• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adjacent level disease-background and update based on disc replacement data.相邻节段疾病——基于椎间盘置换数据的背景与更新
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9396-5.
2
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.Prestige LP椎间盘人工颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段病变:一项24个月的前瞻性、多中心随机对照临床试验结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):653-667. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.采用PRESTIGE LP椎间盘的颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:一项前瞻性、多中心研究性器械豁免研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Nov;23(5):558-573. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE14589. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术非连续杂交手术中中间节段的生物力学效应:有限元分析。
Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1254-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
6
Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/os.12585. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
7
The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相比相邻节段的变化:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1549-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
8
A Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients with Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-Up Results.双节段颈椎间盘退变疾病患者颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较:5年随访结果
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e1083-e1089. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.231. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗两节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
Is the behavior of disc replacement adjacent to fusion affected by the location of the fused level in hybrid surgery?杂交手术中融合节段的位置是否会影响临近节段置换的行为?
Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2171-2180. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of a 2D kinematic HASTE sequence in magnetic resonance imaging assessment of adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.二维运动快速自旋回波序列在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变磁共振成像评估中的应用价值。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1113-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10133-0. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 10 Years: Results From a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial at 3 Sites.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术10年疗效对比:一项三中心前瞻性随机临床试验结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):230-240. doi: 10.14444/8431. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Mid- to long-term rates of symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery after cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials.颈椎间盘置换术后与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术相比,中至长期症状性临近节段疾病需要手术治疗的发生率:前瞻性随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 12;15(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01957-3.
4
Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 2: Clinical Results at 7-Year Follow-Up.颈椎间盘置换术或颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的相邻节段病变,第2部分:7年随访的临床结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Jun 30;14(3):278-285. doi: 10.14444/7037. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study.单节段前路颈椎椎间融合术采用锚定零轮廓椎间融合器与椎间融合器-钢板结构后的相邻节段生物力学:一项有限元研究。
BMC Surg. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00729-4.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of cervical disc replacement with a novel prosthesis based on the physiological curvature of endplate.基于终板生理曲度的新型假体颈椎间盘置换的生物力学评估
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Feb 27;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0748-7.

本文引用的文献

1
3-Tesla Kinematic MRI of the Cervical Spine for Evaluation of Adjacent Level Disease After Monosegmental Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Arthroplasty: Results of 2-Year Follow-Up.用于评估单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除及关节成形术后相邻节段疾病的3特斯拉颈椎运动MRI:2年随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):224-231. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001705.
2
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Seven-Year Outcomes.使用 Prestige LP 椎间盘的颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:七年随访结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Jun 22;10:24. doi: 10.14444/3024. eCollection 2016.
3
Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.颈椎手术后相邻节段疾病的患病率:一项遵循PRISMA的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(27):e4171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004171.
4
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Incidence of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗症状性相邻节段疾病发生率的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验的Meta分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Oct 1;41(19):1493-1502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001537.
5
ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病:美国食品药品监督管理局前瞻性随机研究器械豁免研究的七年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 4;97(21):1738-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01186.
6
Adjacent segment degeneration and disease following cervical arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颈椎置换术后相邻节段退变与疾病:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2016 Feb;16(2):168-81. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.032. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.美国食品药品监督管理局器械临床试验豁免(IDE)前瞻性随机对照临床试验比较PCM颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的长期结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):674-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000869.
8
Adjacent segment pathology requiring reoperation after anterior cervical arthrodesis: the influence of smoking, sex, and number of operated levels.颈椎前路融合术后需要再次手术的相邻节段病变:吸烟、性别及手术节段数量的影响
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):E571-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000846.
9
Risk-factor analysis of adjacent-segment pathology requiring surgery following anterior, posterior, fusion, and nonfusion cervical spine operations: survivorship analysis of 1358 patients.颈椎前路、后路、融合和非融合手术后需要手术治疗的相邻节段病变的风险因素分析:1358 例患者的生存分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 5;96(21):1761-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01482.
10
Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.人工颈椎间盘的临床和影像学分析:Prestige 前瞻性随机对照临床试验 7 年随访:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

相邻节段疾病——基于椎间盘置换数据的背景与更新

Adjacent level disease-background and update based on disc replacement data.

作者信息

Kaye I David, David Kaye I, Hilibrand Alan S

机构信息

Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

出版信息

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9396-5.

DOI:10.1007/s12178-017-9396-5
PMID:28337729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5435627/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The precise etiology of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery is controversial. Theories for development include inevitable changes secondary to the natural progression of the degenerative cascade and changes secondary to altered biomechanics of the fused cervical spine. Motion preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasties (CDA), have been introduced with the hopes of reducing the rates of adjacent segment pathology. Recently, 7-year data from the investigational device exemption (IDE) studies have been published. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on cervical adjacent segment disease incorporating this emerging data into the analysis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the 7-year data for CDA has confirmed continued success, specifically regarding improved neck pain and reduced re-operation rates, the influence of CDA on reducing rates of adjacent segment pathology remains questionable. Although some studies have found more radiographic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) compared to CDA, an association between these findings and clinical symptoms has not been established. Cervical disc arthroplasty continues to outperform cervical disc fusion regarding some patient specific parameters, however, whether CDA reduces rates of radiographic and clinical adjacent segment pathology remains unknown. Without studies developed specifically to address this question, the answer remains elusive.

摘要

综述目的

颈椎手术后相邻节段疾病的确切病因存在争议。其发病理论包括退变级联反应自然进展继发的不可避免变化以及颈椎融合后生物力学改变继发的变化。诸如颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)等保留运动功能的技术已被引入,以期降低相邻节段病变的发生率。最近,来自研究性器械豁免(IDE)研究的7年数据已公布。本综述的目的是结合这些新出现的数据,对颈椎相邻节段疾病进行分析并提供最新情况。

最新发现

尽管CDA的7年数据证实了其持续的成功,特别是在改善颈部疼痛和降低再次手术率方面,但CDA对降低相邻节段病变发生率的影响仍存在疑问。尽管一些研究发现,与CDA相比,前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后影像学上的相邻节段疾病更多,但这些发现与临床症状之间的关联尚未确立。在一些患者特定参数方面,颈椎间盘置换术继续优于颈椎间盘融合术,然而,CDA是否能降低影像学和临床相邻节段病变的发生率仍不清楚。由于没有专门针对这个问题开展的研究,答案仍然难以捉摸。