1% probability of serious DCS. We developed a hierarchical trinomial (3-state) probabilistic DCS model that simultaneously predicts the probability of mild and serious DCS given a dive exposure. Both the Type I/II and Type A/B discriminations of mild and serious DCS resulted in a highly significant (p << 0.01) improvement in trinomial model fit over the binomial (2-state) model. With the Type I/II definition, we found that the predicted probability of 'mild' DCS resulted in a longer allowable bottom time for the same 2% limit. However, for the 0.1% serious DCS limit, we found a vastly decreased allowable bottom dive time for all dive depths. If the Type A/B scoring was assigned to outcome severity, the no decompression limits (NDL) for air dives were still controlled by the acceptable serious DCS risk limit rather than the acceptable mild DCS risk limit. However, in this case, longer NDL limits were allowed than with the Type I/II scoring. The trinomial model mild and serious probabilities agree reasonably well with the current air NDL only with the Type A/B scoring and when 0.2% risk of serious DCS is allowed.
减压病(DCS)是由组织中的惰性气体气泡引起的,是水肺潜水员、压缩空气作业人员、宇航员和飞行员所关注的一种损伤。对3322次空气和N2 - O2潜水的病例报告进行了回顾性分析,这些潜水导致了190起减压病事件,并将结果分为(1)严重神经型,(2)心肺型,(3)轻度神经型,(4)疼痛型,(5)淋巴或皮肤型,以及(6)全身或非特异性表现型。按照美国海军的标准医学定义,数据被分为轻度I型(表现为4 - 6型)和严重II型(表现为1 - 3型)。此外,我们还考虑了另一种分组方式,即轻度A型(表现为3 - 6型)和严重B型(表现为1和2型)。美国海军目前的指导方针允许轻度减压病的发生率为2%,严重减压病的发生率为0.1%。我们开发了一种分层三项式(三状态)概率性减压病模型,该模型能在给定潜水暴露量的情况下同时预测轻度和严重减压病的概率。轻度和严重减压病的I/II型和A/B型区分,相较于二项式(双状态)模型,三项式模型的拟合度都有极显著的提高(p << 0.01)。采用I/II型定义时,我们发现对于相同的2%发生率限制,预测的“轻度”减压病概率会导致更长的允许水底停留时间。然而,对于0.1%的严重减压病发生率限制,我们发现所有潜水深度的允许水底潜水时间都大幅减少。如果将A/B型评分用于结果严重程度,空气潜水的无减压极限(NDL)仍由可接受的严重减压病风险极限控制,而非可接受的轻度减压病风险极限。然而,在这种情况下,允许的NDL极限比采用I/II型评分时更长。只有采用A/B型评分且允许严重减压病风险为0.2%时,三项式模型的轻度和严重概率才与当前的空气NDL合理相符。