Suppr超能文献

来自水螅的头部和足部抑制剂并非离子交换树脂假象。

The head and the foot inhibitor from hydra are not dowex artefacts.

作者信息

Chica Schaller H

机构信息

Department of Biophysics, Max-Planck-Institute for Medical Research, Jahnstrasse 29, 6900, Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany.

Department of Zoology, University of Heidelberg, Jahnstrasse 29, 6900, Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol. 1984 Mar;193(2):117-118. doi: 10.1007/BF00848640.

Abstract

In a recent publication in this journal (Berking 1983) it was claimed (1) that the head inhibitor we isolated from hydra is a Dowex artefact, (2) that a separate foot inhibitor does not exist in hydra and (3) that the only inhibitor that has so far been isolated from hydra is one which inhibits head and foot regeneration equally well. These statements are incorrect and require a response. In the following, I would like to summarise our evidence that the inhibitors isolated from hydra, including Berking's inhibitor, have different specificities for head and foot regeneration. In addition, I would like to show that none of our substances are Dowex artefacts.

摘要

在本期刊最近发表的一篇文章中(伯金,1983年),有人声称:(1)我们从水螅中分离出的头部抑制剂是一种离子交换树脂假象;(2)水螅中不存在单独的足部抑制剂;(3)迄今为止从水螅中分离出的唯一一种抑制剂对头部和足部再生的抑制效果相同。这些说法是不正确的,需要作出回应。在下文,我将总结我们的证据,即从水螅中分离出的抑制剂,包括伯金的抑制剂,对头部和足部再生具有不同的特异性。此外,我还将表明我们所得到的物质都不是离子交换树脂假象。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验