Suppr超能文献

复吸后更换戒烟药物的有效性。

Effectiveness of Switching Smoking-Cessation Medications Following Relapse.

作者信息

Heckman Bryan W, Cummings K Michael, Kasza Karin A, Borland Ron, Burris Jessica L, Fong Geoffrey T, McNeill Ann, Carpenter Matthew J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):e63-e70. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.038. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nicotine dependence is a chronic disorder often characterized by multiple failed quit attempts (QAs). Yet, little is known about the sequence of methods used across multiple QAs or how this may impact future ability to abstain from smoking. This prospective cohort study examines the effectiveness of switching smoking-cessation medications (SCMs) across multiple QAs.

METHODS

Adult smokers (aged ≥18 years) participating in International Tobacco Control surveys in the United Kingdom, U.S., Canada, and Australia (N=795) who: (1) completed two consecutive surveys between 2006 and 2011; (2) initiated a QA at least 1 month before each survey; and (3) provided data for the primary predictor (SCM use during most recent QA), outcome (1-month point prevalence abstinence), and relevant covariates. Analyses were conducted in 2016.

RESULTS

Five SCM user classifications were identified: (1) non-users (43.5%); (2) early users (SCM used for initial, but not subsequent QA; 11.4%); (3) later users (SCM used for subsequent, but not initial QA; 18.4%); (4) repeaters (same SCM used for both QAs; 10.7%); and (5) switchers (different SCM used for each QA; 14.2%). Abstinence rates were lower for non-users (15.9%, OR=0.48, p=0.002), early users (16.6%, OR=0.27, p=0.03), and repeaters (12.4%, OR=0.36, p=0.004) relative to switchers (28.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest smokers will be more successful if they use a SCM in QAs and vary the SCM they use across time. That smokers can increase their odds of quitting by switching SCMs is an important message that could be communicated to smokers.

摘要

引言

尼古丁依赖是一种慢性疾病,其特征通常是多次戒烟尝试失败。然而,对于多次戒烟尝试中所使用方法的顺序,或者这可能如何影响未来戒烟的能力,我们知之甚少。这项前瞻性队列研究考察了在多次戒烟尝试中更换戒烟药物(SCM)的有效性。

方法

在英国、美国、加拿大和澳大利亚参与国际烟草控制调查的成年吸烟者(年龄≥18岁)(N = 795),他们:(1)在2006年至2011年期间完成了两次连续调查;(2)在每次调查前至少1个月开始进行戒烟尝试;(3)提供了主要预测指标(最近一次戒烟尝试期间使用的SCM)、结果(1个月的时点患病率戒烟情况)和相关协变量的数据。分析于2016年进行。

结果

确定了五种SCM使用者分类:(1)未使用者(43.5%);(2)早期使用者(SCM用于初次戒烟尝试,但未用于后续尝试;11.4%);(3)后期使用者(SCM用于后续戒烟尝试,但未用于初次尝试;18.4%);(4)重复使用者(两次戒烟尝试都使用相同的SCM;10.7%);(5)更换使用者(每次戒烟尝试使用不同的SCM;14.2%)。与更换使用者(28.5%)相比,未使用者(15.9%,OR = 0.48,p = 0.002)、早期使用者(16.6%,OR = 0.27,p = 0.03)和重复使用者(12.4%,OR = 0.36,p = 0.004)的戒烟率较低。

结论

研究结果表明,如果吸烟者在戒烟尝试中使用SCM并随时间改变所使用的SCM,他们会更成功。吸烟者可以通过更换SCM来增加戒烟几率,这是一个可以传达给吸烟者的重要信息。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Switching Smoking-Cessation Medications Following Relapse.复吸后更换戒烟药物的有效性。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):e63-e70. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.038. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Natural history of attempts to stop smoking.戒烟尝试的自然史。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Sep;16(9):1190-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu052. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
9
An updated algorithm for choosing among smoking cessation treatments.一种用于选择戒烟治疗方法的更新算法。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Aug;45(2):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验