Prasongvej Pichita, Nanthakomon Tongta, Jaisin Kankamol, Chanthasenanont Athita, Lertvutivivat Supapen, Tanprasertkul Chamnan, Bhamarapravatana Kornkarn, Suwannarurk Komsun
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Thailand. Email:
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Feb 1;18(2):385-389. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.2.385.
Background : To determine a baseline quality of life (QoL) in cervical cancer survivors compared to that of healthy subjects in the tertiary Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand. Materials and Methods: The investigation was conducted at the outpatient gynecological department of Thammasat University Hospital between January and June 2016. A total of 192 women were entered into the study (97 cervical cancer survivors; 37 after radical hysterectomy (RH), 43 with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT), and 17 featuring both RH and CRT; and 95 control subjects from the same outpatient department with no history of malignancy). Participant QoL was assessed using a Thai version of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life) and a general survey for the assessment of sociodemographic data was also conducted. Results: There were significant differences in physical, role, emotional and social functions between cervical cancer survivor and control groups. Global health, fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and financial difficulties also demonstrated statistically significant variation. Cervical cancer survivors treated by RH had higher scores for emotional and social function and global health than the control group. Moreover, they had less appetite loss, fatigue and financial difficulties. However, patients treated with CRT experienced more pain than the control group. All cervical cancer survivors had lower physical function scores than the control group. Conclusion: Quality of life in cervical cancer survivors is better than in healthy peers in some domains. Cervical cancer survivors treated with RH may have a better QoL than healthy peers. Early detection for early stage cervical cancer remains most important because treatment in early stages does not cause lowering of the QoL.
为了确定泰国法政大学医院三级医疗中心的宫颈癌幸存者与健康受试者相比的基线生活质量(QoL)。材料与方法:2016年1月至6月在法政大学医院门诊妇科进行调查。共有192名女性纳入研究(97名宫颈癌幸存者;37名接受根治性子宫切除术(RH),43名接受同步放化疗(CRT),17名同时接受RH和CRT;以及95名来自同一门诊且无恶性肿瘤病史的对照受试者)。使用泰语版的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC-QLQ-C30)评估参与者的生活质量,并进行了一项关于社会人口统计学数据评估的一般调查。结果:宫颈癌幸存者组与对照组在身体、角色、情感和社会功能方面存在显著差异。总体健康、疲劳、疼痛、食欲减退和经济困难也显示出统计学上的显著差异。接受RH治疗的宫颈癌幸存者在情感和社会功能以及总体健康方面的得分高于对照组。此外,他们的食欲减退、疲劳和经济困难较少。然而,接受CRT治疗的患者比对照组经历更多疼痛。所有宫颈癌幸存者的身体功能得分均低于对照组。结论:宫颈癌幸存者在某些领域的生活质量优于健康同龄人。接受RH治疗的宫颈癌幸存者的生活质量可能优于健康同龄人。早期发现早期宫颈癌仍然最为重要,因为早期治疗不会导致生活质量下降。