• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

8至12岁儿童抓握动作的在线控制可预测标准化运动评估测试的表现。

Online Control of Prehension Predicts Performance on a Standardized Motor Assessment Test in 8- to 12-Year-Old Children.

作者信息

Blanchard Caroline C V, McGlashan Hannah L, French Blandine, Sperring Rachel J, Petrocochino Bianca, Holmes Nicholas P

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park Nottingham, UK.

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading Reading, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 16;8:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00374. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00374
PMID:28360874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5352659/
Abstract

Goal-directed hand movements are guided by sensory information and may be adjusted 'online,' during the movement. If the target of a movement unexpectedly changes position, trajectory corrections can be initiated in as little as 100 ms in adults. This rapid visual online control is impaired in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD), and potentially in other neurodevelopmental conditions. We investigated the visual control of hand movements in children in a 'center-out' double-step reaching and grasping task, and examined how parameters of this visuomotor control co-vary with performance on standardized motor tests often used with typically and atypically developing children. Two groups of children aged 8-12 years were asked to reach and grasp an illuminated central ball on a vertically oriented board. On a proportion of trials, and at movement onset, the illumination switched unpredictably to one of four other balls in a center-out configuration (left, right, up, or down). When the target moved, all but one of the children were able to correct their movements before reaching the initial target, at least on some trials, but the latencies to initiate these corrections were longer than those typically reported in the adult literature, ranging from 211 to 581 ms. These later corrections may be due to less developed motor skills in children, or to the increased cognitive and biomechanical complexity of switching movements in four directions. In the first group ( = 187), reaching and grasping parameters significantly predicted standardized movement scores on the MABC-2, most strongly for the aiming and catching component. In the second group ( = 85), these same parameters did not significantly predict scores on the DCDQ'07 parent questionnaire. Our reaching and grasping task provides a sensitive and continuous measure of movement skill that predicts scores on standardized movement tasks used to screen for DCD.

