迈向一份用于评估抑郁核心症状的极简短自评量表（VQIDS-SR）。
Toward a very brief self-report to assess the core symptoms of depression (VQIDS-SR ).
作者信息
De La Garza N, John Rush A, Grannemann B D, Trivedi M H
机构信息
Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore.
出版信息
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Jun;135(6):548-553. doi: 10.1111/acps.12720. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To develop a short, 5-item measure of the core symptoms of depression based on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR ) and to evaluate psychometric properties of this new measure (Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report: VQIDS-SR ).
METHOD
Using data from a convenience sample of the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) trial, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the VQIDS-SR , its sensitivity to change, and its comparability to the QIDS-SR and clinician-rated scales (QIDS-C and VQIDS-C ).
RESULTS
The VQIDS-SR has a single-factor structure with an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.67-0.81). The VQIDS-SR was as sensitive to change as its parent scale, then QIDS-SR and, detected change at an earlier time frame. Additionally, the VQIDS-SR was comparable to the QIDS-SR , QIDS-C , and VQIDS-C .
CONCLUSION
The VQIDS-SR can effectively evaluate the core symptoms of depression during the course of treatment.
摘要
目的
基于16项抑郁症状快速自评量表（QIDS-SR）开发一个简短的、包含5个条目的抑郁核心症状测量工具，并评估这个新测量工具（极短抑郁症状自评量表：VQIDS-SR）的心理测量学特性。
方法
利用联合药物治疗改善抑郁结局（CO-MED）试验便利样本的数据，我们评估了VQIDS-SR的心理测量学特性、其对变化的敏感性以及它与QIDS-SR和临床医生评定量表（QIDS-C和VQIDS-C）的可比性。
结果
VQIDS-SR具有单因素结构，内部一致性可接受（克朗巴哈系数：0.67 - 0.81）。VQIDS-SR对变化的敏感性与其母量表QIDS-SR相同，且能在更早的时间框架内检测到变化。此外，VQIDS-SR与QIDS-SR、QIDS-C和VQIDS-C具有可比性。
结论
VQIDS-SR能够在治疗过程中有效评估抑郁的核心症状。
相似文献
1
Toward a very brief self-report to assess the core symptoms of depression (VQIDS-SR ).迈向一份用于评估抑郁核心症状的极简短自评量表（VQIDS-SR）。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Jun;135(6):548-553. doi: 10.1111/acps.12720. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
2
Psychometric and Clinical Evaluation of the Clinician (VQIDS-C) and Self-Report (VQIDS-SR) Versions of the Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms.抑郁症状快速问卷临床医生版（VQIDS-C）和自评版（VQIDS-SR）的心理测量与临床评估
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Feb 17;18:289-302. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S342457. eCollection 2022.
3
A Comparison of Depressive Symptom Self-Reported Measures in the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN).《德克萨斯州青少年抑郁与自杀研究网络（TX-YDSRN）中抑郁症状自我报告测量的比较》。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 18;85(1):23m14861. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23m14861.
4
The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation.公共部门心境障碍患者的抑郁症状量表临床医生评定版（IDS-C）与自评版（IDS-SR）以及快速抑郁症状量表临床医生评定版（QIDS-C）与自评版（QIDS-SR）：一项心理测量学评估
Psychol Med. 2004 Jan;34(1):73-82. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703001107.
5
Psychometric properties of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.16项抑郁症状快速量表的心理测量学特性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jan;60:132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report: a psychometric evaluation in patients with asthma and major depressive disorder.抑郁症状快速自评量表：哮喘合并重度抑郁症患者的心理测量学评估
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 May;100(5):433-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60467-X.
7
The Spanish version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR16): a psychometric analysis in a clinical sample.《抑郁症状快速自评量表-自我报告版（QIDS-SR16）西班牙版：临床样本的心理计量学分析》
J Affect Disord. 2014 Dec;169:189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
8
A Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) in Outpatients with Depression.德国版抑郁症状快速检查表（QIDS-SR16）在门诊抑郁症患者中的心理测量学评估。
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2015 Dec;83(12):e17-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-110203. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
9
Psychometric evaluation and linking of the PHQ-9, QIDS-C, and VQIDS-C in a real-world population with major depressive disorder.在患有重度抑郁症的真实人群中对患者健康问卷-9（PHQ-9）、快速抑郁症状问卷-自填版（QIDS-C）和视觉快速抑郁症状问卷-自填版（VQIDS-C）进行心理测量评估及关联分析。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Mar 26;20:671-687. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S444223. eCollection 2024.
