Dubois Romain, Paillard Thierry, Lyons Mark, McGrath David, Maurelli Olivier, Prioux Jacques
Laboratory of Physical Activity, Performance and Health (EA 4445), University of Pau and Pays de l'Adour, Tarbes, France; CA Brive Correze Limousin Rugby Club.
Laboratory of Physical Activity, Performance and Health (EA 4445), University of Pau and Pays de l'Adour , Tarbes, France.
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):84-92. eCollection 2017 Mar.
The aims of this study were (1) to analyze elite rugby union game demands using 3 different approaches: traditional, metabolic and heart rate-based methods (2) to explore the relationship between these methods and (3) to explore positional differences between the backs and forwards players. Time motion analysis and game demands of fourteen professional players (24.1 ± 3.4 y), over 5 European challenge cup games, were analyzed. Thresholds of 14.4 km·h, 20 W.kg and 85% of maximal heart rate (HR) were set for high-intensity efforts across the three methods. The mean % of HR was 80.6 ± 4.3 % while 42.2 ± 16.5% of game time was spent above 85% of HR with no significant differences between the forwards and the backs. Our findings also show that the backs cover greater distances at high-speed than forwards (% difference: +35.2 ± 6.6%; p<0.01) while the forwards cover more distance than the backs (+26.8 ± 5.7%; p<0.05) in moderate-speed zone (10-14.4 km·h). However, no significant difference in high-metabolic power distance was found between the backs and forwards. Indeed, the high-metabolic power distances were greater than high-speed running distances of 24.8 ± 17.1% for the backs, and 53.4 ± 16.0% for the forwards with a significant difference (+29.6 ± 6.0% for the forwards; p<0.001) between the two groups. Nevertheless, nearly perfect correlations were found between the total distance assessed using the traditional approach and the metabolic power approach (r = 0.98). Furthermore, there is a strong association (r = 0.93) between the high-speed running distance (assessed using the traditional approach) and the high-metabolic power distance. The HR monitoring methods demonstrate clearly the high physiological demands of professional rugby games. The traditional and the metabolic-power approaches shows a close correlation concerning their relative values, nevertheless the difference in absolute values especially for the high-intensity thresholds demonstrates that the metabolic power approach may represent an interesting alternative to the traditional approaches used in evaluating the high-intensity running efforts required in rugby union games.
(1)使用三种不同方法分析精英橄榄球联盟比赛的要求,即传统方法、基于代谢和心率的方法;(2)探究这些方法之间的关系;(3)探究后卫和前锋球员之间的位置差异。分析了14名职业球员(24.1±3.4岁)在5场欧洲挑战杯比赛中的时间动作分析和比赛要求。针对这三种方法,将高强度运动的阈值设定为14.4千米/小时、20瓦/千克和最大心率(HR)的85%。平均心率百分比为80.6±4.3%,比赛时间的42.2±16.5%是在心率高于85%的情况下度过的,前锋和后卫之间无显著差异。我们的研究结果还表明,后卫在高速时覆盖的距离比前锋更远(百分比差异:+35.2±6.6%;p<0.01),而在中速区域(10 - 14.4千米/小时),前锋覆盖的距离比后卫更远(+26.8±5.7%;p<0.05)。然而,后卫和前锋在高代谢功率距离上没有显著差异。实际上,后卫的高代谢功率距离比高速奔跑距离长24.8±17.1%,前锋的高代谢功率距离比高速奔跑距离长53.4±16.0%,两组之间存在显著差异(前锋为+29.6±6.0%;p<0.001)。尽管如此,使用传统方法评估的总距离与代谢功率方法之间发现了近乎完美的相关性(r = 0.98)。此外(使用传统方法评估的)高速奔跑距离与高代谢功率距离之间存在很强的关联(r = 0.93)。心率监测方法清楚地表明了职业橄榄球比赛对生理的高要求。传统方法和代谢功率方法在相对值方面显示出密切的相关性,然而绝对值的差异,特别是对于高强度阈值,表明代谢功率方法可能是评估橄榄球联盟比赛所需高强度奔跑努力的传统方法的一个有趣替代方案。