摘要

目标导向的手部动作由感觉信息引导,并且在动作过程中可能会“在线”调整。如果动作目标意外改变位置,成年人在短短100毫秒内就能启动轨迹校正。这种快速的视觉在线控制在患有发育性协调障碍(DCD)的儿童以及其他潜在的神经发育状况中会受损。我们在“中心向外”双步伸手抓握任务中研究了儿童手部动作的视觉控制,并研究了这种视觉运动控制参数如何与通常用于典型和非典型发育儿童的标准化运动测试成绩共同变化。两组8至12岁的儿童被要求伸手抓握垂直板上的一个发光中心球。在一定比例的试验中,在动作开始时,照明会不可预测地切换到中心向外配置的其他四个球之一(左、右、上或下)。当目标移动时,除一名儿童外,其他所有儿童至少在某些试验中能够在到达初始目标之前纠正他们的动作,但启动这些校正的延迟比成人文献中通常报道的要长,范围从211到581毫秒。这些较晚的校正可能是由于儿童运动技能发育不完善,或者是由于向四个方向切换动作时认知和生物力学复杂性增加。在第一组(= 187)中,伸手抓握参数显著预测了MABC - 2上的标准化运动成绩,对瞄准和接球部分的预测最为强烈。在第二组(= 85)中,这些相同的参数并没有显著预测DCDQ'07家长问卷上的得分。我们的伸手抓握任务提供了一种对运动技能敏感且连续的测量方法,可预测用于筛查DCD的标准化运动任务的成绩。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/9274559e3507/fpsyg-08-00374-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/43f57da2af2b/fpsyg-08-00374-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/cdb0c7ea25d1/fpsyg-08-00374-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/2dcbcaa0d887/fpsyg-08-00374-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/0d98c54e213b/fpsyg-08-00374-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/9274559e3507/fpsyg-08-00374-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/43f57da2af2b/fpsyg-08-00374-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/cdb0c7ea25d1/fpsyg-08-00374-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/2dcbcaa0d887/fpsyg-08-00374-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/0d98c54e213b/fpsyg-08-00374-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a46f/5352659/9274559e3507/fpsyg-08-00374-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Online Control of Prehension Predicts Performance on a Standardized Motor Assessment Test in 8- to 12-Year-Old Children.8至12岁儿童抓握动作的在线控制可预测标准化运动评估测试的表现。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 16;8:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00374. eCollection 2017.
2
Dissecting online control in Developmental Coordination Disorder: a kinematic analysis of double-step reaching.剖析发展性协调障碍中的在线控制:双步趋近的运动学分析。
Brain Cogn. 2011 Apr;75(3):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
3
Rapid online correction of reach-to-manipulate movements in children with developmental coordination disorder: A pilot kinematic comparison study.发展性协调障碍儿童伸手抓物运动的快速在线矫正:一项运动学比较研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2024 Jan;111:106154. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106154. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
Bimanual Reach to Grasp Movements in Youth With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.有和没有自闭症谱系障碍的青少年的双手抓握动作
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 17;9:2720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02720. eCollection 2018.
5
Cross-cultural validation of the Arabic version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire DCDQ'07, in a Lebanese sample of children.跨文化验证阿拉伯语版发展协调障碍问卷 DCDQ'07 在黎巴嫩儿童样本中的应用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Aug;115:103999. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103999. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
Development of eye-hand coordination in typically developing children and adolescents assessed using a reach-to-grasp sequencing task.使用伸手抓握序列任务评估正常发育儿童和青少年的手眼协调发展。
Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Dec;80:102868. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102868. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
Kinematic Assessment of Fine Motor Skills in Children: Comparison of a Kinematic Approach and a Standardized Test.儿童精细运动技能的运动学评估:运动学方法与标准化测试的比较
Vision (Basel). 2024 Feb 17;8(1):6. doi: 10.3390/vision8010006.
8
Relationship between the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire 2007 and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition in Korean Children.2007年发育协调障碍问卷与韩国儿童运动技能熟练程度布鲁茵克斯-奥塞瑞斯基第二版测试之间的关系
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;9(2):255. doi: 10.3390/children9020255.
9
The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.近期视觉反馈对抓握孔径编程的影响具有抓握特异性,双手共享,且由感觉运动记忆而非任务集介导。
Cognition. 2015 May;138:49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
10
Anticipatory postural adjustment deficits in children with developmental coordination disorder during a self-induced prehension task while standing on one leg.在单腿站立的自我诱发抓取任务中,发育性协调障碍儿童存在预期姿势调整缺陷。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 1;14(1):26299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77951-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceiling effects in the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) suggest that non-parametric scoring methods are required.运动评估测试儿童-2 版(MABC-2)中的天花板效应表明,需要使用非参数评分方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198426. eCollection 2018.
2
Development of reaching during mid-childhood from a Developmental Systems perspective.从中年期发展系统的角度看伸手动作的发展。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0193463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193463. eCollection 2018.
3
Improvement in children's fine motor skills following a computerized typing intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Categorical and Dimensional Definitions and Evaluations of Symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN Rating Scales.注意缺陷多动障碍症状的分类与维度定义及评估:SNAP和SWAN评定量表的历史
Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2012 Apr;10(1):51-70.
2
Online control of reaching and pointing to visual, auditory, and multimodal targets: Effects of target modality and method of determining correction latency.对视觉、听觉和多模态目标进行伸手和指向动作的在线控制:目标模态及确定校正延迟方法的影响
Vision Res. 2015 Dec;117:105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
3
The relationship between manual coordination and mental health.
计算机打字干预后儿童精细运动技能的改善。
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Dec;56(Pt B):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
4
Optimal motor synergy extraction for novel actions and virtual environments.针对新动作和虚拟环境的最佳运动协同提取
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Aug 1;118(2):652-654. doi: 10.1152/jn.00165.2017. Epub 2017 May 24.
手动协调与心理健康之间的关系。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;25(3):283-95. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0732-2. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
4
Coupling online control and inhibitory systems in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: Goal-directed reaching.发育性协调障碍儿童中在线控制与抑制系统的耦合:目标导向性够物动作
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Jan;36C:244-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
5
The relationship between a child's postural stability and manual dexterity.儿童姿势稳定性与手部灵巧性之间的关系。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Sep;232(9):2907-17. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3947-4. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets.手臂在向视觉目标移动过程中的轨迹修正。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Summer;3(3):220-30. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.220.
7
Grasping the changes seen in older adults when reaching for objects of varied texture.把握老年人在抓取不同质地物体时的变化。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e69040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069040. Print 2013.
8
The development of rapid online control in children aged 6-12 years: reaching performance.6-12 岁儿童快速在线控制的发展:达到表现水平。
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Oct;32(5):1138-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
9
Analysis of methods to determine the latency of online movement adjustments.在线运动调整潜伏期测定方法分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):131-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0349-7.
10
Impaired online control in children with developmental coordination disorder reflects developmental immaturity.发育性协调障碍儿童的在线控制受损反映出发育不成熟。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2013;38(2):81-97. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2012.718820.