Boccardi Marina, Gallo Valentina, Yasui Yutaka, Vineis Paolo, Padovani Alessandro, Mosimann Urs, Giannakopoulos Panteleimon, Gold Gabriel, Dubois Bruno, Jack Clifford R, Winblad Bengt, Frisoni Giovanni B, Albanese Emiliano
Department of Psychiatry, LANVIE-Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology (LANE), IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio-Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Centre of Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary, University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Blizard Institute, London, UK.
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Apr;52:141-152. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.021.
Biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are not yet validated for use in clinical settings. We aim to provide a methodological framework for their systematic validation, by reference to that developed for oncology biomarkers. As for this discipline, the steps for the systematic validation of AD biomarkers need to target analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility. However, the premises are different from oncology: the nature of disease (neurodegeneration vs. cancer), the purpose (improve diagnosis in clinically affected vs. screening preclinical individuals), and the target population (mild cognitive impairment patients referring to memory clinics vs. general population) lead to important differences, influencing both the design of validation studies and the use of selected biomarkers. This framework is applied within a wider initiative to assess the current available evidence on the clinical validity of biomarkers for AD, for the final aim to identify gaps and research priorities, and to inform coordinated research efforts boosting AD biomarkers research.
用于阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断的生物标志物尚未在临床环境中得到验证。我们旨在通过参考肿瘤生物标志物的验证方法,为AD生物标志物的系统验证提供一个方法框架。对于这一学科而言,AD生物标志物系统验证的步骤需要针对分析有效性、临床有效性和临床实用性。然而,其前提与肿瘤学不同:疾病的性质(神经退行性变与癌症)、目的(改善临床患者的诊断与筛查临床前个体)以及目标人群(转诊至记忆门诊的轻度认知障碍患者与普通人群)导致了重要差异,这既影响验证研究的设计,也影响所选生物标志物的使用。该框架应用于一项更广泛的计划中,以评估目前关于AD生物标志物临床有效性的现有证据,最终目的是识别差距和研究重点,并为推动AD生物标志物研究的协调研究工作提供信息。