Schreiber Richard, Sittig Dean F, Ash Joan, Wright Adam
Holy Spirit-A Geisinger Affiliate, Camp Hill, PA, USA.
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston's School of Biomedical Informatics and the UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality & Safety, Houston, TX, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):958-963. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw188.
In this report, we describe 2 instances in which expert use of an electronic health record (EHR) system interfaced to an external clinical laboratory information system led to unintended consequences wherein 2 patients failed to have laboratory tests drawn in a timely manner. In both events, user actions combined with the lack of an acknowledgment message describing the order cancellation from the external clinical system were the root causes. In 1 case, rapid, near-simultaneous order entry was the culprit; in the second, astute order management by a clinician, unaware of the lack of proper 2-way interface messaging from the external clinical system, led to the confusion. Although testing had shown that the laboratory system would cancel duplicate laboratory orders, it was thought that duplicate alerting in the new order entry system would prevent such events.
在本报告中,我们描述了两起案例,其中电子健康记录(EHR)系统与外部临床实验室信息系统对接后,专家的使用导致了意外后果,即两名患者未能及时进行实验室检查。在这两起事件中,用户操作加上缺乏来自外部临床系统的订单取消确认信息是根本原因。在一个案例中,快速、近乎同时的订单录入是罪魁祸首;在第二个案例中,一名临床医生精明的订单管理,但未意识到外部临床系统缺乏适当的双向接口消息传递,导致了混乱。尽管测试表明实验室系统会取消重复的实验室订单,但人们认为新订单录入系统中的重复警报会防止此类事件发生。