Suppr超能文献

使用放射性标记糖溶液对笼养蜜蜂的食物消耗和食物交换情况进行研究。

Food consumption and food exchange of caged honey bees using a radioactive labelled sugar solution.

作者信息

Brodschneider Robert, Libor Anika, Kupelwieser Vera, Crailsheim Karl

机构信息

Institute of Zoology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29;12(3):e0174684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174684. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

We measured the distribution of sugar solution within groups of caged honey bees (Apis mellifera) under standard in vitro laboratory conditions using 14C polyethylene glycol as a radioactive marker to analyze ingestion by individual bees after group feeding. We studied the impact of different experimental setups by varying the number of bees, age of bees, origin of bees, duration of experiment, the amount of available diet, and the influence of the neurotoxic pesticide imidacloprid in the diet on the feeding and food sharing behavior (trophallaxis). Sugar solution was non-uniformly distributed in bees in 36 out of 135 cages. As a measure of the extent to which the sugar diet was equally distributed between caged bees, we calculated the (inner 80%) intake ratio by dividing the intake of the 90th percentile bee by the intake of the 10th percentile bee. This intake ratio ranged from 1.3 to 94.8 in 133 individual cages, further supporting a non-uniform distribution of food among caged bees. We can expect a cage with 10 or 30 bees containing one bee that ingests, on average, the 8.8-fold of the bee in the same cage ingesting the smallest quantity of food. Inner 80% intake ratios were lower in experiments with a permanent or chronic offering of labelled sugar solution compared to temporary or acute feedings. After pooling the data of replicates to achieve a higher statistical power we compared different experimental setups. We found that uniform food distribution is best approached with 10 newly emerged bees per cage, which originate from a brood comb from a single colony. We also investigated the trophallaxis between caged honey bees which originally consumed the diet and newly added bees. Color marked bees were starved and added to the cages in a ratio of 10:5 or 20:20 after the initial set of bees consumed all the labelled sugar solution. The distribution of the labelled sugar solution by trophallaxis within 48 hours to added bees was 25% (10:5) or 45% (20:20) of the initial sugar solution. Imidacloprid at its median lethal dose (LD50) in the sugar solution reduced this post-feeding food transmission to 27% (20:20). Our results show that differences in food intake exist within caged bees that may lead to differential exposure that can influence the interpretation of toxicity tests.

摘要

在标准体外实验室条件下,我们使用¹⁴C聚乙二醇作为放射性标记物,测量了笼养蜜蜂(意大利蜜蜂)群体内糖溶液的分布情况,以分析群体喂食后个体蜜蜂的摄入量。我们通过改变蜜蜂数量、蜜蜂年龄、蜜蜂来源、实验持续时间、可用食物量以及食物中神经毒性杀虫剂吡虫啉的影响,研究了不同实验设置对蜜蜂进食和食物共享行为(交哺行为)的影响。在135个笼子中的36个笼子里,糖溶液在蜜蜂中的分布不均匀。作为衡量糖饮食在笼养蜜蜂之间平均分配程度的指标,我们通过将第90百分位数蜜蜂的摄入量除以第10百分位数蜜蜂的摄入量来计算(内部80%)摄入比。在133个单独的笼子中,这个摄入比在1.3到94.8之间,进一步支持了笼养蜜蜂之间食物分布不均匀的情况。我们可以预期,一个装有10只或30只蜜蜂的笼子里,平均有一只蜜蜂摄入的食物量是同一笼子里摄入食物量最少的蜜蜂的8.8倍。与临时或急性喂食相比,在持续或长期提供标记糖溶液的实验中,内部80%摄入比更低。为了获得更高的统计效力,我们将重复实验的数据汇总后,比较了不同的实验设置。我们发现,每个笼子放10只新羽化的蜜蜂,且这些蜜蜂来自单个蜂群的育虫脾时,食物分布最均匀。我们还研究了最初食用食物的笼养蜜蜂与新加入蜜蜂之间的交哺行为。在最初的一组蜜蜂消耗完所有标记糖溶液后,将饥饿的、带有颜色标记的蜜蜂以10:5或20:20的比例加入笼子。通过交哺行为,在48小时内传递给新加入蜜蜂的标记糖溶液量为初始糖溶液量的25%(10:5)或45%(20:20)。糖溶液中处于半数致死剂量(LD50)的吡虫啉将这种喂食后食物传递量降低到了27%(20:20)。我们的结果表明,笼养蜜蜂之间存在食物摄入量差异,这可能导致不同的暴露水平,进而影响毒性试验的解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验