10
Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) in UK primary care.英国初级保健中抑郁症状快速清单（QIDS-SR）的心理测量特性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 May;47(5):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
引用本文的文献
1
Developing Measurement-Based Care for Youth in an Outpatient Psychiatry Clinic: The Penn State Psychiatry Clinical Assessment and Rating Evaluation System for Youth (PCARES-Youth).在门诊精神病诊所为青少年建立基于测量的护理：宾夕法尼亚州立大学青少年精神病临床评估与评级评估系统（PCARES-Youth）。
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020;5(1):67-82. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2020.1727795. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Performance and Psychometric Properties of Novel Brief Assessments for Depression in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年抑郁症新型简短评估方法的性能及心理测量特性
JAACAP Open. 2024 May 27;3(2):335-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.05.002. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Psychometric evaluation and linking of the PHQ-9, QIDS-C, and VQIDS-C in a real-world population with major depressive disorder.在患有重度抑郁症的真实人群中对患者健康问卷-9（PHQ-9）、快速抑郁症状问卷-自填版（QIDS-C）和视觉快速抑郁症状问卷-自填版（VQIDS-C）进行心理测量评估及关联分析。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Mar 26;20:671-687. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S444223. eCollection 2024.
4
Measurement-Based Care for Depression in Youth: Practical Considerations for Selecting Measures to Assess Depression, Associated Features and Functioning.青少年抑郁症的基于测量的护理：选择评估抑郁症、相关特征和功能的测量方法的实际考量
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Jan 13. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01652-4.
5
Personalized relapse prediction in patients with major depressive disorder using digital biomarkers.利用数字生物标志物对重度抑郁症患者进行个体化复发预测。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 30;13(1):18596. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44592-8.
6
Psychometric and Clinical Evaluation of the Clinician (VQIDS-C) and Self-Report (VQIDS-SR) Versions of the Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms.抑郁症状快速问卷临床医生版（VQIDS-C）和自评版（VQIDS-SR）的心理测量与临床评估
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Feb 17;18:289-302. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S342457. eCollection 2022.
7
Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9).莫兹利改良患者健康问卷（MM-PHQ-9）的编制与验证
BJPsych Open. 2021 Jul 2;7(4):e123. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.953.
8
Stability of frontal alpha asymmetry in depressed patients during antidepressant treatment.抗抑郁治疗中抑郁患者额区α不对称性的稳定性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102056. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102056. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
本文引用的文献
1
The Validity of the Different Versions of the Hamilton Depression Scale in Separating Remission Rates of Placebo and Antidepressants in Clinical Trials of Major Depression.在重度抑郁症临床试验中，不同版本汉密尔顿抑郁量表在区分安慰剂和抗抑郁药缓解率方面的有效性。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Oct;36(5):453-6. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000557.
2
Isn't It About Time to Employ Measurement-Based Care in Practice?现在难道不是在实践中采用基于测量的护理的时候了吗？
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;172(10):934-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15070928. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
3
Brief, unidimensional melancholia rating scales are highly sensitive to the effect of citalopram and may have biological validity: implications for the research domain criteria (RDoC).简短的单维度抑郁评定量表对西酞普兰的效果高度敏感，可能具有生物学效度：对研究领域标准（RDoC）的启示。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jul;163:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.049. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
4
Comparing HAMD(17) and HAMD subscales on their ability to differentiate active treatment from placebo in randomized controlled trials.比较 HAMD(17) 和 HAMD 子量表在随机对照试验中区分活性治疗与安慰剂的能力。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Mar 5;145(3):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
Combining medications to enhance depression outcomes (CO-MED): acute and long-term outcomes of a single-blind randomized study.联合用药增强抑郁治疗效果（CO-MED）：一项单盲随机研究的急性期和长期结局。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;168(7):689-701. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111645. Epub 2011 May 2.
6
Factor structure and dimensionality of the two depression scales in STAR*D using level 1 datasets.使用一级数据集研究 STAR*D 中两种抑郁量表的因子结构和维度。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Aug;132(3):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
7
HAM-D17 and HAM-D6 sensitivity to change in relation to desvenlafaxine dose and baseline depression severity in major depressive disorder.在重度抑郁症中，与去甲文拉法辛剂量和基线抑郁严重程度相关的 HAM-D17 和 HAM-D6 变化的敏感性。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2010 Nov;43(7):271-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1263173. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
8
Self-rated global measure of the frequency, intensity, and burden of side effects.副作用频率、强度及负担的自我评定整体指标。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2006 Mar;12(2):71-9. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200603000-00002.
9
Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.在STAR*D研究中采用基于测量的护理评估西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效：对临床实践的启示
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.
10
Measuring the severity of depression and remission in primary care: validation of the HAMD-7 scale.测量初级保健中抑郁症的严重程度及缓解情况：汉密尔顿抑郁量表-7项版的效度验证
CMAJ. 2005 Nov 22;173(11):1327-34. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050786.
Zotero 插件